A few days ago I had the pleasure of being banned from the Pickled Politics site by the mafia of the mediocre, the moderators, that run the site.
This was after the site put up an article about Nick Griffin speaking at the Oxford Union, where they stated that though Nick and the BNP had a right to free speech that the BNP were a nasty, despicable organisation with nothing to say and that its ideas and views could be combated and torn apart as easily as a wet kleenex in the hands of a sobbing liberal.
http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1551
The site says it stands for free speech and that the 'intellectuals' were ready to 'demolish' the arguments the BNP put forward.
BIG MISTAKE.
I trotted along their and began posting a few comments in response to the vapid and asinine comments being posted on the site by the regulars who post on the site. No problem for a while.
The arguments put forward by the people that post on the site were so pathetic that I wasnt sure at first if they were taking the piss.
They werent.
They really are that dumb.
For example one person called Morgoth wrote the following
" Therefore my question: do we possess the right to pursue conditions conducive to our survival?
Survival? Kelly Holmes (to take one example) is 100, no, a million times the Briton than Nick Griffen could ever hope to be. And the future of this country is assured with shining eggs like her about.
Lets have, as Rumbold (I think) said upthread, lots more inter-”racial” marriages - the sooner a shitty little inconsequntial accident of nature (skin colour) is made irrelevant beyond the point of total irrelevance the better."
I replied " Oh yes, just what we need as a society and a nation to ensure our future survival in a world where Peak Oil is about to hit and Eco-Conflicts begin is to allow people to enter and live in our country simply on the basis that they can run really, really fast. That the British people and British nation and British culture that has created such brilliant minds as Darwin, Newton, Stephenson, Charles Merz, Brunel, Dickens, Shakespeare, Roger Bacon, William Blake, Robert Grosseteste, Alexander Fleming, Charles Babbage, Tim Berners-Lee, Milton , Hobbes, Thomas Paine etc etc etc needs now to be surrendered so as to allow immigrants into our country and then justify their presence by saying they can run fast.
Pathetic.
That we should surrender our culture, ancestral rights and liberties and free speech just so that these immigrants who can run fast do not have to hear us complaining about the betrayal of all the wars and sacrifices our ancestors fought to keep our nation free.
As for the 'inconsequential' nature of our race, ask anyone from an ethnic minority if they feel their race is inconsequential. It is only white, self hating liberals who despise their own race as they have adopted the conditioned reflexive self hating guilt that Orwell wrote about. No other race but the whites want to destroy themselves or spend so much time on their knees pleading for forgiveness for the colour of their skin."
The comments that I had then managed to post a few times, then suddenly stopped.
A strange message then began to appear on the screen saying the site was now 'stopping spam' and that the moderators would vet the posts before putting them up.
Guess what - not one of the comments I put on the site were then allowed to go onto the site.
The mafia of the mediocre had decided to censor me and stop my free speech.
Pickled Politics had become proffesional hypocrites.
This is not unusual. I have done radio interviews before where the presenter has begun the interview before going live by saying that that he would allow me to stay on the show and debate with me.
Then when I have torn him and his arguments to pieces from the start, by the first break in the show I am usually removed.
What happens is that the media believe their own propaganda about us.
They say 'these people are thick, we can tear their arguments to pieces and they have no ideas we cannot destroy with our mighty brains' but then once they have to debate us, they realise that we are in fact intellectually and politically far superior to them.
All that the policy of No Platform has done is ensure that the journalists have gotten used to debating with the idiots of the mainstream parties.
Journalists are no longer capable of debating with us, as the quality of journalists is no longer such that they can debate with us.
For decades they have gotten used to debating with the idiots, middle ranking minds and muppets.
This is why they no longer debate with us, as they are now so dumbed down that they cannot win the debate.
Its like watching pygmies in a boxing ring boxing each other, whilst the real heavweight fighters have been forced to stand outside the ring in silence and watch as the pygmies are crowned the heavy weight champs of the world.
No Platform is another example, like way exams are made easier in schools, of our society dumbing down.
To ensure that the stupidscan feel good, the intelligent are either forced to become as stupid as the stupids or else are censored and ignored.
This is why we now live in an Idiocracy, where the idiot is the ideal.
This is also why programmes like Question Time and other political 'current affairs' shows are now so bloody boring.
Year after year, series after series, the same old boring politicians are hauled on to tell the same old boring bullshit to the British public.
Its like watching the political version of Jurassic Park, where only political dinosaurs are allowed to bellow and blow live on air.
Poor old Dimbelby must be bored rigid, it must be like Groundhog Day in the Question Time offices.
Things have to be bad if they invite Nigel Farrage on Question Time. To have the Kermit the Frog lookalike who runs a party filled with prostitute banging, corrupt, EU cash trough gorging, reactionary old farts on Question Time is a classic sign of morbidity.
That parrot is now deceased.
Those that say the Internet is the last bastion of free speech are deluding themselves.
Free speech is not free debate.
The Internet does not allow free debate, as the mafia of the mediocre that are the moderators on sites such as Pickled Politics, censor anyone they cannot intellectually contain and nullify.
Its like saying ' Here we have free speech ' and then denying anyone they cannot win a debate with access to the debating chamber.
It is nothing more than pure hypocrisy.
Here is my challenge - to anyone who thinks they can defeat me in a free and fair public debate on any political issues then get in touch.
Let me know where and when and we will have the debate. But I wont hold my breath.
Pickled Politics can kiss my proud, hairy, White, Anglo-Saxon arse.
Sunday, 2 December 2007
Rodney King and the Liberal Idiots
Who remembers the case of Rodney King, the PCP snorting, drink driving, arrest resisting thug who get a great ass whopping off of the LA cops.
Seeing that beating on the BBC was one of the few times it was worth paying for the TV license fee.
At the time we all were subjected to the bullshit it was police brutality and racism.
It seems that even today many mugs like Catherine Ellsworth of The Telegraph still appear to believe it ;
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/catherineelsworth/dec07/rodney-king-uncomfortable.htm
The idea Rondkey King could EVER have been an 'icon of tolerance' makes us much sense as using Satan as an icon of Christianity.
The first time I saw the news and film of Rodney King getting a major ass kicking I winced as the usual cacophany of cries from the usual suspects of 'police brutality, racism blah, blah, blah ' went up from the media.
After I was told by a poster on an alternative news site that King had been drunk and on PCP when he was arrested and had also assaulted the officers BEFORE the segment of the film that was shown on the news, then as I watched the video of his ass whopping with a new perspective.
I was cheering the cops on to ever more heights of brutality.
" Taser the fucker " I screamed with atavistic glee at the TV screen " Beat that bastards ass , get out the pepper spray , kick him more, smash him with the truncheon ".
Oh he glee of it , finally watching a PCP crazed drunk driver who resisted arrest get what they so richly deserved.
The law no longer punishes the criminals, especially if they are black in America, as the white liberal lawyers always play the race card to get them off ( O.J. Simpson, Michael Jackson etc etc ) so this was true restorative justice.
I have lost friends to drunk drivers, seen the carnage of it and the fallout of such an event.
I wanted that prick mashed into a pulp to ensure he NEVER drunk drove again.
Instead the media created the riots by saying it was racist and brutality, weakened the authority of the police and ensured that King had a perpetual ' YOU ARE BLACK SO GET OUT OF JAIL FREE ' card that he could play whenever he was arrested in the future.
The cops sure dont want another LA race riot, so King is now an untouchable.
This is Rodney Kings rap sheet since his ass whooping as listed in the LA times ;
* In May 1991, he was arrested on suspicion of trying to run over a vice officer who allegedly found him with a transvestite prostitute in Hollywood, but no charges were filed.
* In 1993, King entered an alcohol rehabilitation program and was placed on probation after crashing his vehicle into a block wall in downtown Los Angeles with a blood-alcohol level twice the legal limit.
* In July 1995, he was arrested by Alhambra police, who alleged that he hit his wife with his car, knocking her to the ground. He was sentenced to 90 days in jail after being convicted of hit-and-run.
* In 1999, he was sentenced to 90 days in San Bernardino County jail and put on probation for four years after a domestic dispute involving one of his daughters and her mother. He was required to attend a batterer's treatment program and a child-abuse program, according to court records.
