Harrys Place, David Toube and the Zionists Cabal

Image - British Intelligence Corps NCOs, Sergeant Clifford Martin and Sergeant Mervyn Paic murdered by the Jewish Irgun terrorist group then their bodies booby trapped with grenades so as to kill any British soldiers who tried to cut them down and bury them. Not even the Islamists have been as barbaric as the Irgun Zionist scum were. The bodies of dead British soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan have not ever suffered such foul indignities at the hands of the Islamists as these two poor brave soldiers experienced at the hands of the Zionists.

Israel has never extradited any Zionist terrorists in the Irgun or Stern Gang terrorist groups to face trial for killing British soldiers, nor has Israel ever tried or convicted any of the killers of British soldiers.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sergeants_affair






Image - David Toube. The smuggest Zionist arsehole in Britain.





Interesting little article mentioning yours truly on the Harrys Place site ;

http://hurryupharry.org/2010/08/07/the-bnp-israel-and-zionists/#comment-500340


Unfortunately seeing as David T who runs the site ( one of Britains most prominent Jews dontcha know what, what ) has banned me from commenting and deleted the comments I made on the site heres my response to the Zionist knuckle dragging moron ;


1) The article by Reconquista on the Green Arrow where he states proudly ' I am a Zionist' is one of the most pathetic, disgraceful and sickening articles I have ever read from a 'British Nationalist'.

The BNP supports the right of Israel to exist as a nation as we are nationalists.

Zionism is not nationalism.

Zionism is an imperialist, militaristic and racist ideology that seeks to usurp the national political processes of nations around the world so that they serve the interests of Zionism - from the Conservative Friends of Israel and the Labour Party in the UK to AIPAC in the US.

For any British Nationalist to call themselves a Zionist is sickening.

Such fools forget the King David Bombing and the terrorism of Irgun and the Stern Gang that murdered hundreds of British soldiers in Palestine.

For a British Nationalist to say they support Zionism ( which used terrorism to kill British troops in Palestine ) because they oppose Zionism ( which uses terrorism to kill British troops in Iraq and Afghanistan) is moronic.

Such people have no place in the BNP or British Nationalism.



2) Oh and can anyone on the Harrys Place site explain how Zionism = Jews when the most ardent Zionists on the planet are gentile, non-Jewish Christian Fundamentalists like George Bush and Tony Blair ?

Nah, thought not.

The old chestnut that Zionism = Jews is simply propaganda for those stupid enough to believe it.

The most ardent anti-Zionists on the planet are those like Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstein, Gerald Kaufman and Gilad Atzmon.

They are all Jews.

No doubt the old slur that they are 'self hating Jews' will be used to denigrate them - even though this slur is based on the premise that all jews must have a Jewish racial consciousness that puts the interests of Jews as a community before all other considerations if they are to be truly Jewish - which is exactly the same racism that the Nazis stood for.




3) Zionists are not nationalists.

Nationalists say ' what we do in our country is our business, and what you do in your own country is your business' but Zionists say ' What Israel does is our business and what Iran does is also our business'.

Zionists say Israel has a right to have nuclear weapons, but that Iran doesnt and that the US and Israel must bomb Iran in order to prevent it getting nuclear weapons.

Thats not Nationalism.

That is sickening cant and hypocrisy.



4) How are the EDL 'racists' for opposing Islamism, when Islam is a religion and not a race ?

Doesnt make sense does it, as thats just another media lie for the idiots to believe.




5) It appears that David T ( one of Britains... you get the point ) doesnt want the world to know that Jews are vastly over represented on the US supreme court, and that WASP's ( the largest demographic in America) are not even represented on the supreme court.

Now I wonder why the Jewish Zionist David T and the Jewish Zionist Edmund Standing would not want the world to know that Jews and Zionists are over represented on the US supreme Court ?

Is it because David T and Edmund Standing believe like the Nazis that all 'true' Jews should have a Jewish racial consciousness that requires them to promote the interests of the Jewish community and Israel before all other communities ?

I wonder.

