Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

EDL Rally for Israel

Well done to the EDL for their latest rally supporting Israel in London at the weekend.

For far too long the anti-semites in Nationalism have attacked Israel as a way of attacking Jews.

The simple fact is that Israel is not the enemy of British Nationalism.

Israel is a country.

The enemies of British Nationalism are those Zionists, of all races and religions, who put the interests of their racist, imperialist, fascist ideology before the interests of Israel, Britain and the British people.

The problem is that many Nationalists are either too thick or too brainwashed with anti-semitism to understand that being a Zionist does not equate to being either Jewish or with Israel.

The most dangerous and psychotic zionists in the world are not Israeli's they are Americans - and they are mainly the born again Christian fundamentalist lunatics who dominate the Republican Party.

Both George Bush and Tony Blair are Zionists and they started the wars we are fighting.

Zionism is not just a political project for Jewish lunatics, it is a fundamentalist Christian, left wing and right wing political project for lunatics all across the world for many reasons - and who are primarily not even Jewish.

Israel is a nation state and as nationalists we support the right of all peoples on the planet to national self determination - from Israel, to Palestine to Iran.

What we do not support are insane Zionists and Islamists that think they have the right to rule the world or the Middle East for the benefit of their own warped and perverted ideologies.

We as British Nationalists should support all Israeli Nationalists and resist all Zionists and Islamists.

I am sure that in the EDL there are some who do not understand the difference between Zionism and Israeli Nationalism, but then again there are far more in the nationalist movement who also do not understand the difference as well.

Our aim is to educate people that supporting Zionism is to undermine the very basis of Israel and Israeli Nationalism, as Zionism is not a nationalist ideology - it is an imperialist, expansionist and racist political ideology more akin to Nazism than Nationalism.

Zionists, Islamists and Nazis are all variants of anti-nationalist, racist and globalist ideologies.

The irony being of course that the Zionists, being Nazis politically and active Nazi collaborators during the Second World War, have far more in common with the Nazis on sites like Stormfront than they have with any nationalists.

The Zionists and Nazis are mirror images of each other.

Israeli Nationalists are those who want to see an Israel that integrates all its citizens, that fights Islamist and Zionist extremism, that stays within its own borders and takes care of all its people.

Thats why we must support Israel and Israeli Nationalists and resist both Zionism and Islamism.




































Add to Technorati Favorites

Wednesday, 12 August 2009

Israelism, Zionism, 911 and Pavlovs Dogs

The only people as self serving as the Pro-Israelist media are the anti-Israelists that blame everything on Israel.

Take for instance Afghanistan.

Anyone with a brain knows that the reason we are in afghanistan is not to ;

1)Fight terrorism
2)Find Osama Bin Laden
3)Build democracy


We are simply in Afghanistan because the oil and gas the US and UK needs from the Central Asian republics (Eurasia) has to be pumped through Afghanistan and Pakistan in order to avoid the pipelines having to transect Russian or Iranian soil.

Yet the anti-Israel mob still insist on blaming Israel for our being in Afghanistan.

This is simply the biggest load of bollocks I have ever read.

Israel has no strategic interest in Afghanistan. Iran before the invasion of the US regarded Afghanistan as a threat, simply as Iran has the highest number of heroin addicts on the planet and the heroin that supplies the Iranian addicts comes via Afghanistan and because the Taliban and Iran were hostile to each other.

Iran is mainly Shi'ite and the Taliban mostly Sunni ;

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/1998/09/wwwh8915.html

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/meast/9809/15/iran.afghan.tensions.02/index.html

Iran and the Taliban almost went to war in 1998 - it is only after the Taliban were replaced by Karzai that Iranian and Afghan relations began to improve, leading to a new era in economic co-operation.

In fact the US puppet Karazia who runs Afghanistan is seeking closer co-operation with Iran, whilst the Taliban who were regarded as threat to Iran, are being hunted and killed by karzai's army.

If America and Israel really wanted Afghanistan to be hostile to Iran then they should have left the Taliban in power - instead Karzai wants good relations with Iran ;

http://www.parstimes.com/news/archive/2005/rfe/afghanistan_iran_relations.html

" Iran and Afghanistan are also cooperating in the fight against the trafficking of drugs from Afghanistan.

Iran’s strained relations with the United States have not prevented Tehran from strengthening its economic and trade cooperation with Kabul since the U.S.-led fall of the Taliban in late 2001.

Colonel Christopher Langton, who heads the defense analysis department at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, said Iran is an important country in the future reconstruction and development of Afghanistan.

“They are being closely linked by efforts against the Taliban in the past, but also because of the influence that Iran can bring there with the Hazara population [who, like Iranians, are Shi'a Muslims]. And in the development sector, there are already projects which Iran is involved in -- for instance, the road from Bandar Abbas on the Persian Gulf up through Afghanistan to Central Asia is a very, very important project for the future of Afghanistan," Langton said. "There is a whole list of political, economic, and security issues which connect Afghanistan and Iran.”

Iran and Afghanistan are also connected historically and culturally. And Iran’s strained relations with the United States have not prevented Tehran from strengthening its economic and trade cooperation with Kabul since the U.S.-led fall of the Taliban in late 2001. "


The removal of the Taliban and the election of Karzai have drawn Iran and Afghanistan closer, not further apart.

Therefore where is the payoff for Israel if Iran and Afghanistan are now not wasting time, money, weapons and troops fighting each other ?

The same thing happened in relation to Iraq, where the downfall of Saddam Hussein INCREASED Iranian influence and power in Iraq, not decreased it.

Therefore the idea that Israel wanted the US in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to destabilise Iran was either the most stupid plan in history - or the idea that such plans existed is one of the most stupid ideas in history.

No-one, neither the Pro-Israelists in the media, or the anti-Israelists ever stop to think that perhaps they are being played, and that by defining everything in the terms of Israel, that they are doing exactly what someone wants.

The US is divided into two camps ;

1) The Pro-Israel media

2) The Anti-Israel groups

The former is powerful in relation to what we see on TV and read in our papers whilst the latter is powerful in regard to the Internet.

The Military-Industrial Block therefore has an interest, along with both sides of the 'Israelists' as I define them - to define and frame every issue in the context of Israel.

The Israelists know that by defining every issue in relation to Israel it means they consolidate their own people around that issue - the pro-Israel media can then use the issue of Israel to get their people to support the issue on TV and in the papers, whilst the anti-Israel groups can use the issue to consolidate their own groups around the issue.

Yet who really benefits - it is the Military Industrial Block who sits in the middle, keeping its head down whilst both sides wage war with each other over the issue of Israel.

For instance - the media were told that the Iraq war was designed to protect Israel, so therefore the media beat the war drums to ensure the interests of Israel were protected.

At the same time the anti-Israel groups believed that the Iraq war was about Israel, so when they opposed the war they defined their opposition in relation to Israel.

Meanwhile the real motive for the war, OIL, was cut out of the debate (apart from sections of the far left and far right ) - and the media constantly talked about scuds filled with WMD's hitting Israeli cities and the opposition talked about AIPAC and the US using the war to support Israel.

This how the Israelists have been trained like Pavlovs Dogs - whenever anyone rings the 'Israel Bell' then both sides start barking and they make so much noise that the truth gets lost between them.

The pro-Israel mobs pump out propaganda on the TV to bolster the case for war, whilst the anti-Israel mobs pump out propaganda on the internet to bolster their case against the war.

Both sides allow the truth to be hidden as the entire debate is framed in the context of Israel.

Every now and then some 'ex-insider' of the US government or military will pop into public prominence and announce' I was told the war was about Israel' and then both sides jump on the statement that the war was about Israel in order to bolster their case - whilst the real reason for the war remains hidden.

Both sides never think for themselves ' Hey man, what if this dude is simply telling us what he has been told and paid to say, and that it wasnt really about Israel' instead they accept what they say as gospel and then both start jumping up and down about Israel even more !

Its pathetic.

Of course the media wins the public debate as it the most powerful and the war goes ahead with massive public backing as the public have also been conditioned by the media to support Israel or they are 'antisemites', and the war and the issues around the war are forever defined in relation to Israel and NOT OIL.

An example of how Obama has used this conditioning as regards Israel for his own political benefit is how he has employed so many Zionists and Jews in his administration.

He has done this as the pro-Israel camp will see his appointees their natural allies in defence of Israel and not attack them or Obama's policies on the TV and in the media for fear of being seen as 'anti-semitic', whilst the anti-Israel camp will constantly target Obama and his spokesmen because of their race and support for Israel - and thereby also never focus on their real agenda or attack them on the grounds of their policies.

Therefore the entire issue is dominated by the issue Israel - and this allows the truth to be hidden away whilst both sides adopt reflexive positions either for or against Israel.

This is a superb plan - it utilises Jewish ethno-communalism and Zionist influence in the media to obscure and hide the truth (classic neo-conservative and neo-trotskyite methodology - The Noble Lie ) whilst it allows the opponents of everything Obama says and does if they mention Israel or the Jewishness of his staff to be painted as a rabid anti-semites.

To be frank I am sick of both sides.

The pro-Israel media were suckered into supporting the Iraq and Afghanistan war simply because they believed it was in the interests of Israel - when the end result has been to consolidate the Middle East around the issue of religious and tribal loyalty instead of nationalism - and thereby united Shi'ites in Iran and Iraq and at the same time has led to Iran and Afghanistan drawing closer whilst Iran funds Hamas and Hezbollah to checkmate Israel.

The anti-Israel camp by constantly depicting every issue as about Isarel, rather than simple truth such as OIL in Iraq and the OIL and gas pipelines in Afghanistan, have merely ensured that no real opposition to the plots of the Military Industrial Block can develop for people fear being called 'anti-semitic' if they are heard or seen criticising Israel - each side sits in their own pro/anti Israel bunker masturbating over the issue of Israel whilst the Military Industrial Block is free to do as it wants, invading nations, stealing their land and natural resources.

