Showing posts with label bbc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bbc. Show all posts

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

BNP Panorama Show and The Evil Trioka

There is truly nothing sadder than the remaining zombies left in the BNP.

Though they call the public 'lemmings' for believing everything they are told by the BBC and MSM, at the same time the Griffinite Lemmings believe everything they are told by the BNP and Griffin.

If the British people are lemmings for believing what the BBC tells them - then what are BNP members for believing everything the BNP and Griffin tell them ?

Anyone who isnt a window licking BNP moron knows by now that Griffin is as bent as a nine bob note and that the BNP is a shoddy, corrupt cult of amateurs whose best talent and most experienced people have been purged or walked from the party - leaving only a cabal of halfwits and lickspittles whose ever more desperate attempts to evade reality shame the name of British Nationalism and undermine the cause of British Nationalism.

As for the show I impressed by Mark Collett, he really appears to have grown up and after his experiences of recent years become a humbler person.

Lets hope that at some point he rejoins the movement and puts his many talents to good use in the nationalist movement.

Hopefully not as a disciple of the old style idiot nationalists like Eddy Butler, a Griffin clone, whose attitude, ideas and methodology and operating style are mirrors of Griffin himself.

Griffin and Butler are what I call Old Style Nationalists - arrogant autocrats with no concern for their party members or the ideology of nationalism - they are egotists motivated by self interest and hate for those who they feel have slighted them and whose arrogance allows them to evade all embrace of political realities - such as regarding party money, accounts and income as irrelevances to be used as they wish rather than as the law dictates.

Jim Dowson was hilarious, he reminded me of a character from Paul Kayes Phoenix Nights TV show - the jock con man / 1950's spiv - pound signs flashing in his eyes as he 'milked the cows' of the party donors.

All he did was change the labels on his rattling tins from 'Anti-Abortion Charity' to 'BNP'.

Brilliant - the man is beyond being satirised.

The fact that people take him seriously proves that there will always be people who will send fifty grand by electronic transfer to General Ombongo of the Nigerbanvu Government in order to get fifty million pounds and a goat back from the lost safety deposit box of the former President Mr. Ommiwalosewoo.

The real tragedy though was the last image of Dave Hannam.

Dave was a true nationalist and patriot.

We may have had our differences, but you always knew Dave was a British Nationalist.

The attacks on Dave by Griffin and Butler - the Gruesome Twosome - were disgusting.

The fact that the window licking BNP retards didnt walk away after reading the attacks on Dave by Griffin, and the cabal of halfwits and idiots around Butler didnt stagger off either after his vile abuse of Dave Hannam, shows us that neither of them are worth a toss.

Those sick attacks on a dead man revealed the moral rot in these pitiful husks of so called 'men' Griffin and Butler - they are worthless, venal, vile little egotist arseholes.

The allegations are clear - the BNP is insolvent and under investigation by the EU and the Met Police and the DPP.

Sooner or later the BNP is finished.

Griffin, Dowson and Butler killed it.

Dowson corrupted Griffin.

Griffin decided to put the money he could make before the party and his principles.

Butler then tore the BNP apart to benefit the English Democrats, a party for which Steve Uuncles admitted Butler had been working for at least two years before he left the BNP.

That sort of treason is unforgivable.

Those three idiots destroyed the best political hope we had at the time for saving Britain.

The fact that around all three of the evil troika of Griffin, Butler and Dowson are cabals of foot licking fools proves that the true problem of British Nationalism is that instead of it being a movement of free thinkers and leaders it is instead a cult of personality based on lemmings prostrating themselves before corrupt halfwits.

Who is responsible for the problems of the British Nationalist movement - in the end its the followers of the fools who pose as saviours but whose real agenda is self enrichment and evil egotism.



















Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday, 12 October 2009

The Mark and Joey Story




Image - Ken Kesey, the author of One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest and whose involvement with the CIA run Project MK Ultra where the CIA gave him LSD resulted in the liberal counter culture of the 1960's exploding into the cultural mainstream of American life.






It is not often a news story defines the Zeitgeist of an era.

One such story is the 'Joey and Mark' story - even though it has an exceptionally gay sounding title this is not actually a gay marriage story.

The Joey and Mark story began with the pink shirt wearing Roy Greenslade article in The Guardian about a BBC interview of two unknown BNP chaps, Joey and Mark, and it has now become a kaleidoscope of Guardianista pink shirted journos, BNP 'black shirts', Daily Mail blues, Labour reds, snotty greens to African orange men.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2009/oct/12/bbc-bnp

This damned story is so bright, its given me a migraine.

Its a psychedelic press debacle, the Electrik-Kool Aid test for the modern media merry pranksters.

Ken Kasey, a man I consider one of the most successful peaceful revolutionaries in history alongside Christ, Buddha, Gandhi and the Roman poet Horace, would be proud of this planned insanity.

The ashes of Timothy Leary will be tumbling with laughter in orbit.

The very fact the media have failed to analyse their exact positions is hilarious, as for instance ;

1) The idea that a democracy must be 'rigged' to ensure that certain opinions that conflict with the liberal opinions of minuscule self appointed social elites are either denied a platform or that if aired, they must be attacked is evidence that the very basis of our democracy has been eroded.

If the liberal system is so weak that a true fascist uprising may occur at any moment if a single inflammatory opinion gets on the airwaves, then the only thing we can blame is liberalism for this crisis. Liberalism and liberal values are responsible for the fact that our society is so polarised on the grounds of race that only repression of democracy and free speech is the way to keep order, not the BNP.

In fact the mechanism of liberalism has produced the worst of all possible worlds.

Liberalism itself has laid the foundations of a fascist 'uprising', or so it keeps telling everyone as justification for its fascist repression of democracy and civil rights such as free speech, at the same time it has adopted fascist methodology to deny and usurp free speech and democracy.

It has adopted the terrorism of the word used by fascism - except now the epithet 'Jew' has been replaced with 'Racist'.

At the merest mention of the word racist an individual is dehumanised, their civil rights removed, their right to employment damaged, their right to join a trade union removed, their names and addresses used for political targeting by the left and their homes and privacy invaded by the media.

