The Killer Blow For The Red Tory Phillip Blond

I have discovered the killer flaw in the theory of the Red Tory Phillip Blond and Camerons plans to create a new 'Charity State' - which is that there are tens of thousands of charities for non-whites but just ONE charity for the indigenous whites and English.

In effect the plans of Cameron to pour tax money into charities is Directly Racist against whites and will result in the mass impoverishment and social alienation of indigenous whites and the white English.

A charity can only provide services to those groups it has been set up to assist, but in the case of charities for the indigenous British white community and the English - there is just one charity.

This means that Cameron must loosen the legislation that regulates how charities exist in order to allow thousands of new ethno-specific charities to be set up to assist white people, the white British and the white English or else our people will be left impoverished and abandoned.

This means that the idea of Red Tory are total rubbish - phillip blond says that multi-culturalism has fractured society, yet he wants to retain all the ethno-specific charities of the existing multi-cultural system but will not allow new charities to provide services for whites, the white British and white English.

Therefore either all the existing ethno-specific charities are all banned or the law allows tens of thousands of new charities to be set up to assist the white people who have no charitiable bodies to assist them.

Therefore if they do not ban all the existing ethno-specific charities, then the process of multi-cultural social fragmentation must be increased in order to create more ethno-specific white only charities.

Therefore his entire plan makes no sense - and we all know that Cameron will never allow white only charities to be set up to assist white people for fear of being called racist.

This means Cameron is preparing to totally abandon the whites, the White British and the White English.

The Charity Commission has approximately 159,600 registered charities, although it should be noted that this figure is fairly volatile due to the registration of excepted charities and removal of inactive charities.

Around 15,500 charities have ticked the code ‘for people of a particular ethnic or racial origin’, however many are excluded from the research since they only operate abroad. There are about 6,860 charities identified that operate within the nations of England and Wales.

The top ten most charity represented ethnic / racial origin groups (based on the number of charities) is as followed...

Jewish about 1200
African 673
Bangladeshi / Bengali 417
Asian 331
Somali 215
India 209
Caribbean 198
Chinese 164
Black 144*
Pakistani 92

*the EHRC have been informed of this category term (i.e. Black) due to the concern that it may violate the Race Relations Act 1976, which is believed to prohibit the use of skin-colour as a means of distinguishing beneficiaries.

Naturally many of these categories overlap, for example ‘African’ and ‘Somalia’, but never-the-less the list does provide a crude understanding towards the representation groups receive.

The purpose of charities is to work for the benefit and interests of their target group. As the full table shows, the English are not even listed (meaning that there are under ‘10’ throughout England and Wales), which indicates that they are not ethnically well represented on a specific basis. This is both surprising and unfortunate since it implies that the largest ethnic group is disenfranchised and potentially neglected.


Listed below are a small selection of the ethnic charities in the UK.