* In 2001, King was ordered to attend a yearlong drug treatment program after he was arrested for indecent exposure and being under the influence of PCP at Ganesha Park in Pomona.
* In April 2003, Rialto police watched him weave through traffic in his Ford Expedition at more than 100 mph before plowing through a fence and into a San Bernardino house. He pleaded guilty to being under the influence of PCP and was sentenced to a six-month drug rehabilitation program followed by a 120-day jail sentence.
* That October, Rialto police arrested King on suspicion of punching his girlfriend in the stomach.
Susan Mickey, a spokeswoman for the San Bernardino County district attorney, said the office declined to prosecute the domestic violence case in 2003 and a subsequent September 2005 domestic violence case because of a lack of evidence.
In the September 2005 incident, King was arrested on suspicion of threatening to kill one of his daughters and her mother after the two women argued with his then-girlfriend, the Associated Press reported at the time.
In the last six to eight months, Rialto police have been to King's home numerous times, but for quieter calls.
"It was normal neighborhood stuff . . . drinking and loud parties, stuff like that," said Lewis, the Rialto police sergeant.
Fuck me - I dont know what kind of neighbourhood this cops comes from, but I wouldnt want to live next door to him.
It appears that in fact King wasnt beaten hard enough, and that the money he got as compensation merely funded his drug habit and drink driving.
He can crash one car, then buy another courtesy of LA police.
The lesson in all of this is this ;
the next time the media tell something is true, dont believe it.
Doubt is an expression of a free adult mind, whilst believing what you are told is simply what children do.
Dont be a child - doubt the media and their bullshit and make your own mind up.
Now watch the old tapes of the Rodney King beating and enjoy.
Seeing that beating on the BBC was one of the few times it was worth paying for the TV license fee.
At the time we all were subjected to the bullshit it was police brutality and racism.
It seems that even today many mugs like Catherine Ellsworth of The Telegraph still appear to believe it ;
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/catherineelsworth/dec07/rodney-king-uncomfortable.htm
The idea Rondkey King could EVER have been an 'icon of tolerance' makes us much sense as using Satan as an icon of Christianity.
The first time I saw the news and film of Rodney King getting a major ass kicking I winced as the usual cacophany of cries from the usual suspects of 'police brutality, racism blah, blah, blah ' went up from the media.
After I was told by a poster on an alternative news site that King had been drunk and on PCP when he was arrested and had also assaulted the officers BEFORE the segment of the film that was shown on the news, then as I watched the video of his ass whopping with a new perspective.
I was cheering the cops on to ever more heights of brutality.
" Taser the fucker " I screamed with atavistic glee at the TV screen " Beat that bastards ass , get out the pepper spray , kick him more, smash him with the truncheon ".
Oh he glee of it , finally watching a PCP crazed drunk driver who resisted arrest get what they so richly deserved.
The law no longer punishes the criminals, especially if they are black in America, as the white liberal lawyers always play the race card to get them off ( O.J. Simpson, Michael Jackson etc etc ) so this was true restorative justice.
I have lost friends to drunk drivers, seen the carnage of it and the fallout of such an event.
I wanted that prick mashed into a pulp to ensure he NEVER drunk drove again.
Instead the media created the riots by saying it was racist and brutality, weakened the authority of the police and ensured that King had a perpetual ' YOU ARE BLACK SO GET OUT OF JAIL FREE ' card that he could play whenever he was arrested in the future.
The cops sure dont want another LA race riot, so King is now an untouchable.
This is Rodney Kings rap sheet since his ass whooping as listed in the LA times ;
* In May 1991, he was arrested on suspicion of trying to run over a vice officer who allegedly found him with a transvestite prostitute in Hollywood, but no charges were filed.
* In 1993, King entered an alcohol rehabilitation program and was placed on probation after crashing his vehicle into a block wall in downtown Los Angeles with a blood-alcohol level twice the legal limit.
* In July 1995, he was arrested by Alhambra police, who alleged that he hit his wife with his car, knocking her to the ground. He was sentenced to 90 days in jail after being convicted of hit-and-run.
* In 1999, he was sentenced to 90 days in San Bernardino County jail and put on probation for four years after a domestic dispute involving one of his daughters and her mother. He was required to attend a batterer's treatment program and a child-abuse program, according to court records.
* In 2001, King was ordered to attend a yearlong drug treatment program after he was arrested for indecent exposure and being under the influence of PCP at Ganesha Park in Pomona.
* In April 2003, Rialto police watched him weave through traffic in his Ford Expedition at more than 100 mph before plowing through a fence and into a San Bernardino house. He pleaded guilty to being under the influence of PCP and was sentenced to a six-month drug rehabilitation program followed by a 120-day jail sentence.
* That October, Rialto police arrested King on suspicion of punching his girlfriend in the stomach.
Susan Mickey, a spokeswoman for the San Bernardino County district attorney, said the office declined to prosecute the domestic violence case in 2003 and a subsequent September 2005 domestic violence case because of a lack of evidence.
In the September 2005 incident, King was arrested on suspicion of threatening to kill one of his daughters and her mother after the two women argued with his then-girlfriend, the Associated Press reported at the time.
In the last six to eight months, Rialto police have been to King's home numerous times, but for quieter calls.
"It was normal neighborhood stuff . . . drinking and loud parties, stuff like that," said Lewis, the Rialto police sergeant.
Fuck me - I dont know what kind of neighbourhood this cops comes from, but I wouldnt want to live next door to him.
It appears that in fact King wasnt beaten hard enough, and that the money he got as compensation merely funded his drug habit and drink driving.
He can crash one car, then buy another courtesy of LA police.
The lesson in all of this is this ;
the next time the media tell something is true, dont believe it.
Doubt is an expression of a free adult mind, whilst believing what you are told is simply what children do.
Dont be a child - doubt the media and their bullshit and make your own mind up.
Now watch the old tapes of the Rodney King beating and enjoy.
2007 Stupid Bitch Award
Yep folks, its that time of year again, its the 2007 Stupid Bitch Award.
This year there is no challenger for the title of ' The most stupid bitch of 2007 awards' as the uncontestable champion is ...........
Gillian Gibbons.
Yep, thats right - its the dumb liberal bitch who went to Sudan as part of her attempt to 'cleanse' her soul of inherited white guilt due to the Empire / racism / Coca Cola / pink spangly pop socks / the Wombles etc etc etc etc.
Not content with being jailed for calling a teddy bear Muhammed, the silly bitch now has said " "I don't want any resentment towards Muslim people."
Dont worry about that Gillian, we are not resentful towards Muslims.
Thats because YOU are the idiot and it is you who deserves all you get.
To be honest I think they should have given the dumb bitch to the screaming mob, so she could really 'understand' the nature of the people she was living amidst in the Sudanese Sharia Law state. The people of those states choose to live under Sharia Law, so if she really wanted to 'understand' the Sudanese people and 'understand' Islamic Sharia law then she should have been handed to the mob.
I feel no resentment towards Muslims, the people of Sudan or Islam.
I may look at the news and think 'what a bunch of savages', but then again so did Churchill.
They are simply what they are and nothing more.
Its their rat hole, their idiotic laws and their religion.
As Churchill wrote in a passage from The River War, Churchill's account of Kitchener's campaign in Sudan in which he fought alongside Kitchener, which described shortcomings in "Mohammedanism" - Islam.
It said: "Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.
"The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
"A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity."
It is the white cringing, self guilt afflicted idiots like Gibbons who go to these places, get arrested, scream for the British government to come and help them out (at British tax payers expense) who deserve all they get when they allow their facile liberal illusions to overcome reality.
This years winner case is an exceptional case also for many other reasons.
First of all she lives in Liverpool, one of the most deprived cities in Britain with rampant child poverty and under educational achievement, yet instead of helping local children in Liverpool she chose to use her teaching skills ( which the tax payer funded when it put her through university ) to try and teach children in Sudan. This excercise in futility was bound to fail from the start as the governments of most Muslim states only teach children to read so that the kids can then read the Koran as part of their brainwashing process. Reading is not about liberation of the intellect in Islamic states operating under Sharia Law, but about ensuring the populace are educated to just the right level of Islamist ignorance.
Its like those kids in Madrassas in Pakistan and Afghanistan where you see them hunched over a copy of the Koran in rows, their bodies rocking to and forth as though in the grip of some autistic seizure, as they are forced to repeat passage after passage of the Koran until it is burnt into the synapses of their young brains.