This is classic fascist terrorism - the same as experienced by Jews in Nazi Germany.

The irony is of course, as Churchill wrote, that the 'New Fascism will be anti-fascism'.


2) That when a nationalist party, called 'racist' by the media and liberal elite, is entitled to appear on the media because of the impartiality rules on the BBC, a public broadcaster which is supposed be politically neutral but which bans BNP members from working for the BBC, that such an appearance must be met with public demonstrations, protests from the audience and an anti-BNP rigged panel designed to rig the anti-BNP debate for a rigged anti-BNP audience.

This is a pathetic joke.

This also shows how terrified the liberals are.

The only reason why the liberals are in power, and the political parties that are in power, is because the corporate media put them there.

The minds of the mass of the public are merely putty for media propaganda to mould and manipulate.

The moment that the message from the BNP is able to be beamed into the minds of the British public, then the system controllers know that this could 'change minds'.

Changing minds is the dangerous power of the media WMD, those Weapons of Mass Deception (as Tony Blair once called them).

The system controllers rely on all parts of the media propaganda matrix reinforcing the propaganda of all the other propaganda producers - they all have to agree on the BNP being 'bad' and actively pumping out anti-BNP propaganda to get the public to believe this, and this porcess is called 'Consensus Building'.

The public are taught what to think within a paradigm of accepted opinion and anti-opinion.

Left, middle and Right of any debate is held by the system, and anyone who steps over the lines defined by three is denied the right to a platform by the system -or have to be attacked by all parts of the system simultaneously in order to counteract the message.

This is not democracy.

This is mind control.

An individual is not capable of being an individual if their opinions, ideas and values are simply decanted into them via media conditioning.

That is a state of mental slavery.

The irony being of course that people like Ken Kesey ushered in the era where the Hippies became liberals and then the liberals became Fascists.



Switch Off Your TV's.

Switch On Your Mind.

Rise Up And Revolt.


















Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 31 May 2009

ANDREW MARR - BBC Apologist for Genocide



Image - Andrew Marr in this months Playgirl " Gollem Gets Butt Naked ".





Image - Andrew Marr interviews the Butcher of Baghdad, the Murderer of the Serbs and the accomplice of KLA ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. " Yes my precious, I will make sure you keep the ring of power ".




It appears that Andrew Marr of the BBC,, one of the premier liberal fascists of the state media, attacked the BNP on his show this morning.

YAWN - what a surprise (not!).

Here is a quote from Andrew Marr as stated in a brilliant article released by John Pilger a few days ago.

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2009/05/john-pilger-bang-on-target.html

" The same was true of the lawless attack on Iraq in 2003, behind which the cross-party Establishment and the political media rallied.

Andrew Marr stood in Downing Street and excitedly told BBC viewers that Blair had “said they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath, and that in the end the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both of those points he has been proved conclusively right.” When Blair’s army finally retreated from Basra in May, it left behind, according to scholarly estimates, more than a million people dead, a majority of stricken, sick children, a contaminated water supply, a crippled energy grid and four million refugees.

As for the “celebrating” Iraqis, the vast majority, say Whitehall’s own surveys, want the invader out. And when Blair finally departed the House of Commons, MPs gave him a standing ovation – they who had refused to hold a vote on his criminal invasion or even to set up an inquiry into its lies, which almost three-quarters of the British population wanted.


Andrew Marr is a lickspittle of the Labour government and an apologist for genocide.

He and his media cronies beat the drums for the Iraq War and then sought to act as apologists for the total disaster it became.

To be abused and villified by scum such as Andrew Marr is our greatest validation.

When devils cast stones at you and call you a sinner, then you know you truly are one of the good.




















Add to Technorati Favorites

Thursday, 5 February 2009

Government Media BBC Tries to Break Strikes

A very interesting article in the Guardian about how the BBC were telling lies on the news last night when they said that a deal had been reached with the unions over the ending of the strikes.

When the BBC seeks to engineer society and change peoples perceptions in order to influence behaviour - then that is brainwashing and propaganda and not the actions of a legitimate and impartial organisation.

The BBC is the mouthpeice of political correctness and is in the pocket of the government - who pays the piper calls the tune.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/feb/04/strikes-unions

A union representing workers at the Lindsey oil refinery currently on strike over the employment of foreign staff, has rejected a deal proposed in talks with the owner, Total.

Officials from Unite told demonstrators at the north Lincolnshire site that there was no truth to rumours that a deal had been struck last night under which half the jobs would go to British workers.

They described such talk as "lies and rumours" designed to get the protesters back to work.

"This news is as big a surprise to us as it is to yourselves," Phil Whitehurst, of Unite, told the crowd. "When we left the meeting yesterday, the deal that you heard on the television this morning was not in place whatsoever."

Keith Gibson, another union official, told protesters they had rejected an Acas deal put forward last night.



At the same time as the BBC is lieing to the public, the Times editor Mary Riddel in an article here tells us how xenophobic we are to for not enjoying having polish nannies, a latvian driver and cheap builders for her mansion in Lincolnshire as she does.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/maryriddell/4516854/British-jobs-for-British-workers-is-the-cry-of-our-worst-instincts.html

With her usual middle class drive by sneer and smear, the stuck up tart tells us of her journey by plane in first class from Switzerland and her trip to Harrods and then lectures us how we are all 'xenophobic' for wanting to put the interests of British workers before her having cheap domestic staff from foreign nations.

Twat.

The issue of the BBC trying to smear the strikers as racist is also covered in another article here in The Guardian ;


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/03/race-bbc

Why is the BBC obsessed with making working-class people seem racist?

Watching BBC news bulletins yesterday, it was very easy to believe claims that the current spate of wildcat strikes is inherently motivated by xenophobia. Constant emphasis was placed on objections to "foreign workers" per se, rather than fear of workers' wages being undercut, which would seem to be the real issue.