Sunny Hundal - How The Media Help The BNP

Image - Sunny Hundal of The Guardian and Pickled Politics. He could only have got his job through affirmative action plans as he is a talentless hack.

His head also resembles a hairy testicle.






I will analyse a few points from the article below - but if you read the comments section of the online article you will read that Sunny says in response to someones statement that 'It isn't "far right" to want to preserve the existence of one's people'

Sunny replies with the comment ;

' Why isn't it? You're saying to me that trying to maintain racial differences isn't racist? '

Thats all you need to know about Sunny.

If you do not breed with a member of another race, and thereby accelerate the destruction of your own unique racial identity, then you are racist.

What a total twat Sunny is.

This sick, poisonous and warped 'definition of racism' comes straight from Sunny's deranged little mind.

Perhaps we should all be held down and raped / sperm drained so as to accelerate the process eh Sunny.

I dare you Sunny to go to any country in the world, from Pakistan to Russia, and say that to the people of that country and call them all racists for not misceginating their own people out of existence - they will call you more than a total twat, they will probably beat you to death as well you lunatic.

Note that even Andrew Gilligan took the piss out of the group that sunny is launching for peddling lies about Nick Griffin's appearance on Question Time that Sunny said lead to the death of two gay men from homophobic attacks.

The first gay man who was killed died a MONTH BEFORE Nick Griffin appeared on Question Time.

The other gay man did not die.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100026946/is-there-a-moral-difference-between-nazis-and-communists/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/andrew-gilligan/7220004/The-BNP-will-dig-its-own-grave-far-better-than-Peter-Hain.html

If Sunny is unable to even get the most basic facts such as those right - then he and his group are a total joke.

Yes Sunny, you are an embarassment to journalism.

When Sunny and his collection of sad media whores like Yasmin Brown and the terrorism supporter Peter Hain peddle such obvious bollocks, only a total mug would take anything that Sunny said seriously.

Sunny is a racist.


Not only does he deny the very existence of the indigenous British people ( which is defined as a 'Holocaust By Default' as if we do not exist then we can be exterminated at will and it is not a crime against humanity ) he is also a racist in that anyone who is indigenous British must be called a Nazi and denied the right to campaign in British politics.

My comments to sunnys article below are preceded by ######## and in brackets.




http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/23/media-bnp-push-agenda

There was a brilliant column by Johann Hari a few years ago about his experience of appearing on a Sky News programme hosted by newspaper columnist Richard Littlejohn. Having admitted he didn't know how much an asylum seeker got in benefits, Littlejohn screeched at Hari: "It's people like you who help the BNP!"

Now, you could be forgiven for thinking that the election of two MEPs would bring the BNP under closer scrutiny since last year. Surely the media glare would expose its nasty underbelly? The party's deputy leader, Simon Darby, doesn't seem to think so:

"Dealing with the press on a daily basis it is hard not to develop a healthy disrespect for the people who quite rightly can be blamed for the state this country is in today. However, certainly over the last year I am not the only one here at BNP Towers that has noticed a distinct thaw in the attitude towards us from some aspects of the media."

The problem here is that while newspaper columnists and reporters keep stating they hate the BNP and all it stands for, they nevertheless keep promoting narratives that harden BNP support. Here is a short list I prepared earlier.

Blaming racism on immigrants

A common media theory is more immigration leads to a breakdown of social cohesion and hence more racism. If we want to stop racism then we must stop immigration, apparently. This assumes that people naturally hate those of other races or cultures – which isn't true. We don't have moral panics about Americans, Europeans or Chinese people coming here because there's no threat assumed from them. People don't naturally hate the other but are afraid if they think the immigrants represent a threat to their way of life.

There are different kinds of threats, of course, which may not even be to do with difference. Sometimes completely different cultures are tolerated as long as people "do their own thing". My point is that examples countering this myth are numerous. Social cohesion doesn't need to automatically break down but it sometimes does need to be managed if flashpoints take place (which could happen even in a racially homogenous country – for instance mods and rockers). However, I prefer a stronger sense of Britishness.