In this country we would close those 'schools' down, arrest the teachers and prosecute them for child abuse.
But the Liberals say in the name of Cultural Relativism that it is not abuse and we must not attack their culture - if the Klingons invaded Earth the Liberals would say we should be tolerant of them in the name of racial and cultural tolerance.
British people that go to work in countries like Sudan, and British businesses that trade with states like Sudan, should be arrested for assisting the war crimes and crimes against humanity of those states.
The fact that the British government is sending hundreds of millions of pounds a year of development aid to the Sudan is nothing more than us feeding the butchers to ensure they keep cutting the meat off their victims.
Sudan is a genocidal, slave trading, Rape State where the Arab government is murdering millions of black Africans in a racist rampage of home burning and killing.
As is typical in a Sharia Law state, slavery is accepted as slavery is condoned in the Koran.
33:50 - "Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sla_sud.htm
For a full expose of slavery and Islam read here ;
http://www.uq.net.au/slsoc/manussa/tr05manu.htm#N_5_
http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/slavery.htm
Gillian has now said " I would like to stay in Sudan ".
We wish you would too Gillian.
Thats one idiotic Labour voter out of the way for the next general election.
The great writer Gibbons once wrote of the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire - this Gibbons is symbolic of the rise and fall of Great Britain.
When we spit out saps like that stupid bitch from our society, then no clearer sign exists that we are also in the same fall as a nation as that which once afflicted Rome.
This year there is no challenger for the title of ' The most stupid bitch of 2007 awards' as the uncontestable champion is ...........
Gillian Gibbons.
Yep, thats right - its the dumb liberal bitch who went to Sudan as part of her attempt to 'cleanse' her soul of inherited white guilt due to the Empire / racism / Coca Cola / pink spangly pop socks / the Wombles etc etc etc etc.
Not content with being jailed for calling a teddy bear Muhammed, the silly bitch now has said " "I don't want any resentment towards Muslim people."
Dont worry about that Gillian, we are not resentful towards Muslims.
Thats because YOU are the idiot and it is you who deserves all you get.
To be honest I think they should have given the dumb bitch to the screaming mob, so she could really 'understand' the nature of the people she was living amidst in the Sudanese Sharia Law state. The people of those states choose to live under Sharia Law, so if she really wanted to 'understand' the Sudanese people and 'understand' Islamic Sharia law then she should have been handed to the mob.
I feel no resentment towards Muslims, the people of Sudan or Islam.
I may look at the news and think 'what a bunch of savages', but then again so did Churchill.
They are simply what they are and nothing more.
Its their rat hole, their idiotic laws and their religion.
As Churchill wrote in a passage from The River War, Churchill's account of Kitchener's campaign in Sudan in which he fought alongside Kitchener, which described shortcomings in "Mohammedanism" - Islam.
It said: "Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.
"The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
"A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity."
It is the white cringing, self guilt afflicted idiots like Gibbons who go to these places, get arrested, scream for the British government to come and help them out (at British tax payers expense) who deserve all they get when they allow their facile liberal illusions to overcome reality.
This years winner case is an exceptional case also for many other reasons.
First of all she lives in Liverpool, one of the most deprived cities in Britain with rampant child poverty and under educational achievement, yet instead of helping local children in Liverpool she chose to use her teaching skills ( which the tax payer funded when it put her through university ) to try and teach children in Sudan. This excercise in futility was bound to fail from the start as the governments of most Muslim states only teach children to read so that the kids can then read the Koran as part of their brainwashing process. Reading is not about liberation of the intellect in Islamic states operating under Sharia Law, but about ensuring the populace are educated to just the right level of Islamist ignorance.
Its like those kids in Madrassas in Pakistan and Afghanistan where you see them hunched over a copy of the Koran in rows, their bodies rocking to and forth as though in the grip of some autistic seizure, as they are forced to repeat passage after passage of the Koran until it is burnt into the synapses of their young brains.
In this country we would close those 'schools' down, arrest the teachers and prosecute them for child abuse.
But the Liberals say in the name of Cultural Relativism that it is not abuse and we must not attack their culture - if the Klingons invaded Earth the Liberals would say we should be tolerant of them in the name of racial and cultural tolerance.
British people that go to work in countries like Sudan, and British businesses that trade with states like Sudan, should be arrested for assisting the war crimes and crimes against humanity of those states.
The fact that the British government is sending hundreds of millions of pounds a year of development aid to the Sudan is nothing more than us feeding the butchers to ensure they keep cutting the meat off their victims.
Sudan is a genocidal, slave trading, Rape State where the Arab government is murdering millions of black Africans in a racist rampage of home burning and killing.
As is typical in a Sharia Law state, slavery is accepted as slavery is condoned in the Koran.
33:50 - "Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sla_sud.htm
For a full expose of slavery and Islam read here ;
http://www.uq.net.au/slsoc/manussa/tr05manu.htm#N_5_
http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/slavery.htm
Gillian has now said " I would like to stay in Sudan ".
We wish you would too Gillian.
Thats one idiotic Labour voter out of the way for the next general election.
The great writer Gibbons once wrote of the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire - this Gibbons is symbolic of the rise and fall of Great Britain.
When we spit out saps like that stupid bitch from our society, then no clearer sign exists that we are also in the same fall as a nation as that which once afflicted Rome.
Saturday, 1 December 2007
Is George Galloway a Sawney Bean clone ?
Did anyone else see George Galloway being interviewed on the News at Ten outside the Oxford demonstration ?
I was shocked at how much like the famous Scottish cannibal , Sawney Bean, he looked like. I guess the genes are beginning to arrange into their proper form as he gets older.
With a stare that could neuter a pole cat at forty yards, a smile that could terrify a rabid rat into submission and a sincerity that has as much substance as angel delight - the man is obviously a deeply disturbed individual.
As I have repeated before he is beginning to resemble a sewer rat on meth amphetamine.
Now that Respect have effectively disintegrated into another Cult of personality around him and his ego, it appears that the Sharia Socialist Front is now limited to the Isle Of Bangladesh, formerly known as the Isle of Dogs.
Never mind there will always be a place for him in the Gaza strip alongside the butchers of Hamas.
From Gorgeous George to the ghost of genocide past.
One minute cock of the walk, the next - well, just a cock.
Truth and Lies About the BNP
The Top 10 Lies About The BNP.
1) Lie Number 1 - The British people support immigration -
Total lie. Read the Daily Mail report on public opinions December 1st 2007 ;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=498808&in_page_id=1770
77 % WANT IMMIGRATION STRICTLY LIMITED
52 % SAY THERE SHOULD BE LESS THAN 10,000 PER YEAR ALLOWED INTO BRITAIN
68 % SAY GOVERNMENT USELESS ON IMMIGRATION
87 % SAY MIGRANTS SHOULD LEARN ENGLISH
37 % SAY TOO MANY ILLEGALS ARE ENTERING THE COUNTRY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Lie Number 2 - Diversity is good for society
http://home.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/debenoist/alain6.html
Peaceful modern societies which respect the individual evolved from age-old familistic ties. The transition from band-type societies, through clan and tribal organizations, into nation-states was peaceful only when accomplished without disruption of the basic ties which link the individual to the larger society by a sense of a common history, culture and kinship. The sense of "belonging" to a nation by virtue of such shared ties promotes cooperation, altruism and respect for other members. In modern times, traditional ties have been weakened by the rise of mass societies and rapid global communication, factors which bring with them rapid social change and new philosophies which deny the significance of the sense of nationhood, and emphasize individualism and individualistic goals. The cohesion of societies has consequently been threatened, and replaced by multicultural and multi-ethnic societies and the overwhelming sense of lost identity in the mass global society in which Western man, at least, has come to conceive himself as belonging.