The 10 o'clock bulletin gave us a good example. A voiceover by the BBC's political editor, Nick Robinson, (about 12 mins in) told us: "Beneath the anger, ministers fear, lies straightforward xenophobia." Cut to woolly-hatted worker telling BBC reporter: "These Portugese and Eyeties – we can't work alongside of them." There we are: northern white bloke refusing to work with foreigners. Case closed.

Except, watch Paul Mason's report on Newsnight, featuring the same interview (about 4:30 in):


These Portugese and eyeties – we can't work alongside of them: we're segregated from them. They're coming in in full companies.

Even taking into account the dodginess of the use of "Eyetie" to refer to an Italian person, one has to admit that it would be very difficult to portray the second, full quote as racist or xenophobic. It's a statement addressing basic workplace issues – British workers literally cannot work alongside foreign workers, as they are separated. There really is no excuse for editing and presenting a quote in such a misrepresentative manner, unless one is setting out to prove something – namely, that working-class people are racists.

The BBC does have form on this, unfortunately: last year's White season was almost exclusively concerned with portraying white working-class people as paranoid and racist. This despite the fact – and this really needs to be repeated until it's firmly implanted in every bien pensant liberal's head – that white working-class people are the most likely to have friends of other races and religions, and are most likely to marry and have children with people of other races and religions. Not the behaviour of a resentful army of racists.

The apex of the White season's utter weirdness was a Newsnight interview with the BNP's Nick Griffin, author of Who Are The Mindbenders, a 1997 pamphlet detailing how "the Jews" control the BBC and other media. Griffin was interviewed on his own, and then we were taken in to a panel discussion featuring, among others, Bob Crow and Nick Ferrari (both of whom had obviously refused to share a platform with Griffin, hence the solo interview). Hardly natural bedfellows, Crow and Ferrari took turns lambasting the BBC for its portrayal of working-class people. It was an encouraging sight.

But even after this spectacular dressing down, the practice persists. Why? Is it because of a skewed identity politics at play in BBC newsrooms and commissioning meetings? Or is it because the BBC, like much of the media, is increasingly dominated by middle-class scions who don't actually know many working-class people, and thus breezily project any prejudice or other trait they wish on to them? Either way, it's a sordid state of affairs, and – as shown by the devious editing of last night's 10 o'clock news, a dangerous one, too.



















Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 25 January 2009

The BBC, Gaza and Overpopulation

A few weeks ago I posted the article below about how the UN and EU are subsidising a population explosion in Gaza.


http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2009/01/west-over-population-and-gaza.html


80 % of Gaza's population depend on foreign aid to eat and breed.


On the Channel 4 news tonight it featured some old Palestinian guy sitting in the ruins of his house that had been bombed by the IDF.

The Channel 4 journalist stated that he had THIRTEEN CHILDREN and dozens of grandchildren.

What sort of idiot in a place where 80 % of the people depend on foreign aid has 13 bloody kids !

Imagine if he was white and working class with 13 kids and living in Leeds or Bradford, you can just imagine the sneers from the White liberal elite scum who sooooo sympathise with the plight of the poor Palestinian people. They would call him a scrounger, a fool etc etc.

One rule for whites - another one for everyone else of course.

In effect the world is subsidising the global Jihad and Hamas.

Gaza is so over populated because the Palestinians do not need to work. They just have as many kids as they can and know the West will subside and feed them.

They must be laughing their bollocks off at the liberal idiots that fund the Global Jihad - on one hand we get Dhimmitude in the UK and we also sponsor the demographic conquest of Islam in the Middle East.

Whilst the US is condemned for subsidising Israel, the world is silent about the UN and EU subsidising Gaza over population.

If the people of Gaza had to live within their means, then the poverty of the place would be minimal.

It is this idiotic subsidising of global over population by demented leftists, who are usually enviromentalists as well, that is destroying the planet.

You cannot be an environmentalist and remain silent about global over population.

You cannot subsidise feckless idiots that refuse to stop having children and save the planet.

As for the BBC - the bbc are about as imprtial as Pravda during the Soviet Union.

They are not doing the appeal for the country to give money to allow the feckless in Gaza to keep spitting out kids as they know that the Zionists in the BBC will spit their dummies out at the anti-Israel Jewxs in the BBC.








Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday, 10 January 2009

BBC Lie Machine At Work AGAIN !

A few years ago the BNP were infiltrated by a BBC reporter ( note how the BBC have never sent a reporter into Respect or Workers Power or Anti-Fascist Action or Searchlight ) and this reporter filmed a couple of BNP activists who he got drunk and invited them to talk rubbish.

Donal McIntyre when he did his investigation of Combat 18 supplied cocaine to people in the programme in order to bolster his credentials as a criminal.

The BBC in the article below hired a gangster to get some dumb kid to pose with a shotgun for a tv show - now that kid is in prison.

Will the BBC be prosecuted for facilitating this offence - of course not.




January 10, 2009

Youth was paid £50 to ‘show off’ with a gun for BBC Panorama programme
Russell Jenkins

A teenager was paid £50 by a “fixer” employed by the BBC to brandish guns on a Panorama programme about young gangs.

The youth, aged 17, who cannot be identified, was traced by police after the footage was shown. At Liverpool Crown Court yesterday, he admitted three counts of possessing firearms.

The teenager says that he was not paid the cash directly by the BBC but by a gang member who told him that the film-makers wanted someone to “show off”. He was then given a shotgun, a handgun and ammunition for the filming. The prosecution accepts the youth's version of events.

The allegation raises serious questions about the BBC's journalistic ethics. The documentary Young Gunmen was shown on June 30 last year. There were concerns at the time that gang members had been paid to buy and pose with weapons.
Related Links

Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Chief Constable of Merseyside, wrote to Mark Thompson, the corporation's Director-General, seeking assurances that no cash had changed hands. At the time the BBC denied the “unfounded rumours”.

Last night the corporation insisted that its journalists had not breached editorial guidelines. Sources at Panorama said that the programme's producers had no knowledge that part of the fixer's payment was used to pay the teenage gunman.

Sentencing was adjourned, and the teenager was remanded in custody.