Adzido Pan African Dance Ensemble
Africa Advocacy Foundation
Africa Educational Trust
African & African Caribbean Peoples Advisory Group
African & Caribbean Elders
African & Caribbean Evangelical Alliance
African Caribbean Association
African Caribbean Development Forum,
African Caribbean Family Mediation
African Caribbean Initiative
African Caribbean Leadership Council
African Caribbean Women's Development Centre
African Community Development Trust
African Community Welfare Association (ACWA)
African Cultural Association
African Education and Training Institute (AETL)
African Families Support Services
African Forum
African HIV Policy Network
African Refugees Project
African Schools Association
African United Action Front
African Welfare & Immigration Advisory Centre
African Welfare and Resource Centre
African Welfare Organisation
African Youth Organisation
African Youths Initiative- Ikemba
Africans and Desecendants Counselling Services
Africare
Afro Caribean Centre Ltd
Anglo-Chinese Arts Council
Anglo-Indian Circle
Angolan Civic Communities Alliance
Angolan Women's Alliance
Angolan Youth Alliance
Arhag H.A Refugee / Migrant Forum
Arhag Housing Association Ltd and Migrant Development Forum
Ashanti Associates
Asian Deaf Women's Association
Asian Time; Caribbean Times; African Times
Asian Youth & Social Club
Asian Youth Forum
Asians in Tower Hamlets
Association of Black Planners
Banga Bandhu Society London
Bangladesh British Chamber of Commerce
Bangladeshi Regeneration Network Trust
Barako International
Barnet Asians Old People Association
Bengali Community Education Centre
Bengali Cultural Association
Bengali Workers Association
Bexley Afro-Caribbean Community Association
BIRS/African Caribbean Business Database
Black & Minority Association in Disability
Black & Minority Ethnic Residents Group
Black & Asian Women's Network
Black Advisors - London Underground Black Workers Group
Black African Labour Committee
Black and Ethnic Minority Business Federation
Black and Minority Ethnic Health Forum
Black and Proud at SOAS
Black British Heritage Group
Black Business Association
Black Christians Civic Forum
Black Comedy Club Ltd.
Black Cultural Archives
Black Environment Network
Black Perspectives in Volunteering Group (BPVG Ltd)
Black Section London fire and Emergency Authority
Black Society of Lawyers - Student Members
Black Training and Enterprise Group
Black Women & Europe Network
Black Women Mean Business
Black Women's Health Project
Black Women's Mental Health Project
Black Women's Mental Health Projects
Black Workers Group- Horizon Housing Group
Black Youth & Community Workers Association
Brent Indian Association (BIA)
British Ethnic Broadcasting Association
British Muslim Association of Merton
Bromley Refugee Network ( BRN)
Camden Black Sisters
Camden Chinese Community Centre
Camden Health & Race Group
Camden Racial Equality Council
Centre for Armenian Information & Advice
Centre for Filipinos
Chinese Community Centre
Chinese Cultural Centre
Chinese Information and Advice Centre
Croydon Black youth workers grou
East London Black Women's Organisation
Eritrean Education & Publication Trust
Esan Community Association
Ese-oghene Associates
Ethiopian Advice and Information Bureau,
Ethiopian Advice and Support Centre
Ethnic Alcohol Counselling in Hounslow
Ethnic Community Service
Ethnic Media Group
Ethnic Minorities & Travellers Achievement Project (Brent Education Authority)
Ethnic Minority Advocacy Group
Ethnic Minority Enterprise Project Ltd & Brick Lane Business Association
Fifty Plus Elderly Asian Group
National Black Alliance-London
National Black Police Association
National Black Students Alliance
National Black Students Association
National Black Women's Network
National Coalition of Black Volunteering
National Convention of Black Teachers
Somali Advice Bureau
Somali Bravanese Welfare Association in Barnet
Somali Community Organisation in Barnet
Somali Education and Training Agency
Somali Project
Somali Project for Education & Training (SOMPET)
Somali Welfare Centre
Somali Women Association
South Asian Association
South Asian Literature & Arts Archive (SALIDAA)
South London Black Women in Business
South London Congolese Association
Southwark Action for Voluntary Organisations
Southwark Black and Minority Ethnic Tenants Organisation
Southwark Black Mentor Scheme
Southwark Black Women's Centre

Immigration is Colonisation

Rise in immigrants coming to UK, ONS data shows

Shoppers in London

About 590,000 people arrived in the UK last year

Immigration to the UK continued to rise last year, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

About 590,000 people came to live in Britain in 2008, compared with 574,000 the year before, figures showed.

However, a growing number of people have been leaving the UK permanently. About 427,000 people emigrated last year, up from 341,000 in 2007.

BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said most of this rise was because of non-UK citizens returning home.

Overall, net migration - the difference between those coming in and going out of the country - fell in 2008 by 70,000 to 163,000.

Work and study

Levels of immigration to the UK in 2008 are just marginally below the 2006 record of 596,000 immigrants.

Most of the immigrants were single and were Britons returning home, Polish, Indian or Chinese. About half were aged between 25 and 44.

For those leaving the country, Australia, Poland, Germany, Spain and France had been the most popular countries to head to in 2008, the ONS said.

That year saw the highest number of people emigrate since 1991, the first year with comparable records.

The ONS said there had been a large increase in the number of people emigrating for work-related reasons, particularly those with a fixed job to go to.

In 2008, some 136,000 people emigrated from the UK to start a definite job, compared to 100,000 a year earlier.