Sociologically, the first theorist to identify this change was the Arab scholar, Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), who emphasized the tendency for mass urban societies to break down when the social solidarity characteristic of tribal and national societies disappeared. Ibn Khaldun saw dramatically the contrast between the morality of the nationalistic and ethnically unified Berbers of North Africa and the motley collation of peoples who called themselves Arabs under Arabic leadership, but did not possess the unity and sense of identity that had made the relatively small population of true Arabs who had built a widespread and Arabic-speaking Empire. Later it was Ferdinand Tonnies (1855-1936) who introduced this thought to modern sociology. He did so in his theory of gemeinschaft and gesellschaft (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, 1887). This theory revealed how early tribal or national (gemeinschaft) societies achieved harmonious collaboration and cooperation more or less automatically due to the common culture and sense of common genetic and cultural identity in which all members were raised. This avoided major conflicts concerning basic values since all shared a common set of mores and a common sense of destiny. However, as history progressed, larger multi-ethnic and multi-cultural societies began to develop, and these Tonnies described as being united by gesellschaft ties. These were not united by any common set of values or historical identity, and collaboration was only maintained due to the need to exchange goods and services. In short, their existence came to depend on economic relations, and as a result of the diversity of cultural values, the lack of any "family feeling," and the emphasis on economic exchange and economic wealth, conflict over wealth and basic values was likely to disrupt the harmony of such societies at any time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Lie Number 3 - The British public regard the BNP policies as abhorrent ;
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13520516,00.html
The internet pollster YouGov questioned 1,841 people between last Friday and Monday.
They were asked whether they supported halting all further immigration to the UK.
Nearly six out of 10 - 59% - who did not know it was a BNP plan, said they would back the idea.
The average level of support for the BNP's ideas was 55% among those who were not told where they had come from.
Among those who knew it was 49%.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Lie Number 4 - The BNP is racist because it wants to stop immigration ;
If the BNP are racist then so are the Asians in the UK - 60 % of them want an end to all further immigration. The question is why are the BNP called 'racists' but the asians arent - is it because the BNP are white, and if so isnt that racist to have one standard applied to those with brown or black skins and one for people with white skins ;
A poll by the BBC's Asian Network radio station shows that 60% of British Asians say there are too many immigrants in Britain.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/frontpage/4514245.stm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5) Lie Number 5 - Only whites commit racist attacks and ethnic minorities are the primary victims of race attacks in Britain ;
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1928559,00.html
Nearly half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white, according to official figures released by the Home Office.
The data, released under Freedom of Information legislation, shows that between 1995 and 2004 there have been 58 murders where the police consider a racial element played a key part. Out of these, 24 have been where the murder victim was white.
The disclosure will add to the intense debate over multiculturalism in British society. The figures also overturn the assumption that almost all racial murders are committed against ethnic minority victims.
Overall, there have been 10 black victims and 16 Asian victims. Of the 58 race murders, 18 have been where a white attacker has killed a black or Asian individual and another 14 where one member of a minority group has murdered another for racial reasons.
The most recent analysis shows that in 2004, 87,000 people from black or minority ethnic communities (BME) said they had been a victim of a racially motivated crime. In the same period, 92,000 white people said they had also fallen victim.
Focusing on violent racial attacks, 49,000 BME were victims. Among whites, the number was 77,000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6128466.stm
Most of the offenders (57%) in the racially motivated crimes identified in the British Crime Survey are not white. White victims said 82% of offenders were not white.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6) Lie Number 6 - Immigration profits Britain ;
http://www.migrationwatchuk.com/faqs.asp
In a recent parliamentary debate, a Home Office Minister gave an official estimate that "migration has increased output by at least £4 billion and (accounts for) 10 - 15% of economic trend growth" But the Government had failed to take into account the addition to population. In 2005 net immigration was 185,000 which, on a population of 60 million, is 0.31%. At the same time the government’s estimate of £4 billion on a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of approximately £1,250 billion is 0.32%. The benefit in terms of GDP per head is therefore trivial – about 0.01% of GDP or just 4p per head per week – less than a Mars bar per month.
As for the claim that migration accounts for 10 - 15% of trend growth, the result is the same. Trend growth is 2.5% so 10-15% of trend growth is 0.25% to 0.375% of GDP. The effect on GDP per head is therefore a small negative or positive amount.
Other recent studies in the UK, and studies carried out in other countries, point to the same conclusion – namely that immigration makes little difference to GDP per head.
We know where the government can stick their Mars Bar.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7) Lie Number 7 - Immigration has no effect on house prices ;
Seven out of eight regions consulted for an official report on immigration's effect on housing said the influx had caused problems.
Council house waiting lists have soared to record levels. Homelessness has also become a problem among migrants in some regions.
The arrival of 1.8 million foreign workers in three years has also had an impact on rents and private housing. Between 1997 and 2005, the last period for which figures are available, 592,000 homes were needed for immigrants.
But only 25,596 new social housing homes were built in 2006.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8) Lie Number 8 - Immigrants have no effect on the NHS ;
http://www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/hiv_and_sti/default.htm
The latest report from the Health Protection Agency shows that the major source of heterosexual HIV infection in the UK is immigration from sub Saharan Africa. 70% of all heterosexual cases diagnosed in the UK are among those born in Africa. Of those diagnosed in 2006, nearly half (46%) were described as Black African.
Among black Africans in Britain TB rose by over 100% between the end of the 1980s and early 1990s.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/medical_notes/100618.stm
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1670457.ece
Nor do we need foreign doctors in the UK to run the NHS ;
http://migration-watchuk.org/Briefingpapers/health/foreign_nurses.asp
http://student.bmj.com/issues/07/11/life/392.php
The NHS is causing mass deaths in Developing nations due to stealing their doctors and nurses ;
In February 2000, a United Nations conference opened to discuss the plundering of much-needed professionals from Africa by Western nations. The UN Economic Commission on Africa stated that this ‘brain drain’ was a major obstacle to African development. One commission analyst estimated that over 30% of Africa’s skilled labour was working overseas.
In October 2003, the World Health Organisation voiced growing concern over the poaching of doctors from the developing world. South Africa is now forced to recruit health professionals from China and Cuba - it has lost so many to Britain and other Western nations. Less wealthy African nations must do without.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/articles/foreign_nurses.htm
• In 2001, the UK faced a barrage of criticism from southern Africa for pilfering teachers.
• During 2002, some 2114 South African nurses came to Britain looking for work and neighbouring Botswana lost 120 of its nurses to the UK.
• From 2002 to 2003, 13,000 non-EU foreign nurses registered to work in the UK. 3,472 of these came from the developing world.
• By October 2003, around 7000 South African doctors were on the permanent register of the UK General Medical Council.
Pictures of fishing boats laden with Africans beaching in the Canary Islands seem to have struck a chord in Europe. But they are only one aspect of a massive exodus from this continent. Far more important is that countless European hospitals – particularly those in Britain - are filled with doctors and nurses from Africa.
Many thousands of expensively trained Africans, with invaluable skills, are helping wealthy patients in the well-equipped hospitals of the rich world. Meanwhile, the health services in their own countries are collapsing.
I would argue that this loss of skilled people is the biggest millstone around Africa’s neck. The familiar issues of “aid and trade” pale into insignificance compared with the fact that so many of Africa’s brightest and best leave this continent as soon as they can and never return.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/davidblair/may06/humancapital.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9) Lie Number 9 - The BNP stands for compulsory repatriation and will send all the immigrants back home ;
http://www.bnp.org.uk/candidates2005/manifesto/manf3.htm
The BNP will send home only all of the following ;
A) All illegal immigrants and their dependents
B) All bogus asylum seekers and their dependents
C) All those immigrants convicted of criminal offences in the UK and their dependents.
D) All those that were convicted of crimes in their own countries prior to coming to the UK and their dependents
E) All those involved in terrorism or supporting terrorism such as funding terrorist groups
F) All those that did not claim asylum in the first European nation they could have claimed asylum in according to international asylum rules as defined in the Schengen and Dublin treaties . We will follow international law and only accept asylum seekers who are French, German, Dutch etc.
http://www.zmk.uni-freiburg.de/EuropeanSocialStructure/SeminarvorlesungSS99/CarlLevy/Textversion/textversion.htm
F) All migrant workers not in employment
G) All migrant workers who are working illegally
H) All those immigrants who activities are a threat to British National Security and British society.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/11/05/europe/EU-GEN-EU-Italy-Immigrants.php
This right to do so has been confirmed by the European Commission ;
Italy's government has acted within its rights when it passed an emergency decree last week authorizing expulsions of European Union citizens deemed dangerous to public safety, the European Commission said Tuesday.