Add to Technorati Favorites

Friday, 7 March 2008

BBC Newnight Interview














Image - Bob 'HogSqueal' Crow and his deputy at the Labour Party conference spying on the buffet to make sure no-one but Bob could eat all the pies.


















Image - Jon 'The Goblin' Gaunt on his way to the Newnight TV sudio from the hole in the ground he lives in.


Stayed up to watch Newnight last night as Nick was on it.

I blinked and missed his interview.

I guess the only way they can deal with real interviews is to edit them into a joke after they have finished. Thats Paxman and now Wark who have both tried to tame the Griffin and failed, so I guess that post-Interview editing is the basis of BBC journalism these days.

What a bunch of sad pussies the journalists in the BBC are.

The motto for the New BBC Journalism is ' We cant interview - So we Edit '.

Jon ' The Goblin ' Gaunt was also on the show.

What a rancid little verminous arse clinker that man is.

There he was shouting at the autism victim margaret Hodge about her oh so regal policy of 'giving the peasants cups of tea and chocolate biscuits' and blaming her for the countries ills.

Margaret Hodge the multi-millionaire is the Labour equivalent of Marie Antoinette, just that instead we get told to have cups of tea and eat choccy biscuits instead of eating cake.

Hey gaunt you fat little scuttling cockroach, its the paper that you work for - THE SUN - wot won it for Labour , remember - you hypocritical little turd.

There is the Goblin Gaunt banging on about the damage done by Labour when it is the paper that pays him an exorbitant wage for his infantile dribblings that got Labour into power.

Fat twat.

How I laughed when he shouting about ' I am working Class' - no Goblin, you aint.

Working class is where you are, not where you are from.

You now live in a very posh house in a very posh and very white part of the country with a very large wage and a very nice pension - you are about as working class as the millionaire Billy Bragg ( Bollinger Bolshevik) or Bob Crow ( Trade Union boss on about fifty grand a year with unlimited expense accounts paid for by the union).

You fat little prick you aint working class and nor was Bob HogSqueal who sat next to you looking like a toothless turnip with a migraine.

You and HogSqueal are both Smirking Class, the fake working class parasites in the media that are on wages and incomes that put them in the top 10 % of the population but who like to display their faux working class accents as their credentials.

What a pair of dicks.

Bob Hogsqueal though is an exceptional scumbag. Here is a man who bangs on about the working class yet who supports mass immigration tht takes the jobs and cuts the wages of the working class.

It is Bob and the rest of the Communist shit in this country who support mass immigration that have destroyed the lives of the Working Class.

The idea that Black Working Class and Indigenous Working Class have ANYTHING in common is bollocks, -

1) the ethnics have Positive Discrimination laws to allow them to take better qualified indigenous working class applicants jobs even if they are less qualified than the white applicant,

2)they have Affirmative Action plans that allow them to go on specialised training schemes that get them fast tracked into their jobs and that give them unfair advantages over white indigenous applicants,

3)When they go to job interviews for jobs in public bodies those public bodies have a duty in law to have a certain percentage of workers who are from ethnic groups so they have a duty to choose them instead of white indigenous applicants,

4) employers of ethnics are scared to sack them if they are incompetent because they are scared of being taken to employment tribunals for racism

5) even organisations like the Police have been found guilty in employment tribunals of racism against white applicants for jobs so as to get more ethnic in the police. Even the firebrigade refuse white applicants jobs to get ethnics in the service.

6) Even the BBC is running schemes to get more ethnic in the organisation. As if one twat like Lenny Henry wasnt enough.

It aint journalists like Kirsty Wark, radio presenters like the Goblin, Trade Union bosses like Hogsqueal, royalty like Margaret Hodge and Conservative party candidates like the black geezer on the show that are losing THEIR jobs to immigrants. They and their jobs are very nice and safe thank you very much.

Its a pity they didnt pick any real working class people to go on the show instead of the pseudo-working class puppets they did invite in.

They should have invited in brickies, scaffolders, plumbers and the unemployed and asked them to talk instead of the people they did invite in to talk.

Oh well, we all knew this BBC season was going to a load of patrionising bollocks put forward by the BBC as a way to take the piss out of the Indigenous English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish working class.

The idea that the BBC would EVER do anything for the British Indigenous Working Class is a joke, seeing as it run by a cabal of communists and the scions of media dynasties like Lew Grade.

Thursday, 6 March 2008

BBC Con Trick - The White Season




Image - This is not Andrew Marr though it does look like him. These are BBC mugs and there are plenty of those in the BBC.









The BBC 'White Season' of films is as usual nothing but a con.

The 'White British Working Class' terminology that the BBC are supposedly seeking to represent in this documentary series do not exist - this is because the term 'white british' applies to EVERY white person in the country - from Poles to Lithuanians to Russians and Germans.

In this country there are ;

1) The Indigenous British who are Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scottish and a mixture of all of them

2) Assimilated White British who are not indigenous but British in culture, values and way of life and who love Britain eg Poles who have taken on British citizenship

3) Assimilated Non-White British who are not indigenous but British in culture, values and way of life and who love Britain eg Jamaican Christians who have taken up British citizenship after being raised in the British Commonwealth

4) and then the rest of the people in this country who are neither assimilated nor British though they may possess little bits of paper called passports that say they are British but that are in fact passports for colonists to colonise our country in the name of Political Correctness and Multi-Culturalism. They are colonists not British Citizens.


We repudiate the nonsense of a catergory of White British as genocidal, racist claptrap designed to ensure the indigenous people of Britain are deined their right to exist as recognised ethnic communities.

If we accept the term White British as legitimate then we accept the CRE definition of the law that everyone who is white can be British and that the interests of the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots as racial, ethnic and national groups do not need to be taken into consideration.

The BBC and the government demand that all other racial and ethnic groups that they are taught about their specific ethnic culture, history and identity - but this is denied for the Indigenous English, Welsh, Scots and Irish.

They are fed PC pap about mass immigration and Britishness.

We demand that the White English Indigenous Children of Britain ( and the White Indigenous Welsh, Irish and Scottish children) are taught their ethnic history, not PC crap.