It is time that the Israelists, those whose loyalty is to Israel or those who hatred is directed at Israel, both fucked off.

The Israelists in the media have been played as fools by the Military-Industrial Block and the Israelists in the anti-Israel camp have also been played as fools by the same Military Industrial Block.

Both have allowed the Military Industrial Block to hide their crimes and duplicity even in events such as 911.

The fools in the 'Truther' movement who see the shadowy figure of Israel behind the 911 attacks simply serve the interests of those within the US Military industrial Block who want their role in the 911 attack to be hidden from public view.

Those who talk about 911 as being the responsibility of the US Military-Industrial Block can then be lumped into the anti-semitic 'Truthers' camp and this alienates the majority of normal people whilst allowing the guilty to hide in plain sight.

Instead of debate we have two wild dogs barking at each other - one pro-Israel dog in the media and one anti-Israel dog on the internet.

Meanwhile the Miliatry Industrial Block knows it can do as it wants as the barking dogs are distracting everyones attention away from what they are doing.

The Israelists are more than just fools, they are dangerous as they provide the smoke and mirrors for the real devils to get on with their work in private.

The Israelists merely allow the guilty to hide in plain sight.


I am an Pro-Israel and anti-Zionist.

I am Pro-America and anti-The US Military Industrial Block.

I am Pro-Palestine and anti-Islamist.

I am anti-Islamism not anti-Islam.

I am Pro-the Iranian people and pro-the Iranian nation and anti-Iranian Islamist fundamentalism

I am Pro-Christian and anti-Christian Fundamentalism

I am pro-Fatah and anti-Hamas as Fatah are NATIONALISTS and Hamas are Islamists who want a global caliphate which is antithesis of nationalism.

An anti-semite is not someone who is anti-Zionist as Zionism is a political ideology

Anti-Israelism is not a position that any nationalist can take as Israel is a nation and nationalists support the right of all nations to exist.

Any 'nationalist' that says they are against Israel is an anti-semite using nationalism to hide behind.

Anti-Zionism is not anti-Israelism, this is because Zionism, a political ideology, is where the agents of Right Wing Israeli politics have invaded, usurped and comprimised our political, economic and media systems in the US and UK to serve the interests of the Israeli political right wing instead of serving the interests of our own nations.

We must differentiate between Israelism and the Israelists, both pro-Israel and anti-Israel, in order to concentrate our attention on the US and UK Military Industrial Block and the activities of the political Zionists in our nations ( AIPAC, Board of Deputies of British Jews, Searchlight, Christian Zionist groups, evangelical Christian fundamentalist zionist groups, rightwing conservative and left wing Zionists etc ).

It is the US and UK Military Industrial Blocks, the Zionists in our nations, Christian Zionist fundamentalists, the Taliban, the Iranian mullahs and conservative politicians within Iran, Hamas in Palestine and the Islamists in our nations that are the source of our problems, not America and Americans, Jews, Muslims, Israel, Afghanistan, Iran, Christians, Judaism and Islam.
































Add to Technorati Favorites

Thursday, 5 February 2009

The Racism Of The Cosmopolitans

How often do we see trivial newspaper reports by asinine journalists paid by their bosses to publish an anti-BNP article with the usual smears on the BNP such as 'the racist BNP' or one of the other trivial ad hominem attacks the retards of the media can dribble onto a keyboard.

Its so often it is boring.

The endless propaganda of the 'racist right' as being the primary source of racism in the UK is the staple myth of the leftist liberal idiot.

They cling to their facile beliefs like a drowning man will cling to any hope.

Yet note how the Liberal Left NEVER EVER seek to debate the racism of ;

1) Muslims against Jews and whites

2) The racism of the Left against Jews and Israel and the White Working Class

3) The racism of the liberals against Jews and Israel and the White Working Class

The entire debate on racism in the media revolves solely around white working class British people, as these are the last group in our society who anyone can be racist about and be allowed to be racist in the media, and the BNP.

This is because the idiots in the media are the real racists.

Just because the journalists that peddle the racist myths are predominately white and British does not mean they cannot be racist against the White Working Class British people.

Note the recent reports on the BBC trying to depict the strikers and the BNP as racist, when both the strikers and the BNP have stated that the strikes have nothing to do with racism but simply with discrmination against British workers.

These Cosmopolitans as I call them are the white British middle class who care more about poor Africans, the people of Gaza or the plight of ethnic minorities in the UK than they care about the interests of the White Working Class.

The Cosmopolitans may be born in the UK and they may be white but they do not give a damn about the British white working class, for the Cosmopolitans the white working class are sub-human chav scum to be despised and their mass deaths from alcoholism, drug abuse and obesity to be celebrated as a way to pave the way clear for millions of ethnics and immigrants to enter the country.

The Cosmopoltan has no loyalty to people, nation and culture - they care only about strangers, fashion and shopping in New York or holidaying in Dubai.

For the Cosmopolitan the only racism that matters is the racism of whites, and the racism of Muslims and Jews, the racism of the left and liberals and the racism of all other ethnic groups against whites such as in South Africa are to be either ignored or applauded.

The media never try and debate the internal racism of the Left and Liberals, the internal racism of the White Middle Class and the anti-white working class racism of the media itself.

The internal racism of the Cosmopolitans is the dirty little secret that they seek to hide by constantly attacking the BNP as racists.

The more the media and the Cosmopolitans can define the debate on racism solely by directing it at whites and the political right, the easier it is for them to minimise their own racism and the racism of the liberals and the left.

Every now and then one of the Cosmopolitans like Jonathan Freedland will make a public statement about the racism of the Cosmopolitans - but only to defend one of the favoured racial or religious groups of the Cosmopolitans like Jews, Blacks or Muslims.

Only very rarely will a Cosmopolitan defend the interests of the White Working Class, , though of course this has to be predicated with an attack on the BNP at the same time, even though the BNP are the ONLY political organisation set up to directly represent the interests of the British public in the multi-cultural system.

The Cosmopolitans will usually only ever use the media to direct public attention at the racism of the political right and the white working class, though of course when one section of the racist Cosmopolitans feels threatened by anything they will use the networks amongst the Cosmopolitans to air that issue.

But the day after the debate goes public the media will only be focused once again on the racism of the white working class and the BNP.

Read the article from Freedland here ;



http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/04/gaza-jewish-community

As British Jews come under attack, the liberal left must not remain silent.

It should be perfectly possible to condemn Israel's brutal action in Gaza while taking a stand against antisemitism
Comments (540)
Jonathan Freedland The Guardian, Wednesday 4 February 2009 Article historyIn the immediate aftermath of the attacks on September 11 2001 and July 7 2005, a noble impulse seized the British liberal left. Politicians, commentators and activists united to say to their fellow citizens that, no matter how outraged they felt at the loss of civilian life they had just witnessed, they should under no circumstances take out that anger on the Muslim community. Progressive voices insisted that Muslims were not to be branded as guilty by association, just because the killers of 9/11 and 7/7 had been Muslims and had claimed to act in the name of all Muslims.

They urged Britons to be careful in their language, not to generalise from a few individuals to an entire community, to make clear to Britain's Muslims that they were a welcome part of the national life. One week after the 7/7 London attacks, a vast crowd gathered in Trafalgar Square to hear a call for unity led by then mayor Ken Livingstone, who said Londoners should not start looking for "who to blame and who to hate".

It was the right reaction and I am glad that, writing on these pages, I shared it, denouncing the surge in Islamophobia that greeted either a terrorist attack or the revelation of a terror plot. Yet there's been a curious silence in the last few weeks. Once again many are outraged by the loss of civilian life they have witnessed - this time in Gaza. Yet there has been no chorus of liberal voices insisting that, no matter how intense their fury, people must not take out that anger on Britain's Jewish community.

It's worth stating the obvious - that Operation Cast Lead is not 9/11 or 7/7, that Israel is not al-Qaida - and noting that the silence has not been absolute. In a very welcome move, a group of leading Muslims wrote an open letter condemning apparent Gaza-related attacks on Jews. Meanwhile, Labour's Denis MacShane, in a passionate article for Progress magazine, urged those on the left not "to turn criticism of Israel into a condemnation of Jews".

Otherwise, it has been eerily quiet. Those who in 2001 or 2005 rapidly spoke out against guilt by association have been mute this time. Yet this is no abstract concern. For British Jews have indeed come under attack.

According to the Community Security Trust, the body that monitors anti-Jewish racism, the four weeks after Cast Lead began saw an eightfold increase in antisemitic incidents in Britain compared with the same period a year earlier. It reports 250 incidents - nearly 10 a day - the highest number since it began its work 25 years ago. Among them are attacks on synagogues, including arson, and physical assaults on Jews. One man was set upon in Golders Green, north London, by two men who shouted, "This is for Gaza", as they punched and kicked him to the ground.

Blood-curding graffiti has appeared in Jewish areas across the country, slogans ranging from "Slay the Jewish pigs", and "Kill the Jews", to "Jewish bastardz." Jewish schools have been advised to be on high alert against attack. Most now have security guards on the door; some have a police presence.

The threat is real, and yet barely a word has been heard from those who pride themselves on their vigilance against racism. But there is more than a sin of omission here.

Take last month's demonstrations against Israel. Riazat Butt, the Guardian's religious affairs correspondent, describes in a joint edition of the Guardian's Islamophonic and Sounds Jewish podcasts how at one demo she heard the cry not only of "Down with Israel" but "Kill Jews". An anti-war protest in Amsterdam witnessed chants of: "Hamas, Hamas, Jews to the gas."

At the London events, there were multiple placards deploying what has now become a commonplace image: the Jewish Star of David equated with the swastika. From the podium George Galloway declared: "Today, the Palestinian people in Gaza are the new Warsaw ghetto, and those who are murdering them are the equivalent of those who murdered the Jews in Warsaw in 1943."