But the EU executive stressed that the measure — a response to a wave of violent crimes perpetrated by foreigners — may only be used against individuals, not ethnic groups or nationals of any particular country.
The bloc said that even though all EU citizens generally have the right to move freely within the 27 member nations and reside where they wish, they must still fulfill a number of conditions, including proof of sufficient income and health insurance so that they are not a burden on the host state.
The conditions vary depending on the country. Requirements are tougher on citizens of 10 of the 12 new member states that have joined the EU since 2004.
"It is possible to expel citizens of another state if they don't fulfill the (residency) criteria or represent a threat to public safety or public health," EU Justice and Home Affairs spokesman Friso Roscam Abbing.
I)All those refused asylum and still resident in the country
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 ) Lie number 10 ; The BNP is a racist party ;
Racism is defined as ' Prejudice plus power equals racism ' or ' prejudice or discrimination based on race, plus the power to enforce it '.
http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/activities/activity4.html
On this definition of racism the BNP cannot ever be accused of being racist, and nor can it ever accused of racism, as the BNP have ;
a) Never been in political power in Britain to pass any racist laws
b) Never actually passed any laws that are racist ( the application of power)
c) Never victimised someone on the basis of their race ( as we have never passed any laws that discriminate on the grounds of race )
The ONLY political parties that can be accused of racism are the parties that have been in power, as they have passed racist laws that have impacted not just upon the immigrants but also indigenous whites.
For example the Race Relations Act 1976 sections 37 and 38 allows POSITIVE ACTION plans to be set up in companies that discirminate against white and English people on the basis of their race and ethnicity. This is state sanctioned racism that is designed to discriminate against indigenous Britons for the benefit of immigrants.
This is racism in its purest form.
http://www.agcas.org.uk/about_us/what_are_agcas_policies/eopol/eopol7.htm
The most racist party in Britain is the Labour Party - read what the Labour Party did to the Diego Garcians here ;
http://www.minesandcommunities.org/Aboutus/londoncall44.htm
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/sep2003/dieg-s15.shtml
Not only did the Labour government steal the land, the homes and the hopes of the Diego Garcian peoples - the Labour Party then left them in total destitution in the UK with no benefits or right to housing.
This was one of the most disgusting cases of racism this country has ever seen - and it was one undertaken by the Labour Party and endorsed by the Tory Party.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7075361.stm
Exiles from Diego Garcia are not entitled to jobs and housing benefits in the UK, appeal judges have said.
Three councils in the Gatwick area refused benefits to the families when they arrived in 2004, on grounds they were not habitually resident in the UK.
They took the move under a rule made to stop benefits tourism. Families claimed discrimination at the appeal court, but three judges ruled against them.
The UK expelled the Diego Garcians from the Indian Ocean island in the 1970s.
Residents of the island in the Chagos archipelago were moved to Mauritius in 1971, when Britain leased the island to the US to use as a military base.
The next time you are told something about the BNP - then realise that unless you are speaking to us in the BNP or a member of the BNP or are reading something produced by the BNP, then the person you are speaking too is probably either ignorant, a liar or has been brainwashed by the media to believe lies about the BNP.
If you want the facts, ask us.
If you want to remain ignorant about the BNP - then only believe what you are told by those who have a motive to make sure you remain ignorant.
From 1900 - 2007 The Crisis Begins
The number of indictable offences per thousand population in 1900 was 2.4 and in 1997 the figure was 89.1.
In 2004, 1.8 million offenders were found guilty or cautioned, four per cent more than in 2003.
The British Crime Survey estimates unreported crime; in 1997 56% of crimes were not reported to the police. In earlier years, this figure was probably higher and accounts for some of the increase.
Reported crime peaked in 1992 when 109.4 indictable offences were recorded per thousand population.
An analysis of Home Office figures for 2006 reveals that only 9.7 per cent of all 'serious woundings', including stabbings, that are reported to the police result in a conviction. For robberies the figure falls to 8.9 per cent and for rape, it is 5.5 per cent.
Serious woundings have risen by more than half in 10 years to almost 20,000 attacks each year, but their conviction rate has fallen from 14.8 to 9.7 per cent. Nearly 13,000 rapes were recorded by police in the year from April 2004, double the total for 1997, and over the period the conviction rate collapsed from 9.2 to 5.5 per cent. There was, however, a fall in the number of burglaries and the conviction rate for them rose - but only by 0.5 per cent.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1784623,00.html
A rising trend in reported crime began in 1954, when the figure was 9.7 per 1000.
Since 1992 (to 1997), the rising trend in reported crime has been reversed, primarily due to changes in the way the police record crimes and also because fewer people bother reporting crimes to the police anymore.
Before 1992, the reported crime rate did not fall significantly at any time.
The rate of homicides peaked in the mid-1990s. In 1995 14.5 homicides were committed per million of population.
Since the early 1960s the number of homicides per million population has more than doubled.
In 1901 the average prison population was 15,900.
By 1998 the figure had increased to 65,300. There were more prisoners in 1998 than in any other year this century.
In 2007 the number of prisoners in England and Wales hit an all-time high of 80,846 yesterday, raising fears that the court service could run out of cell space this week if too few remand prisoners succeed in getting bail. The record numbers saw 450 prisoners housed in police and court cells made available for overspill.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/prisons/story/0,,2090955,00.html
From 1901 to 1916 the trend was downwards. The prison population was at its lowest level in the inter-war years at about 10-11,000.
In the 1940s the population began to rise: between 1946 and 1986 the average male prison population increased by about 800 per annum. 14 Decreases occurred between 1951-56 and 1986- 91, though the numbers of prisoners was on the rise overall.
The latter reduction in the prison population was due to policy intervention between 1989 and 1992. The population decreased from 46,800 (in 1986) to 44,800 (in 1991). But the reduction was short-lived: by 1996 the population was 55,300.15
The 20th century began with net emigration, mostly of young British men, to other countries, especially North America, Australia, New Zealand and the other colonies. During the Great Depression this was reversed as migrants returned home, and following the Second World War there was marked immigration from Commonwealth countries. As a result, there was net inward migration from 1931 through to 1961. In the 1970s and 1980s, the UK became a net exporter of people as families migrated to Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. ASt the same time as mass immigration began to impact ujpon the UK.
Note the EXACT correllation between crime rising and the increase in the numbers of of migrants entering the UK.
It was reported in 1982 that black people made up 18% of the prison population, but only accounted for 5% of the general population. The figures are worse for Afro-Caribbean males, 1% of the population, but 11% of the prison population. (Home Office 1982).
A survey by the PSI (Policy Studies Institute) in 1983 found that blacks were disproportionately arrested, they found that 5% of the population of London were black, but 17% of those arrested in London were black. Further studies by Walker (1988) & (1989) support these findings.
On 30th June 1994, there were 8,100 prisoners emanating from an ethnic minority in jail, compared with 6,700 on the same date in 1993. 16% of all male prisoners were black compared with 25% of females. On the same date 800 of the above were foreign nationals, a significant proportion of whom were not normally resident in the UK. The difference in the male and female figures is almost entirely accounted for by foreign nationals. Of British national males in prison, 12% emanated from an. ethnicminority, compared to just 5 % in the general population. However,African or African-Caribbean males made up 9% of the population,compared to their representation of 1% in the general population.
New Home Office statistics show numbers of African-Caribbean prisoners has leapt a staggering 58% since 1997, with young black men making up over 90% of all black inmates.
http://www.blink.org.uk/pdescription.asp?key=2982&grp=16
Penal experts expressed shock over the dramatic rise in the numbers of black prisoners, which has far outstripped the numbers of African-Caribbean’s going to university. For every African Caribbean man in university there are now two in jail.
The last six years have seen the steepest-ever climb in the numbers and proportion of black prisoners. Today there are now three times as many African-Caribbeans behind bars than there were in 1985 when Douglas Hurd was Home Secretary.
Black men are nine times more likely to be locked up compared to white men in the UK.
African-Caribbean’s made up 8% of the total prison population in 1985, but that figure had risen to 12% when Labour won power in 1997. It is now 17%.
The CRE recently published part two of its’ formal investigation into the prison service following the death of Zahid Mubarak, 19, at the hands of a racist cellmate in 1999.