###### ( social cohesion of Britain broke down because Teddy boys and mods had a FEW punch ups in Margate in the 50's and 1960's. Oh right. Unreal. What a knob)

Blaming racism on minorities

You know the answer to this one – are Jews to blame for antisemitism? I think not.

######## ( Many people think that the actions and behaviour of many individual Jews over history, from Marx to Madoff, bear a lot of responsibility for provoking anti-semitism including many Jews from Gilad Atzmon to Norman Finkelstein to Noam Chomsky and Yoav Shamir. This is just Sunnys way of trying to blame British society for anti-semitism as well as blaming British society for Islamaphobia, rather than Islamists and Muslims being responsible for generating Islamaphobia or the actions of some individual Jews for generating Anti-semitism in society.

So Sunny has to defend the actions of Jewish criminals, extremists, crooks etc whose individual actions assist in the promotion of negative stereotypes about Jews because if he didnt then he would have to concede that Islamists and Muslims themselves are largely responsible for negative perceptions of Islamists and Muslims amongst non-Muslims. Especially those dead, maimed or limbless non-Muslims who have been blown up by Muslims and Islamist terrorists)


This trick is usually directed towards long-settled ethnic minorities and used to hold them responsible for problems as a whole. But rather than blame them directly, these days the vague punch-bag of "multiculturalism" is used instead. There is the strong insinuation for example that all black Londoners are to blame for knife crime (which has fallen hugely incidentally)

####### ( Another lie from Sunny, as we all know that the Black Christian church going people from the Commonwealth who live in London are not a problem in relation to knife crime. They spend their time in church praising Jesus not stabbing people. The idea there is just one set of 'black Londoners' is racist rubbish. West Indians hate Africans, Somalis etc. Sunny you are an idiot. )

, or "their culture" is to blame. That inevitably leads some to call them "savages". And because minorities are then labelled as backward or uncivilised, it becomes easy to blame them for hating them. After all, the mythical "race relations industry" is also commonly blamed for all the evils of the world, as is the funding of cultural festivals (I've dealt with this one in more detail here).


##########( would be that the same race relations industry that you exploited sunny in order to get your job on The Guardian, as you sure didnt get there for your talents as a writer or as a proponent of truth and facts did you sunny )

Overplaying BNP gains, underplaying Greens

Come election time, every media outlet is anxious to see how much the BNP vote will expand by. But despite the Nick Griffin on Question Time drama and two new MEPs, the BNP's electoral support remains woefully small at around 2%. In contrast, more successful parties such as the Greens are ignored by the media, because they're not seen as "dangerous". This always overplays the BNP presence in people's minds and gives the impression it has become a widely successful party.

######### ( Oh yeah, the Greens are ignored. What planet is he from )

Playing down impact of BNP victories

Racial and religiously motivated crime usually rises following election of BNP councillors, research has shown. And yet this fact is rarely highlighted.


######## ( The best one yet. If you follow the link on the article it reveals that the 'research' was done by The Guardian and Hope Not Hate. So we can all trust their research cant we. Then lets look at the figures. In 8 out of 29 wards hate crimes rose after a BNP councillor was elected - but the research doesnt reveal WHAT RACE the people were who were victims of that race crime. It is a fact that the election of a BNP councillor means whites then report race crimes when before they didnt. So the figures are related to whites reporting more crimes against them and also race crimes that are ethnic minority on ethnic minority. But the figures also reveal that in 11 wards RACE CRIMES DROP AFTER THE ELECTION OF A BNP COUNCILLOR. Which kinda fucks up totally sunnys bullshit thesis doesnt it. The article also quotes a police officer saying of the rise in race crimes in Solihull that " Detective Chief Inspector Sharon Goosen said: "None of the offences reported in the area since 2006 can be directly attributed to an elected member or political organisation."
So sunny was talking total shit. AGAIN ! )



But people who vote BNP aren't racist are they?