Now what, do you imagine, is the effect of repeating, again and again, that Israel is a Nazi state? Even those with the scantest historical knowledge know that the Nazis are the embodiment of evil to which the only appropriate response is hate. How surprising is it if a young man, already appalled by events in Gaza, walks home from a demo and glimpses the Star of David - which he now sees as a latter-day swastika - outside a synagogue and decides to torch the building, or at least desecrate it? Yet Galloway, along with Livingstone, who was so careful in July 2005, did not hesitate to make the comparison (joined by a clutch of Jewish anti-Israel activists who should know better).

The counter-arguments here are predictable. Some will say they take pains to distinguish between Zionists and Jews. Intellectually, that's fine; in the seminar room, it holds water. The trouble is, it doesn't mean much on the street - at least not to the man who saw a group of Manchester Jews leaving synagogue on January 17 and shouted "Free Palestine, you motherfuckers," before giving them the Nazi salute.

The liberal left should know this already. After all, when Jack Straw wrote his notorious piece about the hijab, full of qualifications, progressives understood that none of that would matter: it would be read as an attack on all Muslims. And so it was. For all Straw's careful phrasing, Muslim women whose heads were covered were attacked. Liberals warned Straw that he was playing with fire. Today's anti-Israel activists need to realise they are doing the same.

Besides, this business of distinguishing between good and bad Jews has a long history. Anthony Julius, author of a definitive study of English antisemitism, says that, with the exception of the Nazis, Jew-haters have always made distinctions. Christian antisemites accepted Jews who were ready to convert and rejected those who refused. A century ago, Winston Churchill drew a line between homegrown British Jews and those spreading Bolshevism. Now the dividing line is affinity for Israel.

But the logical corollary of this is that, if Jews refuse to dissociate themselves from Israel, then they are fair game for abuse and attack until they publicly recant. Liberals rightly recoil from the constant pressure on Muslims to explain themselves and denounce jihadism or even islamism. Yet they make the same implicit demand when they suggest Jews are OK, unless they are Zionists. The effect is to make Jews' place in British society contingent on their distance from their fellow Jews, in this case, Israelis.

Nor is it good enough to say that most Jews support Israel. Yes, most have a strong affinity and family ties to the Jewish state. But that doesn't mean they support every policy, including the one that led to such mayhem in Gaza. And do we think that those who kicked the man in Golders Green first stopped to ask his opinion of the merits of Cast Lead?

I know that some will say that even raising this is an attempt to divert attention from the real and larger issue, Israel's brutality in Gaza and the colossal number of civilian deaths that entailed. I won't accept that. Regular readers know that I denounced Cast Lead from the beginning. But I shouldn't have to say that. These two matters are separate. It is perfectly possible to condemn Israel's current conduct and to stand firmly against anti-Jewish prejudice. And it's about time liberals and the left said so.

freedland@guardian.co.uk



















Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday, 10 January 2009

Gaza - Its Your Fault.

The people responsible for the killing of Palestinians in Gaza are ;

1) Israel

2) Iran

3) Hamas

4) The white liberal elite of the West.

This is because the reason why Gaza is being hammered by the Israelis is because the white liberals in the West all ensured that Israel could not direct military action against Iran.

Therefore Israel had to disinfect Gaza, and probably Lebanon next as regards Hizbollah, of Hamas.

The white liberals used their power and influence in the media, politics and internationally to ensure that the US did not give the green light to an attack on Irans nuclear facilities.

Therefore Israel has undertaken the only other option it had left which was to sterilise Gaza of Hamas and remove Iranian influence from its borders.

Once Iran has its nuclear weapons then Israel is checkmated - and the rise in Arab demographics, Russian supplies of missiles and weapons to Iran and assymetric warfare will ensure Israel is under constant attack on its borders.

Once Iran has its nuclear weapons then it will use them to sign accords with other nations with a ' joint response ' deal, where nations such as Lebanon will be used as bases for terrorism and if Israel attacks them then Iran can deploy its conventional forces against Israel.

Israel will not be able to defeat a combined Arab army with modern Russian weapons, and if Israel used its nukes against any arab armies then it woul allow Iran to retaliate in kind - and just one nuclear bomb will destroy Israel whilst 10 nuclear bombs would barely make a dent in the number of Arabs and merely create a few million 'martyrs' whose deaths can be used as justification to destroy Israel in the future.

The whining, hand wringing liberals have no idea of political and military necessities so that nations can survive when faced with existential threats - they believe in such vapid ideals as 'negotiation' and rationalism when faced with forces that regard death as liberation and any form of comprimise as weakness and surrender.

The true enemies of the West are not the forces of Islamism. Islamic terrorism in the West is merely a symptom of the problem, it is not THE problem.

Islamism has taken root in the West because the inner enemy, the white liberals, the Zionist network and the rest of the delusional Dhimmis, have surrendered our nations to them.

A nationalist government could eradicate the Islamist threat in a month with a mixture of emergency trials, capital punishment, internment and deportations.

It is only the fact that we are controlled by traitors and criminals and our nation run by weaklings, fools and delusional cowards that the inner enemies of Islamism and Zionism have managed to take hold in our nation.

The liberals and the rest of the delusional fools that have run our nations for generations have failed in their primary duty - which is to protect our people.

They have allowed the tentacles of Zionism to take control of our media, they have allowed the money power of Islamic oil money to strangle our economic systems, they have allowed Liberalism to infect and poison our schools, universities and create the Servile State and they have allowed capitalism to corrupt and undermine our culture and political systems.

The BBC, and its anti-Israel stance, is anti-Israel because it is the main bastion of liberalism.

The printed press and other media are dominated by the pro-Israel lobby.

The NUJ are dominated by anti-Israel Liberals.

Not one of these institutions stands for Britain, British Nationalism and the British people - they all focus on immigrants, foreign nations and internationalism.

The Zionists that control the media do not care whether Britain becomes an Islamic republic, simply because the Jews in the UK will then be forced to flee to Israel - thereby bolstering the Zionist state itself. France has seen thousands of Jews flee the country and go to Israel because of the same thing. The non-Jewish Zionists, obsessed as they are by theological dogma or simply because they are bought and paid for, also do not care about the interests of British Jews.

For the Jewish Zionists, and the Non-Jewish Zionists, what matters is simply Israel - not Britain, the British people and British Jews.

Having a cabal of Zionists representing patriotic British Jews is like having the British wing of the German Nazi Party representing patriotic British Germans in Britain during World War Two.

The Leftists and their Jewish fellow travellers also do not care for British Jews, simply because for them their loyalty to the ideology of liberalism is simply based on the belief that immigration, multi-culturalism and the undermining of nationalism as a social and political force is good for them and their leftist / liberal ideology.

At each turn our nation is betrayed, surrendered and undermined by those that control the very functions that should ensure its survival.

If the Liberals in the media want to know who is to blame for Gaza, then it is them.

It is they who have refused to acknowledge and accept the political realities of nations, as they are against Nationalism as a concept.

For the leftists and the liberals Israel is the enemy simply because it is a nation that puts the interests of itself and its own people first.

If the British Jewish community want to know why mobs of screaming Islamists are rampaging through places like Golders Green and attacking Jews, it is because the Zionists that represent British Jews have supported mass immigration, the importation of Islamism and Islamists into the UK and because their Zionist leaders have supported the political parties that support political correctness, multi-culturalism and who rely on political donations from big business linked to Middle East Oil.

The world is the way it is because you allowed it to be.

You voted for them, you supported them and therefore it is your fault.

The BNP has only ever been the solution and not the problem.

Johhny Rotten of The Sex Pistols so eloquently said it best on the 14 January 1978, during the bands final date of their US tour at the Winterland Ballroom in San Francisco.

As he sneered at the crowd after singing just one song , this being a cover of The Stooges ' No Fun', Johnny Rotten looked down at the seething crowd below the stage and said " Ever got the feeling youv'e been cheated. Good night ", then threw his microphone on the floor and walked off stage.


Do you ever get the feeling that youv'e been cheated ?





































Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 4 January 2009

The Real Situation In Gaza and Israel

The reason for the Israeli incursion into Gaza has nothing to do with the bombardment of cheap and nasty rockets fired by Hamas terrorists into Israel. The rockets are being fired by Hamas solely for symbolic and propaganda reasons so as to show the Palestinian people of Gaza that they are 'resisting the Israelis' thereby allowing them to pretend that they are involved in a proper 'palestinian nationalist struggle' as opposed to their real Islamist struggle, and Israel are using the 'threat' of the rockets solely for propaganda reasons to cover their real motive for war. There has been one Israeli killed by the Hamas rockets in the last year. Their presence is not a 'threat' though it does means some Israeli people in towns where the rockets reach have to spend a lot of time indoors - but then again so do old white people in 'enriched' parts of London.

This incursion is not about Hamas's rubbish rockets, it is about Iran.

Hamas has to be smashed in Gaza before Iran can build its nukes and this changes the regional balance of power forever. Once Iran has the bomb then Arab demographics and Assymetric Warfare will destroy Israel - unless Israel can destroy Iranian influence on its borders and in the region whilst it still has the military advantage on the ground.

This sort of 'disinfecting' process whereby Israel is required to sterilise areas of radical Islamist support, such as what Lebanon did last year with the attacks on radical Islamists in its Palestinian refugee camps, is what all nations have to do in order to eradicate Islamist cells who have managed to take over territory either within or on the edges of their borders.

What we saw in the Lebanon with the Lebanese government sending in its troops to eradicate Islamists from their territory, and what Israel is doing now in Gaza, is the same military process that every single nation on earth has to take in order to reclaim its territory back from Islamist insurgents or radical terrorist movements and militias.

It is the war of the future. Get used to the casualties - for without them any nation so infected with Islamism will surrender, rot away into liberal apathy and then dies as it is taken over.

The US has refused to allow Israel to go and attack Iran with military force.