The report, called ‘Race Equality in Prisons’, found that for every 100,000 white people in Britain, 188 were in jail. But for black people the figure was 1,704. That means black people are over nine times more likely to be in prison than their white counterparts.
A CRE spokeswoman said: "Imprisonment is becoming a defining experience for some ethnic minority groups. In 2002, there were more African Caribbean entrants to prisons in England and Wales than there were to UK universities. And for every African Caribbean male on campus, there were two black Britons in jail.
Black people of all ages are three times more likely to be arrested than white people.
Black people constitute 2.7 percent of the population aged 10-17, but represent 8.5 percent of all those arrested in England and Wales. Black people are just over six times more likely to be stopped and searched by the police than white people.
From 1997 to 2003 there was an overall increase of just under 9 percent in all British male prisoners.
However, black male prisoners with British nationality increased by 21.5 percent over this period of time, compared to a 5 percent rise in number of white male prisoners with British nationality.
(Source: House of Commons home affairs committee report into Young Black People and the Criminal Justice System. To download a copy, go to » www.tinyurl.com/2ekd5s)
As of the end of June 2007, some 10,097 foreign nationals were in British jails, representing about 14% of the prison population.
Taken together they form approximately a third of the total. Jamaicans comprise 13% of all foreign national prisoners. Some 19 nationalities have only one prisoner each in British jails.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4946988.stm
The Prison Service has converted two jails to hold only foreign national prisoners, it has been revealed.
Bullwood Hall, Essex, and Canterbury Prison, Kent, have been taking foreign offenders since the 2006 crisis over prisoners who had not been deported.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7059283.stm
Between 1999 and 2006, the Home Office released some 1,000 foreign nationals from prison convicted of serious crimes. These were people who normally should have been considered for deportation.
More than 870 had been serving at least 12 months, and 13 were serving more than 10 years.
The 1,023 prisoners had been convicted of a wide range of offences, the largest single groups being drugs offences, forgery, robbery, deception and violence.
Foreign prisoners now make up almost one in six of Britain's jail population and are costing the taxpayer almost £400 million a year to keep, new figures show.
The explosion in the number of overseas inmates has been the main driver behind the overcrowding crisis that has pushed the total above 80,000.
Figures published by the Home Office in a parliamentary written answer show there are now 12,122 foreign prisoners compared to around 10,000 just a year ago.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/03/njail03.xml
Over the past five years, while the number of British prisoners has gone up by about 10 per cent, there has been an 80 per cent increase in foreigners, taking up 4,000 more prison places than anticipated.
The Government's latest figures show that the annual cost per prisoner place was £32,888 in 2005-06. Mr Green said this meant the annual cost of keeping 12,000 foreign inmates amounts to £398,339,456.
Research by the National Association of Probation Officers (Napo) suggests that more than 1,200 foreign nationals have passed their release date but are still being held while officials struggle to process their deportation papers. Around 700 of these are in prison, with the remainder in immigration removal centres. It costs around £40,000 a year to keep someone in prison, suggesting that the situation is costing the government almost £4m a month.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/politics/story/0,,1859380,00.html
There are nearly 10,000 foreign nationals in Britain's jails, 13 per cent of the prison population. Immigration court sources suggest only 30 per cent of those subjected to deportation proceedings are currently returned to their country of origin. Napo estimates the backlog will not be cleared until the autumn and warns that prison and probation staff are struggling to cope with a problem that has seen hundreds of staff transferred from processing asylum applications to sorting out the foreign prisoner crisis.
A recent UK Home Office [official website] report [text part 1, part 2, PDF] prepared for Prime Minister Tony Blair [JURIST news archive] details the country's first increase in crime since the mid-1990s and predicts a massive 25% increase in its prison population over the next five years, according to the Sunday Times.
The report also observes a growing gap between Britain's poorest and wealthiest residents and details a lack of cohesion among ethnic groups contributing to an upward crime trend. It makes suggestions for reducing crime including heroin vaccinations, a ban on alcohol advertising, chemical castration, ID chip implants, public shaming, parenting classes, and the use of bounty hunters. To increase cohesion in society, the report suggests a ban on face-obscuring veils [JURIST news archive] in schools.
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/12/uk-crime-rate-rise-detailed-prison.php
The content of the leaked memo is embarrassing for Blair's Labour Party [party website], which claims to be tough on crime. It predicts "there is still little chance that a crime will be detected and result in a caution or conviction" and states that nine out of ten crimes were either not responded to or went unpunished.
The most recent analysis shows that in 2004, 87,000 people from black or minority ethnic communities (BME) said they had been a victim of a racially motivated crime. In the same period, 92,000 white people said they had also fallen victim.
Focusing on violent racial attacks, 49,000 BME were victims. Among whites, the number was 77,000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6128466.stm
Most of the offenders (57%) in the racially motivated crimes identified in the British Crime Survey are not white. White victims said 82% of offenders were not white.
Among black victims of race crime, a quarter of offenders were identified as not white. Among Asian victims, the non-white proportion rises to a third.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1928559,00.html
Nearly half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white, according to official figures released by the Home Office.
The data, released under Freedom of Information legislation, shows that between 1995 and 2004 there have been 58 murders where the police consider a racial element played a key part. Out of these, 24 have been where the murder victim was white.
The disclosure will add to the intense debate over multiculturalism in British society. The figures also overturn the assumption that almost all racial murders are committed against ethnic minority victims.
Senior police officers have admitted that 'political correctness' and the fear of discussing the issue have meant that race crime against white people goes under-reported. One chief constable has claimed that white, working-class men are more alienated than the Muslim community.
Peter Fahy, the Chief Constable of Cheshire and a spokesman on race issues for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said it was a fact that it was harder to get the media interested where murder victims were young white men.
'The political correctness and reluctance to discuss these things absolutely does play a factor', he said. 'A lot of police officers and other professions feel almost the best thing to do is try and avoid it for fear of being criticised. We probably have all got ourselves into a bit of state about this.
'The difficulty in the police service is that the whole thing is being closed down because we are all afraid of discussing any of it in case we say the wrong thing - and that is not healthy.'
Overall, there have been 10 black victims and 16 Asian victims. Of the 58 race murders, 18 have been where a white attacker has killed a black or Asian individual and another 14 where one member of a minority group has murdered another for racial reasons.
In 1999 the Commission for Racial Equality published a report that concluded that most racial crimes were committed against white people.
In 2004, 1.8 million offenders were found guilty or cautioned, four per cent more than in 2003.
The British Crime Survey estimates unreported crime; in 1997 56% of crimes were not reported to the police. In earlier years, this figure was probably higher and accounts for some of the increase.
Reported crime peaked in 1992 when 109.4 indictable offences were recorded per thousand population.
An analysis of Home Office figures for 2006 reveals that only 9.7 per cent of all 'serious woundings', including stabbings, that are reported to the police result in a conviction. For robberies the figure falls to 8.9 per cent and for rape, it is 5.5 per cent.
Serious woundings have risen by more than half in 10 years to almost 20,000 attacks each year, but their conviction rate has fallen from 14.8 to 9.7 per cent. Nearly 13,000 rapes were recorded by police in the year from April 2004, double the total for 1997, and over the period the conviction rate collapsed from 9.2 to 5.5 per cent. There was, however, a fall in the number of burglaries and the conviction rate for them rose - but only by 0.5 per cent.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1784623,00.html
A rising trend in reported crime began in 1954, when the figure was 9.7 per 1000.
Since 1992 (to 1997), the rising trend in reported crime has been reversed, primarily due to changes in the way the police record crimes and also because fewer people bother reporting crimes to the police anymore.
Before 1992, the reported crime rate did not fall significantly at any time.
The rate of homicides peaked in the mid-1990s. In 1995 14.5 homicides were committed per million of population.
Since the early 1960s the number of homicides per million population has more than doubled.
In 1901 the average prison population was 15,900.
By 1998 the figure had increased to 65,300. There were more prisoners in 1998 than in any other year this century.
In 2007 the number of prisoners in England and Wales hit an all-time high of 80,846 yesterday, raising fears that the court service could run out of cell space this week if too few remand prisoners succeed in getting bail. The record numbers saw 450 prisoners housed in police and court cells made available for overspill.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/prisons/story/0,,2090955,00.html
From 1901 to 1916 the trend was downwards. The prison population was at its lowest level in the inter-war years at about 10-11,000.