If you want to vote BNP and think people of different cultures and races are scary, why not just say so? Every modern interview with a BNP voter is prefaced with: "I vote BNP, not because I'm racist but ... ", which inevitably leads to a diatribe on why immigrants are leading the country into hell in a handcart. It has been repeatedly pointed out, even in most tabloids and broadsheets, that the BNP is a racist party. It is tearing itself over the issue right now. Surely it should be obvious to most what it stands for by now?


####### ( the BNP 'tearing itself' - ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha )

Debate on immigration is being suppressed

Probably the oldest trick in the book. The rightwing press talks about immigration every day. And yet commentators on the right maintain with a straight face that the debate on immigration is being suppressed. What they actually mean is: those immigrants who don't agree with us are all bad.

Let's be clear: Britain is now a multiracial and multicultural country. This means more mixing, which in turn means that racism can never become as socially acceptable as it was in the 70s and 80s. But people's attitudes are way ahead of many journalists – who are still happy to push their bigoted agenda. That is what keeps the BNP's agenda alive, and it needs to be exposed.


######### ( So journalists should not criticise Jews and Muslims, the government should force people to marry people from other races, the teddy boys nearly destroyed British social cohesion in the 1950's and the BNP have a time machine that enables them to travel back in time and kill gays - sunny you are the world smallest cockend. You even look like a cock you mug. )



• Sunny Hundal is speaking at the launch of Expose the BNP: media workers and students opposed to racism and fascism on Tuesday 23 February at 7pm at the Amnesty International Human Rights Action Centre, 17-25 New Inn Yard, London EC2A 3EA. Other speakers include: Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Mehdi Hasan, Peter Hain and Michelle Stanistreet

The Afghanistan War, Nothing British About the BNP and the Murdoch Media

I am getting sick and tired of the scumbags in Nothing British About the BNP, James Bethel and Tim Montgomery, the idiots that run Harrys Place and the Murdoch media empire exploiting the families of dead British soldiers.

They accuse the BNP of exploiting dead British soldiers when we use their images in our videos and leaflets, but it is not we who can be accused of exploiting the dead, it is them.

The only real exploitation going on here is Nothing British About the BNP, a tory front group, using the families of dead British soldiers to attack the BNP and Harrys Place doing the same.

Both the Tories and Harrys Place supported the illegal war in Iraq that killed our troops.

The BNP would never have sent British troops to die in the illegal war in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

Nor would the BNP have cut the defence budget to send them under equipped to fight in those wars which has led to many of their deaths.

Nothing British, by getting a load of Tory supporting generals to attack the BNP, have disgraced the army and politicised the army.

The BNP have never pulled a load of retired generals chasing seats in the House of Lords to peddle Tory nonsense via the tory yellow press. These same generals were complicit in the illegal war.

They are also war criminals as much as the politicians that started the war.

Nothing British, run by Bethel and Montgomery and funded by the Conservative Friends of Israel supporters, have NEVER served in the British army.

Who the hell do these chinless tory toffs think they are using the British army to support their insane Zionist agenda.

As for the image used in the BNP video.

That image was an image used widely in the media and taken at a public event.

The murdoch papers used that image in their papers to sell their papers and profit from the paper sales, and they did not donate any money to any of the families of dead British soldiers when using those images.

Nor have they ever given any money to any charities for British soldiers even though they have printed thousands upon thousands of similar images in their papers.

The newspapers have exploited the dead by directly profiting from the images they print in their papers and at the same time print propaganda to continue the wars.

That is both immoral and disgusting.

The Murdoch Papers are also directly complicit in the illegal wars as they peddled the bogus WMD propaganda that led to the war.

Murdoch is a war criminal, the sun the Das Sturmer of today.

To be frank, the image of Liam Elms is not owned by the family and therefore they cannot say how it may be used, both in fact and law.

The BNP used the image in order to ensure this idiotic war for pipelines ends and no more British troops die.

The BNP want this war to end so no more British soldiers die.

Nothing British About the BNP and Harrys Place on the other hand want the war to continue and more British troops to die.

The fact is that what happened to Liam Elms was a tragedy, but what matters most of all is that no more British troops die.