Therefore if Israel cannot contain Iranian military influence in the region by smashing its nuclear weapons programme then it will extirpate its terrorist proxy armies on its borders - therefore it has to smash Hamas in Gaza and Hizbollah In Lebanon.

For those that think what Israel is doing is excessive - that is ridiculous in relation to what Israel militarily can do. Excessive would be the eradication of Gaza with a nuclear weapon. What Israel is doing is what nations do when they secure their national security.

Nationalists must fight for the survival of their nations.

Hamas have probably killed as many of their own Palestinian people as Israel have.

Since they launched their coup against the PLO and the government of the Palestinian Authority hundreds of Palestinians opposed to Hamas have been executed by Hamas since they took power - including Palestinian Nationalists, democracts, libertarians and socialists. Hamas is a totalitarian organisation that is the process of Islamising the Palestinian people and nation - they are a terrorist militia dedicated to the global Jihad funded and controlled by Iran.

As a nationalist I can only support the PLO as the only legitimate government of the Palestinian people. Hamas are an Islamist movement opposed to Nationalism as an ideology and who support a pan-nationalist, pan-racial Islamist movement that is dedicated to the Global Jihad and the eradication of all nation states.

Those Nationalists that see Hamas as a the potential allies of British Nationalism simply because Hamas is an enemy of Israel are idiots. Hamas is ANTI-NATIONALIST and therefore a threat to all nations and nationalists - just as Communism was a threat to all nations eg The Soviet Union, global capitalism is a threat to nations and national economies and the European Union is a threat to nationalism due to its plans for integration of European nations.

As a nationalist I cannot support Anti-Nationalist forces.

A British Nationalist position is against Islamism, domination of our nation by Zionist interests and dependence on Saudi Oil Money. Those that are unable to differentiate between those Zionists in the UK and the nation of Israel are missing the point.

The issue for British Nationalists as regards Israel is irrelevant. Any so called 'British Nationalist' that directly or indirectly promotes the interests of Islamism in its Global Jihad by advocating supporting Hamas, just because Hamas is anti-Israel, is a traitor to the principle of Nationalism itself.

What Israel does - and what Hamas does - is nothing to do with us.

As NATIONALISTS we say that what any nation does, either Palestinian or Israeli, to secure its national security is down to them. That is the primary principle of nationalism itself.

The issue for the United Kingdom is simply the control and domination of our national economic, media and cultural systems by forces influenced or controlled by the Zionist network in the UK and the indigenous Liberal Elite. The Zionist network represent the interests solely of Israel, they do not represent the interests of the Jewish community in Britain. In fact the Zionist network - represented by groups such as the CST, Searchlight, the Labour Friends of Israel, Tory Friends of Israel etc etc have for decades held ideological positions positively detrimental to the British Jewish community eg on mass immigration, multi-culturalism, the appeasement of Islamism etc etc

There are no mutual interests between British Nationalism and Islamism. Israel is an issue for the Arabs, not the British people.

There are though mutual interests between the British Jewish community and British Nationalism - in that both British Jews and British Nationalists recognise the appalling danger that successive Labour and Tory governments have placed Britain in by allowing millions of Islamic immigrants into the UK, by allowing Sharia Law to be introduced into our legal system, by allowing areas of our nation to become Islamic Colonies where separate development under the guise of Multi-Culturalism has created bases for Islamist thought and radicalisation of the growing Muslim demographic.

Both British Nationalists and British Jews have an interest in overthrowing both the Zionist Network, the UK version of AIPAC and its many links, as well the indigenous British idiots of both the Left and Right, the Liberal Elite, who are shackled to both the Liberal Consensus and Political Correctness - which are the two ideological absurdities that are the basis of the stagnation, apathy, passivity and stupidity of the mainstream parties.

It is the agents of the Zionist network, the proxy organisations of the Israeli state that operate in the UK, and the agents of the Liberal Elite, the inner enemies of the indigenous British people who work in political parties both left and right and who control politics, education, the media and culture via their wealth and influence, for the benefit of the Liberal Conensus - that are our mutual enemies.

It is these two social forces - the Zionist Network and the Liberal Elite that are the enemies of British Nationalism.

Israel is an irrelevance to nationalists. The US has exerted tremendous influence on the UK since World War 2, the EU has excercised enormous power in the UK and so have the UN and the WTO - there are many areas of our national life that demand the removal of influence deriving from external supra-national governmental and corporate forces - that does not mean we must treat them all as enemies once we are in power.

Once in power our focus must be solely on enacting internal regime change and consolidating our nationalist revolution, not posturing like a paper tiger and snarling at a hundred foreign enemies because we as a nation and a people were once weak and stupid enough to allow ourselves to be conquered from within.

The enemy has never been anyone other than ourselves, for it is our own people who enslaved us and sold us out.

It was our own people who bent their knee for foreigners gold, who opened the gates of our nation to the foreign hordes, who passed laws allowing the colonisation of our nation, who passed laws that imposed positive discrimination and affirmative action, who passed the vote to send our troops to Iraq and Afghanistan, who signed the contracts that sold our national industries to Middle East Oil, who gave out land to the US to build their air bases on, who obeyed the commands of the Zionists in Israel and who voted yes for the EU.

It was our own idiotic people who are primarily to blame for our plight - not the phantom of Israel that has been raised to a mythical behemoth in the minds of the deranged psychotics that haunt the more disturbed areas of the internet.

The role of Nationalist politics is simply to remove all those agents and forces in our society under the control of external and internal forces who have the power to control and influence the political, economic, cultural and media systems that control our nation and who have done so in such a way that the interests of the British nation and people were damaged in the past - once we have done that, and dealt with those who were responsible for such treasonous activities, then our job is done. Our aim is to restore power to the British people - not to interfere in the internal affairs of other nations simply because at some point traitors in our nation allowed themselves to be corrupted by those that ran those nations at that point in time.

Once we regain control of our nation, then we enact the national revolution that ensures we as a nation are never again enslaved to the interests of other nations nor betrayed by those that were meant to serve the nation and the people but instead served wealth and power.

The mainstream parties cannot abandon their support for the lies and absurdities that form the foundations of the Liberal Consensus and Political Correctness as to do so means they will be accused of being 'racists' by the Liberal and Zionist Elite that control the present political and media systems.

Therefore the only way the British people and the British Jewish community can survive the imminent collapse of the Multi-cultural society is by abandoning both the indigenous Liberal Elite and the Zionist Network at the same time.

Those that say we should support Hamas are not nationalists.

Those that say we should support Israel are also not nationalists.

Our role as Nationalists is to ensure we do not get entangled in their wars.

We must though support the fundamental right of ALL nations to deal with their internal and external national security as they see fit - those moron nationalists that are screaming for the Israelis to be ordered by the UN, the US or the EU to stop the incursion into Gaza are in fact arguing for the anti-nationalist forces of the planet to have the power to interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation state - and even to act to stop the actions of that sovereign state when it securing its own national security interests.

WHAT SORT OF BLOODY IDIOT NATIONALIST CALLS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY TO HAVE THE POWER TO ORDER NATIONS WHAT TO DO IN THEIR OWN BORDERS !

What Israel does today, is what many nations will need to do in the future when faced with the same situation - such as Russia in Chechnya and Serbia with the KLA have understood.

ONLY NATIONALIST MORONS CALL FOR ISRAEL TO BE PUNISHED FOR EXCERCISING ITS OWN NATIONAL POWER TO SECURE IT OWN NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS IN ITS OWN COUNTRY !

ONCE THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HAS THE POWER TO ORDER NATIONS TO STOP, OR INVADE THEM WHEN THEY DONT, THEN THEY WILL NEVER SURRENDER THAT POWER.

THAT IS THE DEATH OF ALL NATIONS.

The only Occupied Territories that should concern us as British Nationalists are the ones in the UK, the towns and cities that have become colonies for mass immigration and centres of Islamist radicalisation.

The Front Line of the Global Jihad is not in Israel - the front line for the UK is at Dover not in Gaza.

Our role is to ensure British troops are returned so that they can be used to fight the War On Terrorists in Britain, and at the same time secure our borders and to assist the police with the removal of millions of illegal immigrants, criminals and Islamist and Zionist extremists from the UK.














Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday, 1 December 2008

Melanie Phillips Lies Again !























Melanie has an interesting article in todays The Daily Mail - but yet again Melanie lies in it.

Here is what melanie says in the article ;

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1090762/MELANIE-PHILLIPS-The-Mumbai-atrocity-wake-frighteningly-unprepared-Britain.html


"
The Mumbai attackers targeted British, American and Indian citizens simply because they wanted to kill as many British, American and Indian 'unbelievers' as possible.

Where they found Muslims, they spared them.

They also singled out for slaughter the occupants of the Chabad House, a pious Jewish outreach organisation with no Israeli or political agenda - underscoring the point that at the core of the Islamists' hatred of Israel festers their hatred of the Jews. "


Lets analyse Melanies lies and propaganda a point at a time ;

1) Melanie says - " The Mumbai attackers targeted British, American and Indian citizens simply because they wanted to kill as many British, American and Indian 'unbelievers' as possible. "

Lie 1 = In The Daily Mail on the 1st December 2008 the actual words of the terrorist captured by Indian police were these - and this is a direct quote from The Daily Mail itself - " He described how its mastermind briefed the group to ‘target whites, preferably Americans and British’. "


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1090546/I-told-kill-breath-Captured-terrorists-account-Mumbai-massacre-reveals-plan-kill-5-000.html

So here we see that Melanie has deliberately removed the word 'WHITE' from the actual statement of the terrorist. Why remove this word, which reveals the PRIMARY targets of the terrorists, and then create a false perception of the terrorists real targets ?

Yet again melanie distorts the truth for her own political ends.