In the 1940s the population began to rise: between 1946 and 1986 the average male prison population increased by about 800 per annum. 14 Decreases occurred between 1951-56 and 1986- 91, though the numbers of prisoners was on the rise overall.
The latter reduction in the prison population was due to policy intervention between 1989 and 1992. The population decreased from 46,800 (in 1986) to 44,800 (in 1991). But the reduction was short-lived: by 1996 the population was 55,300.15
The 20th century began with net emigration, mostly of young British men, to other countries, especially North America, Australia, New Zealand and the other colonies. During the Great Depression this was reversed as migrants returned home, and following the Second World War there was marked immigration from Commonwealth countries. As a result, there was net inward migration from 1931 through to 1961. In the 1970s and 1980s, the UK became a net exporter of people as families migrated to Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. ASt the same time as mass immigration began to impact ujpon the UK.
Note the EXACT correllation between crime rising and the increase in the numbers of of migrants entering the UK.
It was reported in 1982 that black people made up 18% of the prison population, but only accounted for 5% of the general population. The figures are worse for Afro-Caribbean males, 1% of the population, but 11% of the prison population. (Home Office 1982).
A survey by the PSI (Policy Studies Institute) in 1983 found that blacks were disproportionately arrested, they found that 5% of the population of London were black, but 17% of those arrested in London were black. Further studies by Walker (1988) & (1989) support these findings.
On 30th June 1994, there were 8,100 prisoners emanating from an ethnic minority in jail, compared with 6,700 on the same date in 1993. 16% of all male prisoners were black compared with 25% of females. On the same date 800 of the above were foreign nationals, a significant proportion of whom were not normally resident in the UK. The difference in the male and female figures is almost entirely accounted for by foreign nationals. Of British national males in prison, 12% emanated from an. ethnicminority, compared to just 5 % in the general population. However,African or African-Caribbean males made up 9% of the population,compared to their representation of 1% in the general population.
New Home Office statistics show numbers of African-Caribbean prisoners has leapt a staggering 58% since 1997, with young black men making up over 90% of all black inmates.
http://www.blink.org.uk/pdescription.asp?key=2982&grp=16
Penal experts expressed shock over the dramatic rise in the numbers of black prisoners, which has far outstripped the numbers of African-Caribbean’s going to university. For every African Caribbean man in university there are now two in jail.
The last six years have seen the steepest-ever climb in the numbers and proportion of black prisoners. Today there are now three times as many African-Caribbeans behind bars than there were in 1985 when Douglas Hurd was Home Secretary.
Black men are nine times more likely to be locked up compared to white men in the UK.
African-Caribbean’s made up 8% of the total prison population in 1985, but that figure had risen to 12% when Labour won power in 1997. It is now 17%.
The CRE recently published part two of its’ formal investigation into the prison service following the death of Zahid Mubarak, 19, at the hands of a racist cellmate in 1999.
The report, called ‘Race Equality in Prisons’, found that for every 100,000 white people in Britain, 188 were in jail. But for black people the figure was 1,704. That means black people are over nine times more likely to be in prison than their white counterparts.
A CRE spokeswoman said: "Imprisonment is becoming a defining experience for some ethnic minority groups. In 2002, there were more African Caribbean entrants to prisons in England and Wales than there were to UK universities. And for every African Caribbean male on campus, there were two black Britons in jail.
Black people of all ages are three times more likely to be arrested than white people.
Black people constitute 2.7 percent of the population aged 10-17, but represent 8.5 percent of all those arrested in England and Wales. Black people are just over six times more likely to be stopped and searched by the police than white people.
From 1997 to 2003 there was an overall increase of just under 9 percent in all British male prisoners.
However, black male prisoners with British nationality increased by 21.5 percent over this period of time, compared to a 5 percent rise in number of white male prisoners with British nationality.
(Source: House of Commons home affairs committee report into Young Black People and the Criminal Justice System. To download a copy, go to » www.tinyurl.com/2ekd5s)
As of the end of June 2007, some 10,097 foreign nationals were in British jails, representing about 14% of the prison population.
Taken together they form approximately a third of the total. Jamaicans comprise 13% of all foreign national prisoners. Some 19 nationalities have only one prisoner each in British jails.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4946988.stm
The Prison Service has converted two jails to hold only foreign national prisoners, it has been revealed.
Bullwood Hall, Essex, and Canterbury Prison, Kent, have been taking foreign offenders since the 2006 crisis over prisoners who had not been deported.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7059283.stm
Between 1999 and 2006, the Home Office released some 1,000 foreign nationals from prison convicted of serious crimes. These were people who normally should have been considered for deportation.
More than 870 had been serving at least 12 months, and 13 were serving more than 10 years.
The 1,023 prisoners had been convicted of a wide range of offences, the largest single groups being drugs offences, forgery, robbery, deception and violence.
Foreign prisoners now make up almost one in six of Britain's jail population and are costing the taxpayer almost £400 million a year to keep, new figures show.
The explosion in the number of overseas inmates has been the main driver behind the overcrowding crisis that has pushed the total above 80,000.
Figures published by the Home Office in a parliamentary written answer show there are now 12,122 foreign prisoners compared to around 10,000 just a year ago.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/03/njail03.xml
Over the past five years, while the number of British prisoners has gone up by about 10 per cent, there has been an 80 per cent increase in foreigners, taking up 4,000 more prison places than anticipated.
The Government's latest figures show that the annual cost per prisoner place was £32,888 in 2005-06. Mr Green said this meant the annual cost of keeping 12,000 foreign inmates amounts to £398,339,456.
Research by the National Association of Probation Officers (Napo) suggests that more than 1,200 foreign nationals have passed their release date but are still being held while officials struggle to process their deportation papers. Around 700 of these are in prison, with the remainder in immigration removal centres. It costs around £40,000 a year to keep someone in prison, suggesting that the situation is costing the government almost £4m a month.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/politics/story/0,,1859380,00.html
There are nearly 10,000 foreign nationals in Britain's jails, 13 per cent of the prison population. Immigration court sources suggest only 30 per cent of those subjected to deportation proceedings are currently returned to their country of origin. Napo estimates the backlog will not be cleared until the autumn and warns that prison and probation staff are struggling to cope with a problem that has seen hundreds of staff transferred from processing asylum applications to sorting out the foreign prisoner crisis.
A recent UK Home Office [official website] report [text part 1, part 2, PDF] prepared for Prime Minister Tony Blair [JURIST news archive] details the country's first increase in crime since the mid-1990s and predicts a massive 25% increase in its prison population over the next five years, according to the Sunday Times.
The report also observes a growing gap between Britain's poorest and wealthiest residents and details a lack of cohesion among ethnic groups contributing to an upward crime trend. It makes suggestions for reducing crime including heroin vaccinations, a ban on alcohol advertising, chemical castration, ID chip implants, public shaming, parenting classes, and the use of bounty hunters. To increase cohesion in society, the report suggests a ban on face-obscuring veils [JURIST news archive] in schools.
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/12/uk-crime-rate-rise-detailed-prison.php
The content of the leaked memo is embarrassing for Blair's Labour Party [party website], which claims to be tough on crime. It predicts "there is still little chance that a crime will be detected and result in a caution or conviction" and states that nine out of ten crimes were either not responded to or went unpunished.
The most recent analysis shows that in 2004, 87,000 people from black or minority ethnic communities (BME) said they had been a victim of a racially motivated crime. In the same period, 92,000 white people said they had also fallen victim.
Focusing on violent racial attacks, 49,000 BME were victims. Among whites, the number was 77,000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6128466.stm
Most of the offenders (57%) in the racially motivated crimes identified in the British Crime Survey are not white. White victims said 82% of offenders were not white.
Among black victims of race crime, a quarter of offenders were identified as not white. Among Asian victims, the non-white proportion rises to a third.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1928559,00.html
Nearly half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white, according to official figures released by the Home Office.
The data, released under Freedom of Information legislation, shows that between 1995 and 2004 there have been 58 murders where the police consider a racial element played a key part. Out of these, 24 have been where the murder victim was white.
The disclosure will add to the intense debate over multiculturalism in British society. The figures also overturn the assumption that almost all racial murders are committed against ethnic minority victims.