Anyone can understand the parents and family of dead British troops trying to find some meaning to their sacrifice, but the fact is that what truly matters is that no more soldiers die.

What matters ONLY to the BNP is that no more British soldiers die and that must always take precedence over the natural desire of a grieving family to seek some meaning to the death of their loved ones by continuing the war they fought in.

At some point all wars end - and this war must end right now.

The moral politician and the moral politics would be to end the war now, not to perpetuate it because the blood of British soldiers has been shed already.

That is merely to perpetuate the crime of the politicians, perpetuate the deaths of British soldiers, perpetuate the suffering of families and perpetuate the war.

The only moral meaning in their deaths must be that the war must end, as there is no morality in using their deaths to perpetuate suffering, war and death.

It is natural for grieving families to seek a meaning to the sacrifice of their loved ones, but for those who understand the true nature of the conflict and the lies which have been used by corrupt politicians to start the war and continue the war, what is more important is that no more soldiers die in their illegal wars.

In order to fight this ongoing insane war then the public have to be reminded of the fact that British soldiers are dying and being maimed in it.

That means those who want to hide the fact that our troops are dying and being maimed by hiding the images of the dead and wounded in order to allow this war to continue are complicit in the deaths of our troops, and by attacking the BNP who want the war to stop, are acting as war propagandists and peddling pro-war propaganda.

Note that the Tory Party policy to continue the Afghanistan War is the same position as Nothing British About the BNP and Harrys Place and the Murdoch Media that support the Tories - and who also support a war on Iran.

Nothing British About the BNP, Harrys Place and the Murdoch Media Empire all support the continuation of the Afghanistan War, the ongoing death of British troops in that war and also a war on Iran.

YOU ARE WAR MONGERING CRIMINALS USING THE FAMILIES OF DEAD BRITISH SOLDIERS TO CONTINUE YOUR ILLEGAL WARS.

You should be ashamed of yourselves.

The BNP policy is the only moral policy - as under the BNP no more illegal wars will be fought, no more British troops will die, no more Murdoch Press papers like The Sun will be allowed to peddle their propaganda and no more grieving families will have to cling to the hope that their family members have not died in vain.

That makes the BNP the ONLY moral politivcal party in the UK.

Nothing British About the BNP are vile, evil, cynical little toerags using the families of dead British soldiers to continue their illegal wars and to support the Tories.

Edmund Standing, Harrys Place and Hypocrisy

A very interesting news story here on Arutz Sheva, a national news site of Israel, about an article on President Obama's website comparing Israel to the Nazis ;

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/171995#


But what is also interesting are the banners on the right of the article on the website, so lets take a look.


The first is ;

http://www.shuva.net/page1.htm

This site has links to Neo-Nazi sites on it and also has a flashing banner telling American Jews, who one would guess would be AMERICAN CITIZENS to come 'home'.

Presumably 'home' is Israel which is a strange thing to say as if 'Nazis' said that Jews belonged in Israel then they would be called racist.

One wonders if Palestinian refugees and Palestinian Christians in America who are also AMERICAN CITIZENS would be offered a chance to go 'home' to Israel or whether this racist 'home' policy applies only to Jews, who have no link with Israel at all other than that they are Jews.

Explain that one Edmund Standing !


The second is even better ;

http://jonahweb.org/index.php

This is a site for Homosexual Jews which seeks to cure them of their homosexuality.

How PC and so respectful of diversity and difference, or is homosexuality and homophobia something only the West should worry about ?

Edmund, are you there ?


Then comes the Third ;

http://www.friendsofefrat.org/?clientid=835

This is the 'Bring a Bay to Israel' site. Not a black one though, but a very 'Aryan' looking baby in fact. This is an anti-Abortion site, and there was I wondering why so many Jewish liberals and Jewish owned media outlets in the West attack Christians as 'fundamentalists' when they fight against abortion !

EDMUND, EDMUND - ARE YOU THERE ?


Then finally ;

http://narth.com/?clientid=646

Another anti-homosexuality site with loads of anti-homosexuality articles and propaganda.