Instead of being taught about who we are, instead we are being fed some bullshit 'inclusive' definition of White British by the BBC that seeks to replace the narratives of our indigenous histories as English, Welsh, Irish and Scots with one that includes the story of all those non-British peoples that have entered the country.

This is why the series is about White British and ot about the Indigenous British.

A White British identity means nothing - it merely denies English, Welsh, Scots and Irish children their unique ethnic community status, cultures and history and allows the BBC to replace their identities with a bogus PC version of Britishness that includes Poles, Russian etc etc just because they are white.

The notion of the White British means that the BBC can impose Positive Discrimination policies for ethnics as they do not have to investigate whether the interests of the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish in the BBC are being met. Seeing as the English are not even mentiond on census and race forms then how can their interests as a community be met - until we are recognised as existing then our interests are denied and forgotten.

The fact that all Whites are lumped together into the racist definition of White British is in itself racist - just as is the concept of Black British. They both imply that the only thing that matters for the group is skin colour and that the various national and ethnic differences between the members of those groups are irrelevant.

Jamaicans and Africans are not the same just because they are black and nor are Irish of ethnic Irish descent and Northern Irish of ethnic English descent. Just because both are white or black does not mean they are the same or have the same interests.

Under the racist blanket terms like White British then the rights of the Indigenous English and even their status as existing is denied.

Using the phrase White British means ;

1) The interests of the Indigenous English, Welsh, Scots and Irish need not be considered

2) That our children are not taught their ethnic and cultural history but rather a bland PC version of Britishness

3) That aliens and immigrants if they are white cn be classified as White British and the rights of the Indigenous British not considered

Using the definition of White British means that the mass migration of Poles into the UK over recent years means that this is now part of our historical narrative as regards PC Britishness - and not what it should be regarded as which is an economic invasion.

The phrase White British means that as soon as those Poles in Britain apply for a passport then hey presto they become White British.

Whilst Poles can get passports to call themselves British, the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots cannot get their status as Indigenous Britons stamped on their passports.

The law as it stands recognises the existence of the English as a National, Ethnic Group and a racial group but does not give us any protection under the race relations acts and laws as regards our civil and social and legal rights - and we therefore demand the recognition of the Indigenous English, Indigenous Welsh, Indigenous Irish and Indigenous Scottish people as RACIAL, ETHNIC and NATIONAL groups under the terms of the Race Relations Act in the UK and that we be recognised as existing both in law and in practice.

This is because the term White British allows the government to define anyone white as British and also because the term white british is used to deny the existence of the indigenous peoples of these British Isles as even existing in any legal way and thereby allows the CRE and government to pass off foreigners as English, welsh, scots and irish.

This term White British is nonsense, as Poles and Russians are not British even though they are defined as such by the term White British.

Though Poles and Russians may become British Citizens through marriage and assmiliation, the fact remains that Poles, though white, are NOT indigenous British.

Even if they had a British passport they would still be Poles with a British passport. They could become British Citizens , but not Indigenous Britons.

They are welcome to the join the BNP as our equals if they are British Citizens as they are fellow Europeans and fellow British Citizens, but they are not Indigenous British and Indigenous Britons.

The term Indigenous British and Indigenous Britons applies only to the descendants of the Indigenous British, whilst the term White British means the indigenous British people may not as well exist.

If all of Poland entered the UK and the whole of Britain moved to Poland then under the BBC and CRE definition of White British - the Poles would become British and the British become Poles. This is of course a nonsensical and almost genocidal position.

The term white british should be repaced by the term INDIGENOUS BRITONS and used to cover ONLY the RACIAL, ETHNIC AND NATIONAL GROUPS the Indigenous English, the Indigenous Welsh, the Indigenous Irish and the Indigenous Scottish and also those who are of mixed blood of those indigenous ethnic groups.

If this is done the indigenous British peoples would come under the full protection of the Race Relations Acts.

The term white british is a term recognised by the CRE as covring all those who are white in Britain, and this means it is not related in any way to the interests of the indigenous communities of this country.

This is why the British National Party Constitution was changed in order to define the indigenous British as the indigenous English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish peoples of our Islands.

This BBC season should have been about the Indigenous White English Working Class, as it is the Indigenous White English working Class who have borne the brunt of mass immigration - not the White British Working Class who as a class do not exist.

Mass immigration has primarily impacted on England and not Wales, Ireland or Scotland and not on the White British.


Our Demands ;


1) That the Indigenous British be recognised in law as covering the existence only of the indigenous English, Irish , Welsh and Scottish peoples as members of those ethnic, racial and national groups and as Indigenous Britons. That only the descendants of Indigenous Britons may be classified as Indigenous Britons or as Indigenous members of the ethnic, racial and national groups of England, Wales, ireland and Scotland that they be allowed to self define themselves as members of, or as Mixed Indigenous British.

2) That the law gives full rights to the members of those indigenous ethnic, racial and national groups under the Race Relations Act

3) That the term White British be prohibited as being used on ethnic and racial monitoring forms and replaced by Indigenous English, Indigenous Welsh, Indigenous Irish and Indigenous Scottish and Mixed Indigenous British.

4) That the legal definition of Indigenous Britons apply only to those who are from the indigenous racial, national and ethnic communities of the Britain and that this be stamped on our passports. Our passports must state that we are indigenous Britons - and not just British Citizens or slaves of the EU

5) That the indigenous status of the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots be recognised in British and International law.

6) That the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots be taught their own culture, history and identity in schools and not fed a PC version of fake Britishness.

7) That the term White British be used to describe in law only those who are of non-indigenous backgrounds, who are white and who have fully assimilated into Britain and British culture and who have been given British Passports



The BNP represents the interests of the Indigenous British People but also all those groups of ASSIMILATED White British Citizens and also all those Non-White ASSIMILATED British Citizens who have rejected the insane cult of Multi-Culturalism and who are totally British in character and culture.

Assimilation means respecting the fact that in Britain the British people make our laws, our culture comes first and that our way of life takes precedence over all others and that people either assimilate into our country and obey our laws and ways or they leave.