So now we need to analyse what Melanies ends are - and here she states it clearly ;

2) "They also singled out for slaughter the occupants of the Chabad House, a pious Jewish outreach organisation with no Israeli or political agenda - underscoring the point that at the core of the Islamists' hatred of Israel festers their hatred of the Jews. "

Melanies aim is to create out of the terrorist attack a public perception that the primary victims of the attacks were Jews, in order to sustain and create the myth that Jews and Israel are the primary victims of Islamist terrorism.

At the same time in order to bolster her ' myth' she has to minimise and downplay the racist nature of the attacks on WHITES by the terrorists.

Note that the Daily Mail article, which quotes directly from the terrorist himself, does not AT ANY POINT state that the primary, or even secondary victims , of the terrorists were Jews or the occupants of Chabad House - the primary victim of the terrorists, as confirmed by the captured terrorist himself were WHITES.

So where does mel get the idea that the terrorists ' singled out for slaughter Jews' - nowhere at all except in her twisted perception of reality.

Melanie is simply a Zionist propagandist - a hypocrite of the highest order who attacks the BNP for defending the interests of BRITISH WHITES , the primary targets of the attacks, but who will use this attack to uphold the myth that Jews are the primary targets of these groups simply because it suits her political agenda to do so.

But no-one in the mainstream media will dare to challenge for her lies and her disgusting distortion of the truth - simply because it means they would be butting heads with the Zionist Media Network in the UK.

This article of Melanie Phillips is a disgraceful article, for her to minimise the suffering of WHITE BRITISH citizens who died in the attacks as a way to uphold the 'martyr complex' of Jews and to support Israel is a disgusting thing to do.

This article speaks more about Melanie Phillips real agenda than any previous one of her turgid missives has ever done before.

It reveals how insensitive she is to the WHITE British in the attacks and how she will use this attack to bolster the state of Israel itself.

For Melanie the WHITE British dead are simply propaganda tools to be deployed in her defence of Israel.

This article will be used against Phillips in the years to come as an example of how she will distort the truth, and peddle false perceptions to the public, as a way to bolster her own pro-Israel agenda.

Once upon a time this sort of article was called PROPAGANDA.

It is not truth , it is not even comment - it is the peddling of deliberate lies to the public.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Melanie standing up her own Jewish ethnic group and the interests of Israel, in fact in our Multi-Cultural society she is celebrated and applauded for doing so, yet at the same time as she stands up for the interests of Israel and Jews Melanie attacks the BNP for standing up for the interests of the WHITE BRITISH - that is the most stinking hypocrisy one can imagine.














Add to Technorati Favorites

Tuesday, 15 July 2008

Melanie Phillips - The Ultimate Hypocrite

For proof of the ultimate hypocrisy of Melanie Phillips, who recently called me an 'anti-semite' for pointing out her role as the primary spokeswoman for Zionism and Israel in Britain, is her latest blog offering here ;

http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/836626/obama-and-the-eclipse-of-reason.thtml

" I am currently in Los Angeles at the annual convention of Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organisation of America .... "


An interesting meeting Melanie, and what are you talking about there ;

" But it is nevertheless astonishing that American Jews are so blinded by hatred of the Republicans that they are prepared to ignore the fact that Obama speaks out of two sides of his mouth over Israel; ignore the fact that every single one of his foreign policy advisers is hostile to Israel; ignore the fact that he would appease the genocidal fanatics of Tehran; and not only ignore the fact that for twenty years his spiritual adviser was a man who supports the Islamist antisemite Louis Farrakhan but regard it as definitely ‘off-limits’ even to mention it. "

Yep thats right - ISRAEL !

When in a hole Melanie, its best to stop digging.

Heres my version of melanies speech ;

" But it is nevertheless astonishing that British Jews are so blinded by hatred of the BNP that they are prepared to ignore the fact that Brown, Clegg and Cameron speak out of two sides of their mouths over Israel; ignore the fact that every single one of their foreign policy advisers is supine before Israel but also supine before mass immigration and Islam; ignore the fact that they would appease the genocidal fanatics of Tehran because the all rely on Arab oil and are slavish to the Eurabia EU ; and not only ignore the fact that for decades their advisers supported the Islamist Saudi Arabian theocracy spreading global antisemitism and Wahabbism but regard it as definitely ‘off-limits’ even to mention it "

Get the picture yet melanie ?










Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday, 14 June 2008

Brimstone Articles Unearthed

I have discovered some old Brimstone articles on this site here ;

http://www.solargeneral.com/mirrors/British%20National%20Party/www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/brimstone1.html

Here is one old one I wrote for new visitors to this site,

http://www.solargeneral.com/mirrors/British%20National%20Party/www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/brimstone205e8.html?leeId=81

The links to the article quotes still work also I believe ;



MYTHOS AND MURDER.

15th August 2006

In this article I will attempt to debunk the various inane Mythos of all those groups whose actions imperil peace in the world today. Hopefully they will all be equally offended.

Muslim extremists have a saying: "First [destroy] the Saturday People (Jews)... then the Sunday People (Christians). “ It is a common misconception promoted by the media that Muslims are an oppressed people around the world, but the truth is very different. It is in fact Muslims and non-Muslims alike who are primarily oppressed in Muslim nations. Each is the target of the fanatics and the killers.

The fact is that about 35,000 Palestinian Christians (1) live in the West Bank and 3,000 in Gaza, representing about 1.3% of Palestinians and in addition, 12,500 Christians reside in eastern Jerusalem means these people have it tough in areas controlled by Muslims (2). The Telegraph newspaper has reported how a Muslim mafia extorts and use violence against them (3).

The country where the Palestinians are treated worst of all is Lebanon, an Arab nation and a Muslim nation. They are treated like dogs by the Lebanese. Their fellow Arabs leave them to rot in refugee camps instead of assimilating them, so that their suffering can be used a tool by Hezbollah terrorists, Syria and Iran.

In this country we do not leave asylum seekers, and even bogus asylum seekers, to rot in refugee camps surrounded by armed militias that force them to live in poverty and use them to hide behind when the armed militias are targeted for retaliation by the government for their terrorism. No, we give them our houses and pay them welfare benefits. The Arabs don’t do that to their fellow Arabs and yet constantly attack Israel for an event that happened nearly sixty years ago, that being the expulsion of the Palestinians, whilst ignoring the reality of the suffering of Muslims around them. The sad fact is that 95% of the Muslim deaths in the world today are due to their fellow Muslims. Muslims are not slaughtered by the US and Israel; they are slaughtered by their fellow Muslims in Bali, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran etc etc.

Sectarian bloodbath

Places such as Iraq where tens of thousands of Muslims have been slaughtered by fellow Muslims are the main source of Muslim deaths in the world today. The sectarian bloodbath that afflicts Iraq is the result of a theological schism in Islam, not a result of Israel or the Palestinian issue. The Shiite-Sunni divide has existed from the dawn of Islam. In the eyes of the Sunni Islamists, the Shiites not only dominate the oil-rich areas of Iran, Iraq, and the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, but are - through the actions of Hezbollah - attempting to usurp the role of "protector" of the central Mythos of all Arabs: the Palestinian cause.

Shias record the start of the schism with the death of Muhammad, and in their view, a violent coup d'etat against Ali in his first day as Caliph.

After that, Shias contend that they were systematically persecuted and killed by the first three Caliphs of Islam, with a brief respite ensuing during the caliphate of Ali although he was at constant war with those the Shia regarded as their enemies. Sunnis hold that the schism did not begin at the accession of the first Caliph, Abu Bakr, since Ali ultimately swore allegiance and served all his predecessors before his own accession. Sunnis in general reject the dynastic claims of the Prophet's household to the Caliphate. They hold that first Islamic civil war between Ali and the Ummayad Muawiyah 1, whose 20 year rule Shias regard as the most difficult in early Islam, marked the beginning of the breach.

Therefore the war between the theological factions in Islam underway in Iraq and elsewhere across the world also has nothing to do with Israel, the Palestinians and the foreign policy of the US or the UK.

The plight of the Palestinians that fled from Palestine is a legitimate issue only for the Palestinian victims of that tragedy, though it has been hijacked as a PR issue by Muslim extremists, neo-Nazis and anti-Semites. It is for the Palestinian people who lost their homes to fight for justice and to get their homes back. Those Muslims that use the Palestinian tragedy as an excuse to ‘destroy Israel‘, plant bombs in the UK and Iraq or to peddle anti-Semitism across the world on the Internet in the name of White Nationalism or International Communism are nothing more than evil opportunists.

Bloody birth of America

There is nothing more hypocritical than an American White Nationalist that attacks Israel for its 'terrorism' during its creation as a nation. Terrorism was the birth process of the American Republic itself and the basis of the expansionism of the British Empire. The Minutemen Republican separatists that created the first Republican militias to fight against the British Crown were involved in terrorism against the British Crown in their pursuit for their own nation. They were very similar in many respects to the Irgun and Stern gangs of Israel, and both were defined by fighting the same ' enemy', that being the British Empire itself.

The revolutionary process that gave birth to Israel was the same process that gave birth to America. There is only law in the life of nations; only those that fight for their nations, keep their nations. Those that do not fight to retain their nations, lose their nations and are dispossessed by others.

According to historian Harry Ward, the Revolutionary War in America against the British Empire was also a vicious civil war, in which partisans on both sides brutalized those on the opposing side. “Wide sections of territory,” he asserts, “became virtual wastelands as a result of the military appropriation of livestock and provisions, the looting and destruction of homes, and the flight of civilians." Soldiers as well as non-military profiteers not only looted but also murdered and sometimes tortured their victims. Americans, Ward claims, were no less susceptible than others to the dehumanizing effect of war. As one contemporary reports, “The spirit of men became more and more debased. Many a lad, in his simplicity, went into the field with the Militia, and a few months later came back a thorough scamp… [M]en became more and more brutal.” Ward notes that “sadistic violence” on the part of “backcountry rowdies” became more evident after the war than before. The American Revolution, it seems, certainly had its share of atrocities.