Border and Immigration Minister Phil Woolas said the falling net migration showed migrants came to the UK for short periods of time to work, contribute to the economy and then return home.

He said the government's points-based system launched a year ago was allowing for greater control over those coming to work or study from outside Europe.

Zionist Iraq Inquiry

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/22218/ex-ambassador-criticises-jews-iraq-inquiry


Ex- ambassador criticises Jews on Iraq inquiry

By Jessica Elgot, November 23, 2009
Sir Martin Gilbert.

Sir Martin Gilbert

The former British ambassador to Libya, Sir Oliver Miles, has criticised the appointment of two leading Jews to the Iraq inquiry.

Sir Oliver drew attention to the appointment of Holocaust historian and Winston Churchill biographer Sir Martin Gilbert, and the war historian and ‘Blair doctrine’ architect Sir Lawrence Freedman, who advocated humanitarian intervention in Kosovo and Afghanistan.

The two men will be made privy counsellors in order to sit on the inquiry committee.

Sir Oliver wrote in the Independent newspaper that he was concerned that two out of five of the Iraq War inquiry committee members were Jewish, and questioned the balance of the committee.

He wrote: “Both Gilbert and Freedman are Jewish, and Gilbert at least has a record of active support for Zionism.

“Such facts are not usually mentioned in the mainstream British and American media, but the Jewish Chronicle and the Israeli media have no such inhibitions, and the Arabic media both in London and in the region are usually not far behind.”

He added: “It is a pity that, if and when the inquiry is accused of a whitewash, such handy ammunition will be available. Membership should not only be balanced; it should be seen to be balanced.”

The Red Tory = another globalist idiot

Images - The return to the workhouses under the Tories.







The theories of the Red Tory Phillip Blond are total bollocks.

He rejects Thatcherism and the neo-liberal Free Market, yet wants to put money and power into churches, community groups and the voluntary sector and thereby create a new 'Charityocracy' to run alongside the Quangocracy and leave in place the Servile State, the millions of fake politically correct jobs in the state, leave political correctness to carry on as an infection in what is left of the British state and allow these charities, community groups and other associations to remain Politically Correct, unelected, unaccountable groups exercising real power in our communities and over peoples lives.

Charities in the UK are a sick joke.

There are so many bent charities run by bent trustees who profiteer from those charities, that the mechanism of charitable giving has to be one of the most inefficient forms of social action in history.

Whilst some of the bigger charities like the IRNLI are superb charities, many of them are simply organisations run like fiefdoms for the profits of the trustees and their bloated retinue of staff.

To have tax payers money pumped into these bloated charities would be the equivalent of the private finance initiative of the Labour Party in relation to the NHS, in that it would be money used to expand the wages and staff of the charity at the expense of people who need help from the charity. This is just what happened with the PFI initiative which merely created a vast expansion in middle management of the NHS and raised their wages at the expense of improving services, cutting staff wages, increasing waiting times, less services and cutting back on helping people who needed to access those services.

The people who run these charities and groups would be unelected and therefore unaccountable, and we would see corruption proliferate as people manipulated the system - and as these charities and groups would be private associations people would have no power to challenge them or remove the people in charge of them.

The last thing we need is a society where the poor rely on charities for assistance - that would be a disgusting return to the era of workhouses, poor laws and the means test.

What we need is NATIONALISATION, in that we need to re-empower the Nationalist State as a mechanism for the advancement of our society and to benefit our people.

Under Thatcherism the defining feature of her politics was the destruction of state power, for as she privatised the public services and signed us deeper into Europe, at every level the power of the British State to act as a force of social change in British society was cut back, minimised and removed.

Blairism was merely an extension of Neo-Conservatism which is EXACTLY what Phillip Blond is.

His ideas that the emasculated remnants of the powers of the British state should be used to empower church groups, voluntary associations and charities is The Bush Doctrine - in that this is merely Neo-Conservatism.

So we see that Thatcherism became Blairism and Blairism became Neo-Conservatism and now Thatcherism is becoming Neo-Conservatism.

The circle returns full circle and we see that there is no difference between Blairism and Cameronism - both are merely variants of Thatcherism.