Those people from the Old Commonwealth who are Black, Christian and British by culture have been sold out by the cult of political correctnesss and multi-culturalism. They have seen Britain abandon all those virtues that they came here for in the first place.

They came here because Britain was BRITISH, because the British people rulEd their own country and because Britain had a BRITISH culture and was ruled by the British people for the benefit of the British people.

They have seen the indigenous British traitors amongst us and their alien allies surrender our country, liberties and culture to multi-culturalism, the US, UN and the EU and have seen the loss and abandonment of our British culture and Identity.

The BNP represent not only the Indigenous British Peoples but also all those that put BRITAIN FIRST and BRITISH CULTURE FIRST regardless of their race, colour or creed.

Those that respect and love Britain and British culture are our allies and friends regardless of their race, colour or creed, but those who are of our own blood and who have betrayed us are our enemies.

Those who do not assimilate are colonists and colonisers NOT BRITISH CITIZENS !

Friday, 19 October 2007

BBC Funds Terrorism and Tories Apologists for Terrorism

Two great stories in the Telegraph today. The first is entitled ‘ BBC Film Paid for Terror Suspects’ and concerns the BBC documentary ’Don’t Panic I’m Islamic’ which was an attempt by the BBC to brainwash’ the British public into believing that the problem of Islamist terrorists in the UK was just hype by the media.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_4090000/newsid_4096400/4096426.stm

The BBC paid Mohammed Hamid, who also called himself Osama Bin London, to take part in a days paintballing where he and his Islamist terrorist chums wore masks, shot at cardboard cut outs of people and practised war games whilst the Mirandas and Quentins on the BBC production team went around filming them.

Along with Mousa Brown and Mohammed al-Figari, and 13 others, the BBC paid for them with license fee payers money to have a nice day out before they began blowing up London.

In a few weeks time the BBC will also be airing ‘ Don’t Scram, I’m in the Klan’ where they take a party of Ku Klux Klan members from America to Hyde Park in London and get B&Q to deliver a wooden cross a 100 foot high and light it for the benefit of the people walking in the park. This will be shown on the BBC whilst the clan members tell us why they are misunderstood and that they must be tolerated and that their extremism is a result of the oppression of the racist American government run by Israel and because of racist Jews who run the world. I am of course, being facetious as all white extremists are de-humanised, sub-human scum who must never be treated as in any way as being human. Unlike Islamic terrorists of course, these in the eyes of the BBC deserve to be understood, empathised with and awarded with license payers cash.

In the eyes of the BBC the Islamists must be allowed to blame the Jews in America, the Jews in Israel and the Jews in the British media for their terrorism. The BBC also blames the US for Al-Qaeda attacking the Twin Towers on 911, that Mossad may have been in charge of the planes that hit the buildings and that Palestinian suicide bombers must be empathised with and not condemned and that the Muslims of the world are the victims of violence ( by Israel and the US ) and not the aggressors.

Its funny as the Islamists filmed by the BBC, and the BBC itself, sound almost identical to the Muslims in the Conservative Muslim Forum.

Hamid was the person who recruited the 21/7 bombers who just a week later would try and blow up a series of tube trains and buses in London. Four days before the bombing attempts Hamid brought along two of the 21/7 bombers for another day of Jihadist Paintballing, Mohammed and Hussain Osman.

So the BBC in its fervent desire to act as an apologist for the Islamists terrorists threatening the UK decided to ;

1) Commission a BBC documentary that tried to ensure that anyone who was speaking out about Islamist terrorism in the UK was depicted as an ’Islamaphobe’

2) Commission a documentary that gave a false view of the nature of the Islamists in our midst and that tried to brainwash the public into believing the BBC bullshit that WE, and not the Islamists, were the problem.

3) Pay the bombers license fee money which probably went into the coffers of other Islamist terrorists threatening the UK. Yet again good old ’Auntie Beeb’ has cocked up. During the Cold War the BBC employed just about every Communist spy in the country at one time or the other.

Now during the war against Islamist terrorism it employs the apologists for Islamist terrorism, the supporters of Islamist terrorism and the actual perpetrators of Islamist terrorism. There are those who say the BBC is an ’institution’ and that we should treasure it. I say that is complete bollocks.

The BBC is one of the most pernicious mechanisms of social and political brainwashing ever invented. Look at the amount of crap they put on the BBC about ’Climate Change’ and how they promote every spring that melts the ice in Antartica as evidence of global warming. The BBC is a pernicious and poisonous organisation. On one hand whilst it preaches to everyone about its latest moral crusade, it is busy defrauding the people gullible enough to ring its phone quiz shows and donate money to shows like Blue Peter.

The endless ongoing series of scandals about the BBC and its greedy parasitic controllers and staff reveals just how corrupt this ’venerable’ institution is. The fact that anyone still thinks the BBC has any integrity at all, as per its reporting and its propaganda, is merely evidence of just how brainwashed the British public are.

Who is the bigger idiot - the BBC, or the mugs and saps that still believe what the BBC tell them and who still carry on throwing their money at its scams.


Tory Muslims Group Think Iran should be able to have nuclear bombs.

The next article in the Telegraph of interest is ‘ Muslim Tories ; Iran has a Right’ where a Muslim body set up by David Cameron to advise the Tory Party on Muslim issues has criticised Britain as being too close to Israel ( usually this phrase is used an a euphemism for being under the control ‘of the Jews’ ) and that Israels treatment of the Palestinians is the cause of Islamic terrorism around the world ( an Al Qaeda propagandist position ) and have also said that Iran has a legitimate reason for wanting to acquire nuclear weapons in order to defend itself from a nuclear armed Israel ( also an Islamist propaganda position ).

Though Israel has never threatened to wipe Iran off of the map with its Nuclear bombs, the fact that Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the map when it gets a nuclear bomb is irrelevant to these Muslims in the Tory Party Muslim group.

The Muslim group is run and funded by Lord Sheikh a Tory Party donor and a Tory peer, rewarded with a peerage after being a party donor in 2005. He was recently named as one of the 100 most influential people on the political right in the UK.