Yet guess what - the ADL and the rest of the Jewish activism groups that list all the 'hate sites' dont list these sites as 'hate sites'.

I wonder why.


Edmund - come on now, stop sulking.

Harrys Place - Are They Waking up ?

An interesting comment on Harrys Place here ;



http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/right-wing-nutjobs-and-anti-muslim-bigots/#comment-392615


I’ll share an anecdote with you: since I returned to the UK over the Summer after a decade-long absence flitting backwards and forwards from the Mid East, I’ve moved away from London to a provincial town. I’ve been supplementing my main occupation here as a translator and interpreter, often with Kurdish Iraqis. Recently, there have been 4 serious sexual offences committed in broad daylight not far from the town centre. In each case, a group of Kurdish men was found to be involved and the victim, a native Briton. These attacks have led some people in the town to accuse ALL Kurds and by specious analogy, ALL Muslims of being the problem. There has been a suggestion that a demonstration, no doubt involving some ideogical racists and other anti-Muslim bigots alongside the genuinely concerned, would be held. Now, these attacks were not committed by Islam and nor were they committed by adherents to scripture or doctrine. Only twisted psychopaths would use justifications for rape and pillage in Muhammad’s biography to rape Britons. Nor is rape or serious sexual assault a facet of Kurdish culture. Therefore, in this case, and in others, it would be unethical and immoral to essentialise all Kurds and all Muslims.


That’s not to say that the attacks weren’t motivated by racism, because they most likely were; a Kurdish woman would not have been subjected to these attacks.

Neither should this prevent us from using our God-given faculties to induce that groups of young Kurdish men are more likely to rape or sexually assault non-Muslim women than Muslim women.

Experience tells us that Kurds in the UK are disproportionately involved in sexual crime and that the victim will almost certainly be a young, ‘white’ female.

Should I use this reasoning to extrapolate trends and ‘behaviour matrices’ for all Muslims or all immigrants and asylum seekers? Would the same be true if I replaced ‘Kurd’ with ‘Muslim’? No. Of course it wouldn’t. That would be a monstrous, and worst of all, inaccurate position.

When anyone claims that every member of a certain group possesses certain distinct characteristics that can be used to colour our perceptions about the entire group, you can almost certainly say that such a claim is based on shaky foundations and risks aping the committed ideological racism of others.

I understand where you’re coming from: you, like me, reject the myopia of much of the left in the face of dogged empiricism: yes, Nigerians in London are disproportionately involved in fraud, for example. Whole swathes of the left would object to you making such an assertion, even though it’s based in fact. Yet these self-same so-called anti-racists swallowed whole and memorised verbatim the Macpherson Report, possibly the most destructive document in British history and watershed for tickbox racists, colour-matchers and piss-poor-linguist, ill-informed pigeonhole racists everywhere. This despite the claims of ‘institutional racism’ being conconcted from the Marxoid witterings and slatherings of the far left, and not one wiff of statistical analysis.

The Strategy of Little Green Footballs and Harrys Place

After 9/11, the Neo-Conservatives and their Zionist allies saw an opportunity and developed a deceptive strategy of “Entryism” concealing their traditional anti-white Zionist supremacist bigotry with a facade of anti-jihadism.

Both Harrys Place, a site where the Jewish Zionist Edmund Standing writes, usually carries pieces on the BNP that are then copied onto the Little Green Footballs site: Revealing that both Harrys Place and Little Green Footballs real concern is empowering Zionism, not Islam.

Both HP AND LGF are Zionist controlled operations - whilst Little Green Footballs is a site for the swivel eyed, foaming at the mouth pro-Zionists and anti-Islam nutters, HP is a centre left site where the Zionism comes disguised with a moderate package.

The product is the same, just with a slightly different flavour to ensure the masses all get the flavour they like.

The 911 trick was to turn anti-Islamism into both anti-Islam sentiment and pro-Israel sentiment.

It worked.

The retarded Republican Right of the US public fell for it hook line and sinker - whilst waving the US flag they led their country into slavery to Zionism, Israel and AIPAC.