What we need is to end the Neo-Conservatism that led us into the Iraq War and which created the Zionist Lobby groups that dominate America and the Christian Fundamentalist lobby groups that dominate the US political right.

Cameronism will create the same situation in the UK - and that is his plan, to have the UK as zionist and dominated by the Christian zionists as in America.

The British State today is empowered only to start wars, take our taxes, arrest us for crimes and employ millions of people doing politically correct jobs like lifestyle advisers, race relations specialists and asylum seeker liason officers.

The British state is an emasculated poison dwarf, the surveillance state - what actions the state does undertake are done in the name of international finance, obeying EU dictates, removing civil liberties and abusing technology to wittle away liberty via CCTV and e mail and phone taps.

The state virtually does not function anymore as a mechanism to promote the interests of the British nation and British people.

In the absence of the British state, the power of corporations and supra-national institutions have risen to replace state power, and just like the old centralised state they have ridden roughshod over individual liberty, society and communities.

The answer is not to return to the Socialist State Model of the 1950's nor to the Thatcherite State Model of the 1980's, as both served sectarian political, corporate and social interests - we need a new state model, THE NATIONALIST STATE OF THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY.

We are dominated by Europe, the US and can do nothing to prevent the actions of international corporations who can close down British factories at a whim.

The idea that the British state has power anymore is a lie.

The British state is no longer barely functional other than as a vampire feeding upon the wealth of the people.

It takes our money and pumps politically correct poison back into society.

The idea that the NHS is something we should be proud of as part of the British state is rubbish - Most hospitals are not part of the NHS, they are independent organisations run by useless middle managers with bloated wages.

That is what cutting back the power of the state has done, it has allowed unelected, middle manager crooks to grow rich whilst exploiting the institutions they are meant to serve.

What we need is for the British State to reclaim back its powers in most sectors.

Cameron and his Red Tory chum want to perpetuate the 'withering away of the state' and like the Marxists and Trotskyites they share the same goals - a nation without borders, a state that no longer exists and a population with no loyalty to anything but themselves and consumerism and globalism.

What are these community values that Cameron trumpets - they are the community values of the colonists in our country, for community empowerment means the communities of colonists in our midst are even further empowered at our expense.

One can see a situation where Cameron creates and facilitates a Balkanised Britain, where 'empowered communities' of colonists run their own courts, their own police and their own economic systems.

What then of Britain ?

The ideas of the Red Tory are total bollocks.

Will Cameron act to remove wealth and power from his hedge fund backers, his aristocrat donors, his zionist lackeys and the super rich 1 % who own 70 % of Britains wealth ? Of course he wont.

He is handcuffed by the fact he and his party are whores to the people who fund them.

The ideas of Red Tory will not force Cameron to dump multi-culturalism, scrap political correctness and impose British culture on our country, for Cameron and the Tories are slaves to these ideologies.

Will Cameron scrap positive discrmination, affirmative action and plans to promote people on their basis of who they insert their dick into, what their skin tone is, whether they are a woman who has sex with other women or whether they worship a god from a non-British religion ?

Of course he wont.

He is as much a whore and slave to the creedo of political correctness as all the others.

Red Tory is shouting into a vacuum.

The solution is a return to re-empowering the British National State.

The British National State can then dismantle the Servile State, eradicate political correctness, remove us from the EU, reimpose national borders, recall the army to Britain and build a National banking system, deal with the excessive riches of the super rich through taxation and start to build a better British society and communities through Localised Capitalism.

We will not return to the era of the workhouses, to the era where people had to beg for charity as the state refused to take care of its own people, to a world of poor laws and the means test.

This is the vision the Tories have for Britain, a vision of the super rich in their vast land and properties whilst the poor go cap in hand to beg from charities.


Better a revolution than that.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/6636282/David-Cameron-and-Red-Torys-promise-to-heal-Britain-through-community-values.html



David Cameron and ‘Red Tory’s’ promise to heal Britain through community values
David Cameron’s new guru will today promise that Britain’s broken societies can be rebuilt by restoring community values.


By Rosa Prince, Political Correspondent
Published: 8:00AM GMT 26 Nov 2009

Known as the “Red Tory,” Phillip Blond will be watched by the Conservative leader as he unveils his radical theories for healing troubled neighbourhoods at the launch of his new think tank, ResPublica.