In his speech to the Northampton Muslim Council on the 19th November 2006 , Lord Sheikh wrote “The Muslim community is diverse and Muslims have come here from different parts of the world. Despite this we should all have the concept of Umah and the Brotherhood of Islam “.

The word Ummah is an Arabic word that comes from Ummah Wahida in the Koran and it means One Community or One Nation and indicates that Muslims belong to the Nation of Islam and not just the British nation state.

The word Umah is either used to indicate the Pan-Arabic Nationalism version of the Ummah, a coalition of Islamic nation states or the global version of the Islamic community where nations are replaced with the Global Caliphate. In the Islamist version of the global Ummah then Sharia law would be the basis of the law and all non-Muslims kept under Dhimmitude status.

By explicitly linking the various Islamic faith sub-sets, Islamic nations around the world and Muslims from various nations who are present in Britain into the singularity of the Brotherhood of Islam and unity under the Ummah, then Lord Sheikh is creating the foundation for a situation of Dhimmitude for non-Muslims.

As a lawyer he knew what he was talking about when he gave the speech. Lord Sheikh then goes on to explicitly reject extremism and violence, but the fact is that the concept of the Umah as a trans-national global caliphate is the central dynamic of Jihad in the world today.

It is also the basis of the demand for Sharia law to be imposed by various Islamist extremist groups in the UK. By using a term, and defining that term in the way he did, it implies that for Lord Sheikh that Muslims in the UK form a single community and that everyone else is outside that community. That regardless of whether the Muslim is Sunni, Shi-ite or Sufi or any of the smaller sub-sets, they form one community and all non-Muslims are outside that community.

One cannot just talk about the Umah and not clarify ones definition of it. In relation to the use of the word Umah by Lord Sheikh in the speech, the reference cannot refer too ;

1) the Pan-Arabic Nationalist version of the Umah

2) the union of various Islamist states into an Umah of Islamic nations Therefore it can only refer too;

3) the Umah of the global caliphate which is based on Sharia Law

4) the Umah of all UK Muslims forming a separate community within the British nation

Option 1 is obviously not what he was referring too, option 2 is also not what he was referring too, option 3 is still open as an option or finally option 4. Option 4 is the basis of the beginning of a dynamic leading to separatism leading to eventual Sharia law within the UK.

If Muslims form a separate community within the UK based solely on them being Muslims, and thereby existing as a unified community regardless of their racial, ethnic, sectarian and national backgrounds, then this means Lord Sheikh is saying that Muslims exist in a form of social separation from the rest of the British people. That Muslims form a single community, and all other peoples, religions and groups either form a single community of being non-Muslims or they form their own community groups and that there is no such thing as British society, just a series of separate communities existing in the geographic region of Britain. This is the basic assertion of all those groups who demand the imposition of Sharia law in the UK for muslims.

He advocates Muslims join political parties to promote Islam, he advocates that Muslims get into Parliament to represent Islam and he advocated Muslims working together. The fact that a Muslim group exists within the Tory Party suggests that the interests of Muslims as group exist, and that as this group exists there are times when the interests of the group will conflict with the interests of the wider community.

Advocating that Iran be has an moral justification for being allowed to acquire nuclear weapons is an example when the interests of the Muslim Tory group conflict with the interests of the wider British community. It may be in the interest of Muslims as part of the Umah to have Iran armed with nuclear weapons, but in relation to the strategic and geo-political interests of the UK it is not in the interests of the UK to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons.

That strategic National Interest test should apply equally to both British Muslims and British Non-Muslims. If we are all part of one National Community as British citizens, then British Muslims should be putting the interests of Great Britain before that of the Umah. By saying that Muslim interests are not linked to British national security interests then they have placed the interests of themselves and their members outside the British state itself. They have placed their own interests as part of the Umah before that of the interests of the British Nation itself.

The fact that Muslims within the Tory Party are now explicitly calling for Iran to be allowed to have nuclear weapons is proof that the interests of the Umah, and the Muslims in the Muslim Tory Group, are not in accord with the interests of Great Britain. The fact that the Muslim group in the Tory Party are putting the interests of the Umah before the National Security interests of the UK is an alarming development.

If the Tory Party has allowed a Muslim group to develop within its own ranks that cannot separate the national security interests of the UK from the global interests of the Umah and Iran, then that is a disturbing development.

As Political Correctness infects the Tory Party then if the Tories ever stumbled into power then this would mean that they would be open to the charge of racism in their own ranks if they refused to bow down to the demands of the Muslim lobbyists in their own ranks.

Though Iran has said all along that it does not seek to acquire Nuclear Weapons, the fact is that if the Tories were in power then they would be under pressure from the Islamists in their ranks to allow Iran to develop them. The fact that the Muslim Tory group says that Iran is building nuclear weapons contradicts Iran saying its just wants nuclear power facilities.

Its good to know the Tories would allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. The fact is that if Iran wasn’t after nuclear weapons why did Iran pay A.Q. Khan 8 million dollars for the blueprints and equipment to build an nuclear bomb ?

The fact is that Iran wants a nuclear bomb and will use it on Israel.

Therefore any Muslim group, whether inside the Tory Party or outside it, that supports Irans right to acquire nuclear weapons or that sympathises with Irans development of nuclear weapons places itself in contradiction to the interests of the British state. It is not in the interest of the British state that millions of refugees have to flee Israel into Britain and Europe. It is not in the interest of the British nation that another Islamic nation develops and owns nuclear weapons. It is not in the interest of the British people that nuclear technology and materials may be passed to other Islamic terrorists. It is not in the interest of the British nation that under the aegis of nuclear weapons an army of united Arab nations launch a conventional war on Israel that they cannot defeat. It is not in the interests of the Uk that Iran is able to control the last of the worlds oil supplies via its control of Iraq via a proxy government of Shi-Ite militias and hold the West hostage via assymetric warfare. It is not in the interests of the West that Iran invades Saudi Arabia via a Shi-ite dominated Iraq and invades Kuwait and takes control of the Kuwait and Saudi oil wells and uses the threat to drop nuclear bombs on US troops to prevent the US retaliating. It is not in the interests of the West to have Iranian terrorists explode a nuclear bomb smuggled into Britain via a container port. Iran would not ever attack the US as the Americans would respond in kind, if the Iranians ever exploded a nuclear bomb in the UK they know that the British government would never retailiate as they are too weak to do so. Thats why we are the target for Iran and not the Americans. The Americans stil have big bollocks, whilst we are run by a bunch of effiminate liberal assholes. Thats why we are the real target for terrorists with nuclear weapons, not the US.