At the battle of Kings Mount the rebels had surrounded a heavily outnumbered Loyalist unit, who's position had became hopeless and who had (despite the rebels usually not taking Loyalist militia as prisoners), tried to surrender, but rebels just cut Major Ferguson to pieces and violated his body. They did this to a man whose chivalry in battle had prevented him from shooting George Washington in the back.

General Greene wrote on the 23d of May, 1781, more than five months after he had assumed command of the Southern Department: The animosity between the Whigs and Tories of this State renders their situation truly deplorable. There is not a day passes but there are more or less who fall a sacrifice to this savage disposition. The Whigs seem determined to extirpate the Tories and the Tories the Whigs. Some thousands have fallen in this way in this quarter, and the evil rages with more violence than ever. If a stop can not be put to these massacres, the country will be depopulated in a few months more, as neither Whig nor Tory can live. The rebels also tortured and terrorised those who would not join their army.

Yet today we in the UK see America as a sovereign nation, and we do not use the violence inflicted against our ancestors by Americans to deny America her rights as a nation. (29)

Nazi origins of Israel

What is even more absurd are those neo-Nazis that use the plight of Palestinians as the basis of their attacks on Israel and Jews as a race, religion or as Zionists. Both Hitler and Mussolini were pro-Zionist. The SS themselves trained, armed and shipped the terrorists of the Irgun and Stern Gang to Palestine before and during the Second World War. Those British soldiers that were murdered by the Irgun and Stern gang were victims of the Nazis as much as the Jews. Even the hero of the latter day neo-Nazis, David Duke in his book “My Awakening”, has a section on how the Nazis through the SS, the SD and Zionist organisations worked together to create the state of Israel. (31) (32) (33) (34)

The definition of an idiot is a nazi that despises Jews and Israel, as Israel itself was created through the actions of Hitler and the Nazis themselves.

Just as we built the British Empire by taking land from others, then those that apply a double standard only to Israel for her actions in creating her nation is just a method of concealing the anti-Semitism, hypocrisy and stupidity of the critics of Israel.

Those non-Palestinians who use the plight of the Palestinians for their own political agendas are like paedophiles who use innocent children for own their vile and perverted lusts.

The amount of Palestinians that fled Israel the UN estimates their number at around 711,000 while the Israeli estimate of the refugees is 520,000 and the Palestinian estimate is 900,000. Compare that to the plight of the 16 million Germans who were forced to flee their homes only three years earlier, then you can see in numerical terms the greater tragedy. The fact is that no German terrorist groups dedicated to restoring the land to the Germans who fled their territory exist and they do not use the tragedy of the expelled Germans as an excuse for suicide bombings and nor do they launch hundreds of rockets and missiles into Poland every week.

Closer to home

There are nearly ten million immigrants in this country - and by 2050 we will be the minority. We have never undertook suicide bombings to drive the immigrants out of the country. Unlike in Israel though you do not see the former white residents of the East End, Bradford, Oldham etc carrying out suicide bombings as they have had their ancestral lands taken from them - though you do see Muslims living in those towns doing suicide bombings against us!

In the Irish potato famine from 1845 and 1851 the number of deaths is estimated at between 500,000 and more than one million in the five years from 1846. Some two million refugees are attributed to the Great Hunger. Many people blame the deaths on British economic policy, but the fact is that the event is regarded as a tragedy, not an excuse to wage war against the British, except by a handful of Republican terrorist lunatics.

Some 300,000 British people were sent as indentured labour slaves to the American and West Indian colonies, many of them in chains and who had been sold after being captured and sold as slaves. The ancestors of those people do not wage war on the British state.

Some 1.5 million White Europeans were captured and sold as slaves by islamic slave trading Corsairs (14) during the 17th and 18th centuries, thousands of European captives were snatched from their coastal villages by Islamic slave traders intent on waging war on Christendom. Put into forced labour and appalling living conditions, they perished in huge numbers. (15) The Arab slave trade also included 11 million Black Africans (16). You do not see White Europeans and Black Africans targeting Islamic nations for terrorism as a result of their tragedy at the hands of Islam.

Hundreds of thousands of British and Irish people were shipped to Australia in chains for crimes such as poaching a rabbit to live. (17) Their ancestors do not blow up people on the streets of London for vengeance.

Hundreds of thousands of British orphans and children were sent to Australia, Rhodesia, and New Zealand (18) until the late 1960’s. They do not kill British citizens for the crimes of the British government in the early to late 20th Century.

Indian Partition

In 1949 over 1 million Hindu refugees fled into West Bengal from Pakistan after the Partition of India (21). Massive population exchanges occurred between the two newly-formed nations in the months immediately following Partition. Once the lines were established, about 14.5 million people crossed the borders to what they hoped was the relative safety of religious majority. Based on 1951 Census of displaced persons, 7.226 million Muslims went to Pakistan from India while 7.249 million Hindus and Sikhs moved to India from Pakistan immediately after partition. About 11.2 million or 78% of the population transfer was on the west, with Punjab accounting for most of it; 5.3 million Muslims moved from India to West Punjab in Pakistan, 3.4 million Hindus and Sikhs moved from Pakistan to East Punjab in India; elsewhere in the west 1.2 million moved in each direction to and from Sind. The initial population transfer on the east involved 3.5 million Hindus moving from East Bengal to India and only 0.7 million Muslims moving the other way.

Massive violence and slaughter occurred on both sides of the border as the newly formed governments were completely unequipped to deal with migrations of such staggering magnitude. Estimates of the number of deaths vary from two hundred thousand to a million. (21)

Yet again the Muslims in Kashmir use this shared tragedy as an excuse to wage war against all Indians. They exacerbate the tragedy by perpetuating it.

There are currently 750,000 Israeli refugees fleeing the barrage of Katusha rockets during the struggle against Hezbollah. Yet the media and the anti-Semites regard their plight as irrelevant.

German expulsion

Over 16 million German civilians were expelled from European nations at the end of the Second World War with over 1 million dying in the process (19). As Winston Churchill expounded in the House of Commons in 1944, "Expulsion is the method which, in so far as we have been able to see, will be the most satisfactory and lasting. There will be no mixture of populations to cause endless trouble... A clean sweep will be made. I am not alarmed by these transferences, which are more possible in modern conditions…" (20)

The point is that the world has been a cruel and hateful place in the past, and if every people that has suffered in the past perpetually uses that hatred as a weapon against the people of the present and the future, then the world will always be at war.

The Palestinian people have not uniquely suffered, and therefore they and Islam must act in a way that reflects the universality of their suffering - and that is solely by working to stop future generations suffering. They must not use their past suffering to perpetuate hatred and suffering into the future.

Population movements

There are 323 million plus Arabs in the middle east across 22 countries and a lot of land and only 5.5 million Jews in Israel - the fact that more white UK citizens in 2 years are driven out of this country by immigration than were forced out of Palestine by the Israelis shows how over inflated this hysterical pro-Palestinian propaganda is. More British soldiers died and were wounded in the Falklands war than in Palestine, yet British nationalists do not despise the Argentineans. The British army pulled out of Palestine in 1948, just three years after the Second World War when 400,000 British soldiers had died and 60,000 civilians, yet British nationalists do not hate the German people.

The fact is that population movements are the curse of the modern world. If our people at the rate of 300,000 per year are forced to leave the UK because of the immigrants coming in, and the immigrants are allowed to come in the country at the rate of around 500,000 per year, then Islamic extremists that perpetuate the myth that the Palestinians uniquely suffered at the hands of Israel when they were forced to leave Palestinian territory because of Jewish immigrants coming into their territory, is the Islamic world’s equivalent mythos of the Holocaust mythos of the Jewish extremists.

The Islamic Mythos of the uniqueness of the suffering of the Palestinians is the shadow image of the Holocaust mythos of the Jewish people.

Just as a minority of self serving Jewish extremists seek to perpetuate the myth that the Jewish people suffered a unique crime in the horrors of the Holocaust for political gain for their own ends, so the Muslim extremists of the world seek to perpetuate the myth that the Palestinians suffered a unique crime at the hands of the Israeli state for their own political purposes. The fact is that the suffering of both is neither unique and nor are both Mythos justification for the endless round of horror we see in the world around us today.

Mass murder worldwide

Since 1945 and up to 1987, about 76,000,000 (yes 76 million) people have been murdered in cold blood by one regime or another, around thirteen times the number of Jews murdered in the Holocaust. Most of this democide has been done for political reasons (reasons of state or power), but also much of it has been outright genocide (the killing of people by virtue of their ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality). (22) (23) (24)

Therefore neither the Jewish people nor the Palestinian people have uniquely suffered in a true historical context, and in a perverse mirror image of the other, each has placed a crown of thorns upon their own heads and adopted the role of historical martyrs for the furtherance of their own religious, political, military and economic ends.

The use of the Holocaust as a mechanism of moral blackmail and to silence critics by a minority of self serving Jewish extremists, financial opportunists and moral extortionists also has to end. Until both groups, Jews and Muslims, unite to condemn the exploitation of their dead by the minority of extremists within their own groups, then the living and the majority of innocents will bear the burden of their selfish actions.

Western governments must resist the exploitation of both issues by the self serving minority of opportunists within both communities.

All Holocausts remembered

If we are to have a Holocaust Memorial Day, then it must be a Holocausts Memorial Day and commemorate not just the murder of Jews but also the slaughter of Nationalists worldwide under Russian, Chinese and Cambodian Communism, the enslavement of over a million White Europeans under Islam and the millions of dead Europeans that resisted Islamic expansion into Europe over history, the ongoing tragedy of the murder and enslavement of African Christians and Animists in Sudan, the slaughter in Rwanda and the genocide against the Native America Indian peoples during the creation of Modern America.

Dhimmitude

The status of non-Muslims in Muslim areas is called Dhimmi (4) (5) (6) In Shari’a law, there are official discriminations against the Dhimmi, such as the poll-tax or jizya.