The former theology lecturer’s views have created a stir in Tory circles, due to his rejection of Thatcherism and the primacy of the market.

Instead, Mr Blond believes, power should be given to community groups, volunteers and church leaders to solve social problems.

His “progressive Conservative message” is known to chime with Mr Cameron’s values, although some within the party are said to be less enthusiastic about the former socialist’s message that the market does not know best.

Steve Hilton, Mr Cameron’s policy adviser who is responsible for much of the party’s recent “blue skies thinking,” and Oliver Letwin, in charge of drawing up the election manifesto, are both fans.

Mr Letwin has said: “Blond's work is seminal. He's one of the most exciting thinkers around.”

At the launch, Mr Blond will outline his view that ordinary working people have been “crowded out” from the opportunity to increase their wealth and access entrepreneurship under Labour.

But, he will add, ending the “monopoly dominance” of big private sector firms in areas such as banking and supermarkets must also be carried out in order to help the less well off.

The “Red Tory” will call for church and community groups to offer services along the model offered by the John Lewis partnership, where employees have a stake in the business.

In an interview this week, he said: "It's about capitalising on our two biggest assets – the insight and dedication of front-line staff and the engagement and involvement of citizens and communities.

"The state has bailed out the banking system but has proved incapable of saving its own citizens from debt and servitude.

"Moreover the state has arrested social mobility and destroyed the structures of working class advancement.”

Mr Blond was also scathing about Labour’s destruction of the “respectable working class,” accusing the party of fostering a form of multiculturalism which divided rather than integrated society.

He said: "And in the absence of a common British narrative that unites all peoples and classes; proper respect for other cultures and traditions has collapsed into a state sanctioned multiculturalism that has produced antagonistic communities and licensed the return of extremism and racism."

The Conservative leadership is, however, keen to make clear that Mr Cameron does not sign up for the entire “Red Tory” project.

A spokesman for Mr Cameron said: "The fact that David Cameron is appearing at this event doesn't mean that he endorses all of Phillip Blond's views."

Smash the System

I am a National Revolutionary, in that I do not want to see the system reformed - I want to see it smashed to peices, its remains ground into dust and then buried in salted earth to ensure it never grows back again.

We cannot allow this level of wealth inequality in our country, for the vast wealth reserves of the 1 % must be used by the state to assist in solving poverty, homelessness and educational under achievement.

I am not a socialist who believes that equality can be imposed via redistribution of wealth, I am a Nationalist who believes that the super rich have a duty to assist their country, people, society and communities.

Therefore the mechanism of the National State must act to ensure that the super rich hand over a percentage of their wealth to the National State in order that the wealth they hand over is put to work building schools, hospitals, creating jobs and building a better Britain.

The old system where a class of super rich land owners who also own most of the wealth can pass that on in perpetuity to their offspring and the rest of society must suffer impoverishment as a result offends me - at some time in British history a decisive break with that system must come, and in its place a new more just and equitable system imposed.

This system though must benefit only British citizens and not the host of illegal immigrants, bogus asylum seekers and economic migrants in this country.

Those useless Tory Toffs like James Bethell, whose entire wealth, power and social privilege is based on his being the one sperm amongst 20 million ejaculated by his father to reach the egg, have to finally be forced to become part of our national society - as opposed to an over privileged elite who are separated from society as a result of their wealth and land ownership.

If you are rich and British and want to live in a civilised nation, then the social inequality of just 1 % of the population owning 70 % of the wealth and land must end.

We no longer wish to live in a society of lord and peasants - that primitive form of society is a historical anachronism not a modern and sustainable Nationalist Society.

British Nationalism offers the rich a choice - co-operate with us in building a fairer and better British society or be prepared for civil war in the future.

That is the choice, for in every human society in history where the rich grow richer and the poor grow poorer we see only revolutions or civil war.

The more that our society impoverishes our people and rewards the rich, the more resentment grows.