Senior police officers have admitted that 'political correctness' and the fear of discussing the issue have meant that race crime against white people goes under-reported. One chief constable has claimed that white, working-class men are more alienated than the Muslim community.
Peter Fahy, the Chief Constable of Cheshire and a spokesman on race issues for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said it was a fact that it was harder to get the media interested where murder victims were young white men.
'The political correctness and reluctance to discuss these things absolutely does play a factor', he said. 'A lot of police officers and other professions feel almost the best thing to do is try and avoid it for fear of being criticised. We probably have all got ourselves into a bit of state about this.
'The difficulty in the police service is that the whole thing is being closed down because we are all afraid of discussing any of it in case we say the wrong thing - and that is not healthy.'
Overall, there have been 10 black victims and 16 Asian victims. Of the 58 race murders, 18 have been where a white attacker has killed a black or Asian individual and another 14 where one member of a minority group has murdered another for racial reasons.
In 1999 the Commission for Racial Equality published a report that concluded that most racial crimes were committed against white people.
Migrants causing mass murder in London
It is the mantra that the multi-culturalists like to spit out at the public the most, that diversity and immigration enrich Britain.
Even though the fact that immigration and diversity is NEVER good for nations and indigenous populations, as proven by research throughout history - link here ;
http://www.geocities.com/integral_tradition/society.html
the fact is that the big lies the media like to tell always overcomes the hidden truth.
Well it appears that both immigration and multi-culturalism are enriching some people, specifically the owners of funeral homes and grave diggers, as a wave of murders linked to immigration is underway in London. Note that the article from the Times below does NOT include black on black gun crimes and black on black child cases. Note also that 23 of the victims of murder may also have been murdered by foreigners as the identity of the killers has not yet been confirmed.
Cressida Dick, the Metropolitan Police's Deputy Assistant Commissioner- told MPs in February 2007 that black gangs in London were copying Jamaican Yardie tactics.
She said that in London 85 per cent of gun murder suspects were black and so were 75 per cent of victims.
Even Tony Blair, in a rare moment of honesty, stated that gun crime was a problem of the black community and black culture.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2055148,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6363713.stm
This problem is also mirrored in America. A study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that from 2001 to 2005, more than nine out of 10 black murder victims were killed by other blacks, and three out of four were slain with a gun. Blacks, who make up 13 percent of the population, were victims in 15 percent of nonfatal violent crimes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/09/AR2007080901964.html
Most murders in London this year were committed by foreigners, according to Scotland Yard figures obtained by The Times.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2980432.ece
Of 47 killings between April and September where the nationality of the accused is known, 26 of the suspects — 55 per cent — are not Britons. In 19 cases the killer is believed to be British. In a further 23 cases the nationality of the killer has not been determined. At least 23 of the victims were foreign, including Somali, Brazilian, Irish and Vietnamese citizens.
Increasingly, police have to travel overseas to trace suspects, liaise with foreign forces and speak to the families of people killed in Britain. The result is that murder cases are becoming more complicated for investigators, more expensive for police forces and more time-consuming for the courts.
Hertfordshire police have had to investigate a murder linked to an Albanian clan feud, and in Cambridgeshire a Lithuanian man was burnt alive. The case was suspected to involve rivalries originating in his homeland. Polish citizens have been killed this year in Leeds, London, St Helens and Wrexham. An Albanian man was convicted over the shooting of a countryman in an Albanian social club in London, and two men were jailed in Tirana for a murder in North London. Four weeks ago Benjamin Marshall was jailed after pleading guilty to the murder of a Lithuanian citizen, Arturas Venckus, in Nottinghamshire.
There is evidence in police budgets of the increased workload of dealing with crimes committed by foreigners. Chief constables are having to pay more for the services of interpreters and translators. With spending at £9.7 million, Scotland Yard is £1 million over budget for interpreters.
The figures from Scotland Yard cannot be presented with scientific certainty as proof of a definite trend. They exclude killings being investigated by the Metropolitan Police’s Child Abuse Investigation Command and by the Operation Trident team which handles gun crime in the black community. "
Yet again the Times has to wheedle out of confronting the truth with by saying it is not evidence of a trend - well that is true, precisely because the government, police and media do not want to discover it is part of a trend.
In fact if the truth ever did reveal it was trend, which we all know it is, then that trend would be hidden by calling anyone who spoke about the trend a 'racist'.
So whilst our people die, the multi-culturalists put all our lives at risk and play the poisonous 'race game' and call anyone who dares confront the crisis of the migrant murder wave in our country as a racist bigot.
Perhaps it is time Trveor Phillips, the premier parasite of the race relations industry, was forced to attend the funerals of the victims of multi-culturalism instead of crying fake crocodile tears about the phantoms of 'racism' that allegedly afflict our society.
Even though the fact that immigration and diversity is NEVER good for nations and indigenous populations, as proven by research throughout history - link here ;
http://www.geocities.com/integral_tradition/society.html
the fact is that the big lies the media like to tell always overcomes the hidden truth.
Well it appears that both immigration and multi-culturalism are enriching some people, specifically the owners of funeral homes and grave diggers, as a wave of murders linked to immigration is underway in London. Note that the article from the Times below does NOT include black on black gun crimes and black on black child cases. Note also that 23 of the victims of murder may also have been murdered by foreigners as the identity of the killers has not yet been confirmed.
Cressida Dick, the Metropolitan Police's Deputy Assistant Commissioner- told MPs in February 2007 that black gangs in London were copying Jamaican Yardie tactics.
She said that in London 85 per cent of gun murder suspects were black and so were 75 per cent of victims.
Even Tony Blair, in a rare moment of honesty, stated that gun crime was a problem of the black community and black culture.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2055148,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6363713.stm
This problem is also mirrored in America. A study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that from 2001 to 2005, more than nine out of 10 black murder victims were killed by other blacks, and three out of four were slain with a gun. Blacks, who make up 13 percent of the population, were victims in 15 percent of nonfatal violent crimes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/09/AR2007080901964.html
Most murders in London this year were committed by foreigners, according to Scotland Yard figures obtained by The Times.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2980432.ece
Of 47 killings between April and September where the nationality of the accused is known, 26 of the suspects — 55 per cent — are not Britons. In 19 cases the killer is believed to be British. In a further 23 cases the nationality of the killer has not been determined. At least 23 of the victims were foreign, including Somali, Brazilian, Irish and Vietnamese citizens.
Increasingly, police have to travel overseas to trace suspects, liaise with foreign forces and speak to the families of people killed in Britain. The result is that murder cases are becoming more complicated for investigators, more expensive for police forces and more time-consuming for the courts.
Hertfordshire police have had to investigate a murder linked to an Albanian clan feud, and in Cambridgeshire a Lithuanian man was burnt alive. The case was suspected to involve rivalries originating in his homeland. Polish citizens have been killed this year in Leeds, London, St Helens and Wrexham. An Albanian man was convicted over the shooting of a countryman in an Albanian social club in London, and two men were jailed in Tirana for a murder in North London. Four weeks ago Benjamin Marshall was jailed after pleading guilty to the murder of a Lithuanian citizen, Arturas Venckus, in Nottinghamshire.
There is evidence in police budgets of the increased workload of dealing with crimes committed by foreigners. Chief constables are having to pay more for the services of interpreters and translators. With spending at £9.7 million, Scotland Yard is £1 million over budget for interpreters.
The figures from Scotland Yard cannot be presented with scientific certainty as proof of a definite trend. They exclude killings being investigated by the Metropolitan Police’s Child Abuse Investigation Command and by the Operation Trident team which handles gun crime in the black community. "
Yet again the Times has to wheedle out of confronting the truth with by saying it is not evidence of a trend - well that is true, precisely because the government, police and media do not want to discover it is part of a trend.
In fact if the truth ever did reveal it was trend, which we all know it is, then that trend would be hidden by calling anyone who spoke about the trend a 'racist'.
So whilst our people die, the multi-culturalists put all our lives at risk and play the poisonous 'race game' and call anyone who dares confront the crisis of the migrant murder wave in our country as a racist bigot.
Perhaps it is time Trveor Phillips, the premier parasite of the race relations industry, was forced to attend the funerals of the victims of multi-culturalism instead of crying fake crocodile tears about the phantoms of 'racism' that allegedly afflict our society.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