Non Muslims have no legal rights. Jews or Christians may not testify in court against a Muslim and have no legal right to dispute or challenge anything done to them by Muslims. There is no such thing as a Muslim raping a Christian, Hindu or Jewish woman; there is no such thing as a Muslim murdering a non-Muslim (at most, it can be manslaughter). In contrast, a Christian, Hindu or Jew who strikes a Muslim is killed.

Jews and Christians had to walk around with badges or veils identifying them as Jews or Christians. The yellow star that Jews had wear in Nazi Germany did not originate in Europe. It was borrowed from the Muslim world where it was part of the apartheid system of Dhimmitude. (7)

Therefore the so called ‘second class treatment of Palestinians‘ by Israel is also reflected in the way that Islam treats non-believers in Islamic nations and states. Both Islamic extremists and Jewish extremists adopt the same policies towards each other. They are trapped in a cycle of lies and illusions each feeding off the other. Before Islamists start attacking Israel for its treatment of Palestinians, the Islamists should start treating the minorities that exist in Islamic nations they way they would like to be treated. It is the innocent people of all sides that always suffer when the insane elites decide to go to war with each other.

The constant refrain we hear in the media, and from Muslims, is that the current global outbreak of Islamic violence is either due to Israel, the War in Iraq, the plight of the Palestinians, American foreign policy etc. etc. but this is just facile rubbish and propaganda.

This is nothing more than pure propaganda for the media to print as a way to soften public opinion against the crimes of Islamists. The fact is that 95% of Muslims murdered in the world are killed by sectarian conflicts between Muslims and in those nations governed by Muslims the status of Non-Muslims is that of second class and oppressed non-citizens. Even in the Lebanon, a Muslim country; Palestinian refugees, Muslims and non-Muslims are murdered and have their civil rights removed. (12) (13)

The fact is that Islam was founded in the 7th century (610 – 620) and grew as a result of war, violence and murder. Its birth and growth was as a religion of war, not peace. (8) The timeline of the growth of Islam was entirely based on warfare. (9) To say that the current Islamic terror around the world is a new and unique phenomenon is a lie.

Fallacy of American blame

North America and what was to become the United States was not settled by Europeans until the 16th century.

Therefore the fact that Islam had been expanding through war for over 700 years before the United States was even created shows that the excuse that Muslim terrorism and violence is a result of ‘American foreign policy’ and that American foreign policy is the source of Islam’s propensity to violence is utter rubbish.

In 732 Islam had invaded Europe and almost conquered Europe during the Battle of Tours (10) (11) . The First battle of Lepanto took place in 1491 and the Second Battle of Lepanto took place in 1571. This was a decisive naval battle between the Christian fleet and the Muslim-Ottoman Empire occurring on October 7, 1571. It took place in the Gulf of Lepanto, which is an arm of the Ionian Sea. Both these pivotal conflicts with Islamic expansionism into Europe took place before the United States even existed.

The idea that Islam is only now becoming aggressive because of the issues of Palestine, the US sponsoring terrorists in Afghanistan or Israeli aggression is the most vacuous anti-historical, trite, illogical rubbish that anyone can say.

The fact is that Islamic extremists were enslaving us, killing us, conquering us and attacking us long before the US was discovered and Israel was founded. Islamic extremists do so as it is because it is the nature of their interpretation of the religion to do so.

Israel was founded on Friday May 14, 1948.

North America was not discovered by Europeans until 1492. The irony of its discovery is that what was to become the US was only discovered as a nation due to the fall of Constantinople to the Muslims in 1453. The Muslims closed the trade routes to the East and Columbus was trying to find a trade route to India in order to stop the attacks on European merchants who had to pass through Muslim occupied territory.

The greatest irony of history is that the 'Great Satan' was discovered as a result of the terrorism of the Muslims themselves.

Therefore saying that Islam until either 1492 or 1948 was a peaceful and tolerant religion is utter rubbish. It shows both a misunderstanding of the past and the present. The fact intelligent Conservatives and Nationalists talk such rubbish is cringe making. The fact is that Islamic extremist variants of the religion resurface and then go on Jihad every few hundred years – and as the end goal of Islam in their minds is global conquest then they believe that the religion and the world is not ' right ' until it has conquered the entire world. This totalitarian impulse must end.

Inherent evil of Islamic death cults

The current pulse of evil by Islamic extremists was fed and nurtured by the US during the cold war, but it has now entered a dynamic stage of its own.

If people cannot see, after 52 dead people on London streets, the murders of Ross Parker, Kriss Donald, British suicide bombers that we have a problem and still insist it has nothing to do with Islam itself and its toleration of these death cults within its theological framework - then my god when will people learn?

Dr. Zaki Badwari, former Director of the Islamic Cultural Centre of London wrote, "A proselytizing religion [like Islam] cannot stand still. Islam endeavors to expand in Britain. It aims at bringing its message to all corners of the earth. It hopes that one day the whole of humanity will be one Muslim community, the Umma."

Ten of the 13 OPEC nations are Muslim nations. There are currently 1.2 billion Muslims on the planet. They are the fastest growing population on the planet. By 2025, 1 in 4 people will be a Muslim.

Oil is seen by Islamist extremists as the key to defeating the West.

Islam must reform before it controls the planet through its ownership of the oil. In an article on the Brussels Journal it states “In an online story in newspaper “The Daily Telegraph” that was removed “for legal reasons,” former Muslim Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo warned that British Muslims could soon form a state within the state. Dr Sookhdeo believed that “in a decade, you will see parts of English cities which are controlled by Muslim clerics and which follow, not the common law, but aspects of Muslim sharia law.” “In 1980, the Islamic Council of Europe laid out their strategy for the future – and the fundamental rule was never dilute your presence. That is to say, do not integrate.” “Rather, concentrate Muslim presence in a particular area until you are a majority in that area, so that the institutions of the local community come to reflect Islamic structures. The education system will be Islamic, the shops will serve only halal food, there will be no advertisements showing naked or semi-naked women, and so on.”
The next step will be pushing the Government to recognize sharia law for Muslim communities – which will be backed up by the claim that it is “racist” or “Islamophobic” to deny them this “. (27)

Unless the Death Cults within Islam, and its solipsistic obsession with the uniqueness of Palestine as a Muslim tragedy is ended, and also the crass use of the Holocaust card as a way to prevent any legitimate criticism of the political, military and economic activities of individual Jews or of the actions of the state of Israel, such as described by Norman Finkelstein in his groundbreaking book “The Holocaust Industry” (30) is also not addressed then we will stay on the same dynamic that has led to the suffering of the people of the world today. Just as there is resistance to the creation of Islamic states across the Middle East then there will be similar resistance to the creation of Eurabia. (28)

The era of the glorification of martyrs and lies must end, and the era of reconciliation must begin. Those that call the cowards of Hezbollah heroes for hiding amongst civilians and firing rockets at Israel that invites Israeli military retribution that afflicts civilians are the lowest of the low. (25) (26)

The worship of War and the uniqueness of their respective Mythos within both Islam and Judaism and the insane Global Messianism that infects minority sections of both faiths must cease and the struggle for planetary control must instead be replaced solely by the spiritual struggle for the self enlightenment of individuals of the respective faiths. Until that happens the lunatics will be running the asylum.

Friday, 19 October 2007

BBC Funds Terrorism and Tories Apologists for Terrorism

Two great stories in the Telegraph today. The first is entitled ‘ BBC Film Paid for Terror Suspects’ and concerns the BBC documentary ’Don’t Panic I’m Islamic’ which was an attempt by the BBC to brainwash’ the British public into believing that the problem of Islamist terrorists in the UK was just hype by the media.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_4090000/newsid_4096400/4096426.stm

The BBC paid Mohammed Hamid, who also called himself Osama Bin London, to take part in a days paintballing where he and his Islamist terrorist chums wore masks, shot at cardboard cut outs of people and practised war games whilst the Mirandas and Quentins on the BBC production team went around filming them.

Along with Mousa Brown and Mohammed al-Figari, and 13 others, the BBC paid for them with license fee payers money to have a nice day out before they began blowing up London.

In a few weeks time the BBC will also be airing ‘ Don’t Scram, I’m in the Klan’ where they take a party of Ku Klux Klan members from America to Hyde Park in London and get B&Q to deliver a wooden cross a 100 foot high and light it for the benefit of the people walking in the park. This will be shown on the BBC whilst the clan members tell us why they are misunderstood and that they must be tolerated and that their extremism is a result of the oppression of the racist American government run by Israel and because of racist Jews who run the world. I am of course, being facetious as all white extremists are de-humanised, sub-human scum who must never be treated as in any way as being human. Unlike Islamic terrorists of course, these in the eyes of the BBC deserve to be understood, empathised with and awarded with license payers cash.

In the eyes of the BBC the Islamists must be allowed to blame the Jews in America, the Jews in Israel and the Jews in the British media for their terrorism. The BBC also blames the US for Al-Qaeda attacking the Twin Towers on 911, that Mossad may have been in charge of the planes that hit the buildings and that Palestinian suicide bombers must be empathised with and not condemned and that the Muslims of the world are the victims of violence ( by Israel and the US ) and not the aggressors.

Its funny as the Islamists filmed by the BBC, and the BBC itself, sound almost identical to the Muslims in the Conservative Muslim Forum.

Hamid was the person who recruited the 21/7 bombers who just a week later would try and blow up a series of tube trains and buses in London. Four days before the bombing attempts Hamid brought along two of the 21/7 bombers for another day of Jihadist Paintballing, Mohammed and Hussain Osman.

So the BBC in its fervent desire to act as an apologist for the Islamists terrorists threatening the UK decided to ;

1) Commission a BBC documentary that tried to ensure that anyone who was speaking out about Islamist terrorism in the UK was depicted as an ’Islamaphobe’

2) Commission a documentary that gave a false view of the nature of the Islamists in our midst and that tried to brainwash the public into believing the BBC bullshit that WE, and not the Islamists, were the problem.