A new form of Nationalist Class Warfare will sooner or later erupt.









http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/edmundconway/100002243/inequality-in-britain-is-of-developing-world-level/



I missed this report yesterday but it’s an interesting one. According to consultants AT Kearney, the richest 1pc in the UK hold some 70pc of the country’s wealth. That there is this divide between rich and poor is not exactly new – but the scale of it, and the likelihood that it is not being narrowed by the financial crisis, is a big worry. Indeed, according to the report, in the US the amount of financial assets owned by the richest 1pc in the US is far, far lower at 48pc, and only 34pc in Australia.

This must, to a large degree, be due to the fact that the UK set itself up in recent years as a haven for the super-rich, with its relatively generous rules on capital gains tax, because the income tax system itself is rather more redistributive than in the US. But the Kearney report is interesting because, unlike the traditional measure of inequality, the gini coefficient, it focuses not on income (the flow of money) but on actual substantive wealth (the stack of it that sits beneath us).

Says Penney Frohling, a partner at AT Kearney: “To understand the impact of the market crash, though, you need to look at wealth – not just how much people hold, but how it is held across different asset types. This is harder to do but drives quite different insights about how deeply and how widely the market crash and subsequent recovery have affected investors across age and wealth bands.”

“On an income basis, the UK and Australia have similar levels of equality according to the UN, with the US having proportionately more very high- and very low-earners. But in terms of the distribution of what people own rather than what they earn, the UK picture is more like an emerging market – though of course at a higher level.”

In the latest UN report on the gini coefficient (in which a score of 0 means absolutely equal income across the population and 100 means one person has all the income), the UK scored 36.0, Australia 35.2, USA: 40.8.

In part the poor score for the UK is due to its relatively ungenerous pension provision, compared with Australia where there is a compulsory pension savings scheme.

But what I find particularly intriguing (and this is something which won’t be clear for another year or more) is the question of whether this crisis has levelled out those inequality gaps. The Great Depression and its aftermath most certainly did, but despite the fact that the gini coefficient (certainly in the US, probably in the UK) are at levels comparable with the late 1920s and early 1930s, we haven’t yet seen any kind of dramatic social backlash as a result.

From Punk Hero to Panto Dame - The Joke That Is John Lydon

Image - I fucking love money me. I will pimp my arse to any corporation for a few quid.







John Lydon of The Sex Pistols, Public Image Limited and corporate whore of Country Life Butter has had a pop at the BNP.

I guess he needs to lick a few media arses now that he has a new tour.

Lydon epitomises the modern tragedy, his life charting the fall from revolutionary firebrand to corporate whore.

The path from punk hero to panto dame is an easy one.

First you make a few quid, then you get used to people kissing your arse, then you start enjoying the money and fame - and then you sell your soul and become another plastic joke.

This is why I despise most modern music - its fake music for fake people.

As for Lydon - he talks out of his arse.

Lydon says 'Britain is an island and benefits from immigration' - but today we have so much immigration that Britain is now a people carrier not an island that can feed and take care of its own people.

Our national BRITISH culture is dying from multi-culturalism and idiots like Lydon want to fuck around on stage regurgitating songs from the early eighties as a way to tranquilise our people with inane pop culture and the opiate of nostalgia.

The idea that immigration has made Britain a 'better place' is a statement that could only come from the mouth of a rich, over arse licked, pompous pop star who lives in Los Angeles.

Lydon should shut the fuck up about Britain, as he aint even British anymore.

He is another ex-pat 'cosmopolitan' pop star arsehole whose loyalty is to money and fame, not people or nation.

He has become a parody of himself, the young John Lydon would despise the contemporary John Lydon.

No real rock stars should live beyond thirty.

Only those with real integrity, who are the muses of the moment and whose music defines the Zeitgeist, have the integrity to die before they become parodies of themselves.

To watch men in their fifties with dyed orange hair, trying to act like some 'threat' to the system when they are the bastions of the corporate system itself is simply embarrasing.

Any punk star who goes on a nostalgia tour is a wanker.

Anyone who goes to see them is a total fucking mug.

Watching fat, middle aged men trying to act like punk rockers is frankly a total embarassment.

John Lydon - panto dame and disposable plastic pop star, prostitute to the corporate media.


Our culture has become so debased that the witterings of pop stars and idiot actors like Stephen Fry have taken on significance. Instead of them being regarded as simply the pathetic glitter monkeys they are who are paid to entertain and tranquilise the masses as part of the Corporate Circus, people take these cock ends seriously.