Dumb Americans were too stupid to see that what America required was a foreign policy that put the interests of American citizens first - not the interests of AIPAC, Israel, the oil companies, the military-industrial block and the globalists.

Instead in a knee jerk political spasm of historical stupidity, they waved the flag all the time their constitution, their civil rights and their liberty was removed.

In the name of 'fighting terrorism' that 'threatened the freedom of all Americans' they allowed their own government to remove their constitutional rights that guaranteed their liberty for hundreds of years.

Little Green Footballs and Harrys Place spend more time attacking the BNP than they do offering any constructive critique of Islam or Islamism.

This is because that is their primary role.

Both HP and LGF are designed to draw the hatred caused by 911 into support for Zionism and Israel, and therefore any groups that resist the domination of the Zionist cabals that control our media, much of our politics and much of our countries must also be targeted by LGF.

Therefore the two main enemies of LGF are ;

1) Islam

2) The BNP.

The BNP are in fact the primary threat to both HP and LGF.

This is because the BNP is not run by the US security services as much of the so called 'Islamist' terror groups like Al Qaeda are.

The Al Qaeda groups of the world wherever they appear are usually set up, funded, and controlled by either the CIA, the Saudi security services, the ISI of Pakistan or MI6.

From paying Al Qaeda in Libya to kill Gadaffi ( as MI6 did ) and the CIA running Osama Bin Laden as a CIA asset until the day of 911 ;

Link here ;

http://lukery.blogspot.com/2009/07/bombshell-bin-laden-worked-for-us-till.html

" Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman (audio, partial transcript).

In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained 'intimate relations' with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, "all the way until that day of September 11."

These 'intimate relations' included using Bin Laden for 'operations' in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These 'operations' involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner "as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict," that is, fighting 'enemies' via proxies.

As Sibel has previously described, and as she reiterates in this latest interview, this process involved using Turkey (with assistance from 'actors from Pakistan, and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia') as a proxy, which in turn used Bin Laden and the Taliban and others as a proxy terrorist army.

Control of Central Asia

The goals of the American 'statesmen' directing these activities included control of Central Asia's vast energy supplies and new markets for military products. "



HP and LGF are for the 'non-thinkers' of the anti-Islam movement.

The people that post on the site LGF are the sort of people that think ' My country right or wrong' means 'My president right or wrong'.

They think that anyone who waves a flag is a patriot - even if that flag is made in China and the person waving is a paid whore of the oil companies, the military-industrial block, Zionists and the mass media.

They think that anyone who speaks or preaches about 'Jeyzus' is a good guy - even if they are whoring, lieing, theiving hypocritical, mass murdering, corrupt son of a bitch.

The problem with most Americans is that they see politics only through the lens of America, and therefore any demagogue who wraps their rhetoric in the flag or who speaks about 'Jeyzus' will win them over.

LGF and HP are designed to cater to that market.

LGF appeals to the plastic patriots of America - the idiots who dont understand the difference between patriotism and nationalism.

HP appeals to the liberal leftist who likes their anti-Islam with a leftist tinge.

LGF appeals to 'patriots'.

A patriot is whore to whoever is in power - they serve only the government, not the people.

A nationalist serves only the interests of the people.

They see the 'government' as primarily a mechanism for the profit of sectarian interests within society.

Nationalists want the maximum freedom for the individual and the smallest State possible, as a nationalist knows that a large state and a large government are the enemies of democracy and the people.

Usually a nationalist regards the government, unless it is a nationalist government, as the enemy of the people.

Nationalists fought and died to build America.

Patriots surrendered America to the Neo-Conservative junta of Bush and to the Neo-Trotskyites of Obama.

Patriotism is simply slavery to the latest fool to wave the flag.

Nationalists see their only master as the Constitution and the will of the people.

Patriots will take up arms to invade foreign nations because politicians want to make profits from war just because that war is wrapped in the flag.

Nationalists act only to ensure the interests of the nation are protected by increasing national security within the nation.

Nationalists do not invade other nations - patriots will invade other nations as they serve the interests of the government and therefore they serve the interests of those that control the government.