3) Pay the bombers license fee money which probably went into the coffers of other Islamist terrorists threatening the UK. Yet again good old ’Auntie Beeb’ has cocked up. During the Cold War the BBC employed just about every Communist spy in the country at one time or the other.

Now during the war against Islamist terrorism it employs the apologists for Islamist terrorism, the supporters of Islamist terrorism and the actual perpetrators of Islamist terrorism. There are those who say the BBC is an ’institution’ and that we should treasure it. I say that is complete bollocks.

The BBC is one of the most pernicious mechanisms of social and political brainwashing ever invented. Look at the amount of crap they put on the BBC about ’Climate Change’ and how they promote every spring that melts the ice in Antartica as evidence of global warming. The BBC is a pernicious and poisonous organisation. On one hand whilst it preaches to everyone about its latest moral crusade, it is busy defrauding the people gullible enough to ring its phone quiz shows and donate money to shows like Blue Peter.

The endless ongoing series of scandals about the BBC and its greedy parasitic controllers and staff reveals just how corrupt this ’venerable’ institution is. The fact that anyone still thinks the BBC has any integrity at all, as per its reporting and its propaganda, is merely evidence of just how brainwashed the British public are.

Who is the bigger idiot - the BBC, or the mugs and saps that still believe what the BBC tell them and who still carry on throwing their money at its scams.


Tory Muslims Group Think Iran should be able to have nuclear bombs.

The next article in the Telegraph of interest is ‘ Muslim Tories ; Iran has a Right’ where a Muslim body set up by David Cameron to advise the Tory Party on Muslim issues has criticised Britain as being too close to Israel ( usually this phrase is used an a euphemism for being under the control ‘of the Jews’ ) and that Israels treatment of the Palestinians is the cause of Islamic terrorism around the world ( an Al Qaeda propagandist position ) and have also said that Iran has a legitimate reason for wanting to acquire nuclear weapons in order to defend itself from a nuclear armed Israel ( also an Islamist propaganda position ).

Though Israel has never threatened to wipe Iran off of the map with its Nuclear bombs, the fact that Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the map when it gets a nuclear bomb is irrelevant to these Muslims in the Tory Party Muslim group.

The Muslim group is run and funded by Lord Sheikh a Tory Party donor and a Tory peer, rewarded with a peerage after being a party donor in 2005. He was recently named as one of the 100 most influential people on the political right in the UK.

In his speech to the Northampton Muslim Council on the 19th November 2006 , Lord Sheikh wrote “The Muslim community is diverse and Muslims have come here from different parts of the world. Despite this we should all have the concept of Umah and the Brotherhood of Islam “.

The word Ummah is an Arabic word that comes from Ummah Wahida in the Koran and it means One Community or One Nation and indicates that Muslims belong to the Nation of Islam and not just the British nation state.

The word Umah is either used to indicate the Pan-Arabic Nationalism version of the Ummah, a coalition of Islamic nation states or the global version of the Islamic community where nations are replaced with the Global Caliphate. In the Islamist version of the global Ummah then Sharia law would be the basis of the law and all non-Muslims kept under Dhimmitude status.

By explicitly linking the various Islamic faith sub-sets, Islamic nations around the world and Muslims from various nations who are present in Britain into the singularity of the Brotherhood of Islam and unity under the Ummah, then Lord Sheikh is creating the foundation for a situation of Dhimmitude for non-Muslims.

As a lawyer he knew what he was talking about when he gave the speech. Lord Sheikh then goes on to explicitly reject extremism and violence, but the fact is that the concept of the Umah as a trans-national global caliphate is the central dynamic of Jihad in the world today.

It is also the basis of the demand for Sharia law to be imposed by various Islamist extremist groups in the UK. By using a term, and defining that term in the way he did, it implies that for Lord Sheikh that Muslims in the UK form a single community and that everyone else is outside that community. That regardless of whether the Muslim is Sunni, Shi-ite or Sufi or any of the smaller sub-sets, they form one community and all non-Muslims are outside that community.

One cannot just talk about the Umah and not clarify ones definition of it. In relation to the use of the word Umah by Lord Sheikh in the speech, the reference cannot refer too ;

1) the Pan-Arabic Nationalist version of the Umah

2) the union of various Islamist states into an Umah of Islamic nations Therefore it can only refer too;

3) the Umah of the global caliphate which is based on Sharia Law

4) the Umah of all UK Muslims forming a separate community within the British nation

Option 1 is obviously not what he was referring too, option 2 is also not what he was referring too, option 3 is still open as an option or finally option 4. Option 4 is the basis of the beginning of a dynamic leading to separatism leading to eventual Sharia law within the UK.

If Muslims form a separate community within the UK based solely on them being Muslims, and thereby existing as a unified community regardless of their racial, ethnic, sectarian and national backgrounds, then this means Lord Sheikh is saying that Muslims exist in a form of social separation from the rest of the British people. That Muslims form a single community, and all other peoples, religions and groups either form a single community of being non-Muslims or they form their own community groups and that there is no such thing as British society, just a series of separate communities existing in the geographic region of Britain. This is the basic assertion of all those groups who demand the imposition of Sharia law in the UK for muslims.

He advocates Muslims join political parties to promote Islam, he advocates that Muslims get into Parliament to represent Islam and he advocated Muslims working together. The fact that a Muslim group exists within the Tory Party suggests that the interests of Muslims as group exist, and that as this group exists there are times when the interests of the group will conflict with the interests of the wider community.

Advocating that Iran be has an moral justification for being allowed to acquire nuclear weapons is an example when the interests of the Muslim Tory group conflict with the interests of the wider British community. It may be in the interest of Muslims as part of the Umah to have Iran armed with nuclear weapons, but in relation to the strategic and geo-political interests of the UK it is not in the interests of the UK to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons.

That strategic National Interest test should apply equally to both British Muslims and British Non-Muslims. If we are all part of one National Community as British citizens, then British Muslims should be putting the interests of Great Britain before that of the Umah. By saying that Muslim interests are not linked to British national security interests then they have placed the interests of themselves and their members outside the British state itself. They have placed their own interests as part of the Umah before that of the interests of the British Nation itself.

The fact that Muslims within the Tory Party are now explicitly calling for Iran to be allowed to have nuclear weapons is proof that the interests of the Umah, and the Muslims in the Muslim Tory Group, are not in accord with the interests of Great Britain. The fact that the Muslim group in the Tory Party are putting the interests of the Umah before the National Security interests of the UK is an alarming development.

If the Tory Party has allowed a Muslim group to develop within its own ranks that cannot separate the national security interests of the UK from the global interests of the Umah and Iran, then that is a disturbing development.

As Political Correctness infects the Tory Party then if the Tories ever stumbled into power then this would mean that they would be open to the charge of racism in their own ranks if they refused to bow down to the demands of the Muslim lobbyists in their own ranks.

Though Iran has said all along that it does not seek to acquire Nuclear Weapons, the fact is that if the Tories were in power then they would be under pressure from the Islamists in their ranks to allow Iran to develop them. The fact that the Muslim Tory group says that Iran is building nuclear weapons contradicts Iran saying its just wants nuclear power facilities.

Its good to know the Tories would allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. The fact is that if Iran wasn’t after nuclear weapons why did Iran pay A.Q. Khan 8 million dollars for the blueprints and equipment to build an nuclear bomb ?

The fact is that Iran wants a nuclear bomb and will use it on Israel.

Therefore any Muslim group, whether inside the Tory Party or outside it, that supports Irans right to acquire nuclear weapons or that sympathises with Irans development of nuclear weapons places itself in contradiction to the interests of the British state. It is not in the interest of the British state that millions of refugees have to flee Israel into Britain and Europe. It is not in the interest of the British nation that another Islamic nation develops and owns nuclear weapons. It is not in the interest of the British people that nuclear technology and materials may be passed to other Islamic terrorists. It is not in the interest of the British nation that under the aegis of nuclear weapons an army of united Arab nations launch a conventional war on Israel that they cannot defeat. It is not in the interests of the Uk that Iran is able to control the last of the worlds oil supplies via its control of Iraq via a proxy government of Shi-Ite militias and hold the West hostage via assymetric warfare. It is not in the interests of the West that Iran invades Saudi Arabia via a Shi-ite dominated Iraq and invades Kuwait and takes control of the Kuwait and Saudi oil wells and uses the threat to drop nuclear bombs on US troops to prevent the US retaliating. It is not in the interests of the West to have Iranian terrorists explode a nuclear bomb smuggled into Britain via a container port. Iran would not ever attack the US as the Americans would respond in kind, if the Iranians ever exploded a nuclear bomb in the UK they know that the British government would never retailiate as they are too weak to do so. Thats why we are the target for Iran and not the Americans. The Americans stil have big bollocks, whilst we are run by a bunch of effiminate liberal assholes. Thats why we are the real target for terrorists with nuclear weapons, not the US.

The fact that the Tory group puts the interests of the Umah, Muslims and Iran, before that of the British people and the British state is a sign that the Muslims in the Tory Group regard themselves as separate from the British state.

The fact the Conservative Muslim Forum is also demanding a rewriting of history to place Islam at the centre of British history and Western Civilisation and then to indoctrinate children with that propaganda in schools and that it believes that preachers who reject democracy as the basis of the British state should not be refused entry or deported from Britain shows how extreme this group is.

This group funded by Lord Sheikh and run from Tory Party central headquarters should be closed down and booted out of the Tory Party. It wont be though, as the Tories are so scared of being called racist they would rather allow the extremists to stay in their ranks than confront them. Imagine what would happen once the Tories are in power - and just how dangerous it would be to have a party as gutless and weak as the Tories dealing with Islamist terrorism. If they tolerate this, what else would they tolerate.