The only real rock stars are dead.

The rest are corporate whores who make music for morons.

I would say that apart from a few people like Axel Rose, Trent Reznor, Bob Dylan and Willie Nelson, people who refuse to play by the rules of the corporate system, they are all like Lydon - corporate whores and panto dames.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/rockandpopfeatures/6654809/John-Lydon-interview.html

Now 53, he unashamedly sports the bright-orange, spiky hair of his youth, and revels in firing off withering asides about cultural developments at home, from Gordon Ramsay (“he only got famous by stealing my Anglo-Saxon vocabulary”), and Harry Redknapp (“a dodgy car salesman”), to the BNP.

“If ever anybody got the Sex Pistols wrong, it was that lot,” he says, referring to the fascist skinheads, who appropriated the Pistols’ sound in the late 1970s. “Britain’s an island, it’s always had a constant ebb and flow of immigration, it makes it a better place. And there’s not a BNP hooligan in existence that can do without his curry on a Saturday night, right?” He laughs, scornfully. “There’s no brain challenge with these morons.”

Lydon’s own dalliances in mainstream culture have, however, earnt him equally scathing criticism: does the original punk rocker have any business starring in a TV advert for Country Life butter? He impatiently argues that such projects have enabled him to finance his PiL reunion.

John Bercow - The Grima Wormtongue of Parliament

Image - John Bercow, the Grima wormtongue of Parliament, a poison dwarf whose words seek to corrupte the democratic political process.






The speaker of the house of commons, John Bercow MP is a Jew.

We know this as Bercow made an issue of his Jewish ethnicity in a speech to the Youth Parliament of Britain a few weeks ago when he had a pop at the BNP.

So Bercow proposes a plan that will allow people like him, who are Jews, to get into Parliament above white non-Jewish people.

Not because of their talents, skills as a politicians or because of work in their communities, wisdom or fitness for office - but simply because they are Jews, or black or asian or Muslim etc etc.

Just as long as they are not British and White.

Once upon a time this was called CORRUPTION, when someone changed the rules to enable their friends and supporters to benefit whilst disadvantaging others.

This plan of Bercow is nothing more than a plan to stuff Parliament with his own people, whilst denying the indigenous British people the same rights to access the political process.

After Hubris comes Nemesis - and Bercow should remember that.





http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230970/Female-Black-Gay-All-Then-youre-likely-MP-controversial-new-plans.html


Female? Black? Gay? All three? Then you're more likely to become an MP under controversial new plans

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 10:35 PM on 25th November 2009

* Comments (0)
* Add to My Stories

Speaker of The House of Commons John Bercow

Controversial: Commons Speaker John Bercow backs the new plans

Controversial plans were unveiled yesterday to force political parties to make Parliament less white, male, middle-class and heterosexual.

Under proposals backed by Commons Speaker John Bercow, but labelled as 'insulting' by former Tory minister Ann Widdecombe, parties will be made to declare publicly how many women, ethnic minority, gay and disabled applicants they reject as potential Parliamentary candidates.

Parties also face demands to ensure at least half the MPs leaving Parliament at the next election - in what is expected to be the biggest exodus since 1945 - are replaced by women.

The proposals have emerged from a crossparty review set up by former Commons Speaker Michael Martin - and taken forward by his successor, Mr Bercow - on how to make the chamber more representative.

In an interim report published yesterday, the panel said parties must be made to be more transparent about the people putting themselves forward as would-be MPs.

The report said: 'The fact remains that, at present, the House of Commons continues to be largely white, male, middle-aged and middle-class: people from under-represented groups who are putting themselves forward for selection are still proportionately less likely to be selected.'

The report goes on to call for half of the MPs leaving Parliament at next year's election to be replaced by women and to support a big increase in black, Asian, disabled and gay MPs.

But the proposals were condemned by Miss Widdecombe. She said: 'The concept of merit is going out of the window.

'I don't care whether an MP is male or female, black or white, rich or poor, old or young. It doesn't matter.

'It's frankly insulting because it suggests women and ethnic minorities cannot get there on their own merit.'