The reason why the US was hit on 911 was because US troops were in Saudi Arabia and Al Qaeda were able to get into the US via the immigration system.

Note that the HP and LGF are against any political parties that demand ;

1) The withdrawal of and repatriation all troops from foreign bases


2) The ending of all lax immigration policies that allow immigration into our nations.


Dumb patriots are too stupid to understand that the fundamental cause of terrorism is when we are over there and they are over here.

Only when we withdraw from their lands (and thereby remove the causes of terrorism) will they not be able to attack us here ( when we remove them from our countries).

Instead the Neo-Con war on terrorism was based on ;

1) Increasing the presence of US troops and British troops over there (Iraq and Afghanisan, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia ) and waging a 'crusade' against Islam

2) Allowing more Muslims to enter our countries via refusing to tighten the immigration rules

911 was the opportunity for the US military Industrial Complex, the British Military Industrial Complex, the UK and US Zionists, the Oil Companies and the Globalists to turn the fear and trauma caused by 911 into unquestioning obedience to their plans.

Wrap the flag around the New Oil Imperialism and the sheeple would bleat and applaud even as theur liberty and constitution were being stolen away from them beneath their very noses.

The traitors like Bush and the 911 Cabalists were only able to complete their plans with the help of websites like LGF and HP.

They are accomplices to the crimes of their masters.

Therefore as the dogs they are, they attack who they are told to attack by their masters.

I support America 100 % - but I despise the US Military Industrial Block, the Zionists of AIPAC, the oil companies and the corrupt media and security services that control the US

I support the right of Israel to exist 100 % - but I despise the Zionists that control it and whose tentacles slither in the halls of power in Britain and the US.

I support the right of the Palestinian people to national self determination 100 % - but I despise Islamism.

Only when the inner enemies are purged from all our nations will our nations and our people be free.

There are probably less than 100,000 of these inner criminals in both our nations - they are the head of the dragon, and that must be severed if both of our nations are to survive and our peoples be free.

Harry Place Has Another Pop

Heres what I have posted on Harrys Place to respond to their article on me here ;


http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/05/13/bnps-lee-barnes-zionists-run-the-world/


Hi lads,

I think the idea that Zionists have undue influence in our nations (and by Zionists lads please note that this is not a code for ‘ze jews’ as Zionism is also a wacky Christian Fundamentalist cult and also supported by atheists, communists and capitalists of all races and colours) is not one opposed by many sane people.

Zionism is not a Jewish ideology, it is primarily a cult for insane non-Jewish Christian Funda’mentalists’ that are in the grip of their Jesus Is Coming eschatology.

Only the real anti-semites call anti-Zionism ‘anti-semitism’, primarily as the Palestinians are real semites whilst most Zionists are not semites. Most Christian Zionists support the extermination of the Palestinian people so JC can come back and kill or convert all the Jews.

Heres Tam Dalyell ;

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3228.htm

Heres Jenny Tonge ;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5366870.stm

Heres the London Review of Books ;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5366870.stm

Heres a video ;

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2894821400057137878

Zionism, as a form of militant Israeli nationalism, is legitimate only in Israel.

When its tentacles are able to control our nations foreign policy and US foreign policy, as it did when it lobbyed for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to get the oil and bolster Israel, then it is in fact organised treason.

For fucks sake lads at least try and get it right when you have a pop at me, its a bit boring have to keep correcting you all the time.

Peace Out.

Lee

Harrys Place = CENSORSHIP AGAIN

Image - Harrys Place on a day out. Thats me at the back before they banned me for excercising free speech on a website dedicated to defending free speech. Idiots.




I was just getting into a good old debate on Harrys Place here ;

http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/05/03/is-the-bnp-christian/

When the people that run the site decided to start censoring my posts.

So it appears that Harrys Place motto of ' Liberty if it means anything is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear' in fact means ' If we arent winning the argument we are going to censor you'.

What a bunch of weak assed pussies.


When idiots cannot win the debate, they impose censorship.

Censorship = The democracy of fools.