The fact that the Tory group puts the interests of the Umah, Muslims and Iran, before that of the British people and the British state is a sign that the Muslims in the Tory Group regard themselves as separate from the British state.

The fact the Conservative Muslim Forum is also demanding a rewriting of history to place Islam at the centre of British history and Western Civilisation and then to indoctrinate children with that propaganda in schools and that it believes that preachers who reject democracy as the basis of the British state should not be refused entry or deported from Britain shows how extreme this group is.

This group funded by Lord Sheikh and run from Tory Party central headquarters should be closed down and booted out of the Tory Party. It wont be though, as the Tories are so scared of being called racist they would rather allow the extremists to stay in their ranks than confront them. Imagine what would happen once the Tories are in power - and just how dangerous it would be to have a party as gutless and weak as the Tories dealing with Islamist terrorism. If they tolerate this, what else would they tolerate.

Wednesday, 19 September 2007

BBC acts as Al Qaeda Propagandist

As many of you who read this blog wil know I regard the majority of the media hacks in the country as mewling maggots feasting on the corpse of our society and who should be branded with the words VERMIN on their foreheads. At best they are vultures who profit from death and horror, at worst they are directly responsible for the majority of ills in our society.

One of the worst, and most corrupt media institutions i9n our country is the BBC. The BBC is the biggest employer of freaks, degenerates and left wing assholes in the country. It is run by a cabal of Sharia Socialists and demented Liberals that think the BBC is nothing more than a mechanism for the creation of a left wing Multi-Cultural society. The BBC does not report the news, it tries to create a New Socialist Society.

The latest BBC example of how they use the power of the media to manipulate peoples mind comes via a report at Damian Thompson's Daily Telegraph blog about an item on the BBC Newsround website. The Daily Telegraph is a Tory paper, so it prints stories that flatter the fops and popinjays in the Tory Party. Attacking the BBC is ok for the Telegraph as the BBC attack the Tories.

Newsround is like the news for kids who realise Teletubbies arent real. Its job is to brainwash our young people and inculcate white guilt at the state of the world and make them feel responsible for the plight of all suffering people of the planet ( which as well all know is primarily the fault of the idiots in charge of those countries suffering problems eg Mugabe and Zimbabwe. ) It follows the Michael Moore principle of politics which is ' Blame Whitey For Everything '. It usually offer stories of poor non-white indigenous peoples suffering from war/famine etc which are designed to emotionally manipulate young white kids into becoing crusaders for the poor of the world after they leave school. As a result of this emotional conditioning these white kids then leave university after doing social work degrees and then join organisations like VSO or The Red Cross etc etc. Many of these ' crusaders' then end up dead/raped/shot in some rat infested, third world shit hole where they have wasted their youth trying to get the natives to stop doing to each other what they have been doing to each other for centuries and what they will still be doing to each other in centuries to come.

The Newsround site greeted the 9/11 anniversary by stating, under this headline, "Why did they do it?" the following:

The way America has got involved in conflicts in regions like the Middle East has made some people very angry, including a group called al-Qaeda - who are widely thought to have been behind the attacks. In the past, al-Qaeda leaders have declared a holy war - called a jihad - against the US. As part of this jihad, al-Qaeda members believe attacking US targets is something they should do. When the attacks happened in 2001, there were a number of US troops in a country called Saudi Arabia, and the leader of al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, said he wanted them to leave.

HERE ARE A FEW QUESTIONS ;

1) Why say widely believed to be behind the attacks - do they think remote controlled planes flown by MOSSAD agents flew into the towers ( even though Al Qaeda have now aired more than 9 of the hijackers ' martyr videos' claiming responsibility for the attacks )

2) Al Qaeda has been attacking the West for years before the Iraq / Afghanistan War and have been attacking 'apostate' fellow Muslims for just as long - are they saying that the fact that Islamic extremists attack the West is our fault ?

3) Are the BBC saying that attacking America is a legitimate option for those fed up with American foreign policy ?

Yet again the BBC , and the wankers that infest it, are using their powers to spread propaganda that is nothing more than apologism for terrorism. The fact that this crap is being peddled to kids on the Newsround website makes it even more insidious.

The BBC is a joke. No-one in this country should pay their TV licenses. Why should we pay to be lied too by a bunch of coke snorting, degenerate, left wing assholes.

The fact that the BBC has even ripped off the poor deluded simpering kids who sell their tear sodden teddy bears and train sets to build wells for the latest ( never ending ) failed third world state. Blue Peter is a sick disgrace. They even used Childline to make money for themselves and their own staff members.

I regard this endless emotional manipulation of our kids as a national disgrace. Whilst they are raising money for the Third World , 20-30,000 of our own old people die of hypothermia a year and more than 50 % of old people who enter hospital for medical treatment are suffering from clinical malnourishment. Our owld people are literally starving to death in their own homes - they either keep the heat on and starve or dont pay the heating bill and die of cold. Whilst Blue Peter and Children In Need likes to highlight the plight of ethnic suffering, the suffering of our own people is minimised and ignored - unless of course they are ethnic, ex-gang members in need of a new sports centre in Peckham or some other 'trendy' ethnic cause .

The BBC bosses use the license fee like a smack head uses heroin. They dont have to care whether the money is squandered as we are forced to pay for it whether we want too or not. A few years ago they used to imprison poor single mothers for not pying their TV license whilst the BBC executives used to go un junkets to the Bahamas to talk about ways to make more money for themselves.

BOYCOTT THE BBC LICENSE FEE - DONT PAY THE TV TAX.