This research document below proves that the only way multi-culturalism can work is if social apartheid is imposed.
This also follows the work of Robert Putnam in his book 'Bowling Alone' that proves that the result of communities becoming racially diversified and culturally diversified is that social cohesion and social capital are destroyed.
Diversity does not strengthen a society - it destroys it.
The Broken Society has been caused by Multi-culturalism itself.
This proves my ideology of Cultural Nationalism is 100 % correct.
Multi-culturalism will end in comunal racial and ethnic violence.
The only way to avoid that is if the different racial and cultural communities are forced into different territories and and allowed to develop seperately same as the South African model.
This means either apartheid and colonisation or a civil war in the future.
That scenario of apartheid is unacceptable to the liberal left who imposed multi-culturalism and hence we will merely see a collapse of multi-culturalism and increasing levels of ethnic and racial violence in the future.
The only way to ensure the ethnic and cultural violence is prevented is to demand FULL CULTURAL INTEGRATION OF ALL IMMIGRANTS INTO THE HOST COMMUNITY CULTURE and deport all those who refuse or resist this cultural integration requirement.
On the grounds of National Security then multi-culturalism must be dismantled and all those who refuse to integrate into British Culture totally must be deported from the UK.
Only by demanding full cultural integration can the breakdown of society into communal racial and cultural violence be prevented.
Therefore this research validates my political thesis and ideological position totally.
(PhysOrg.com) -- History is filled with examples of ethnic violence, the type that erupts when people with differing cultures attempt to live side by side. The Middle East comes to mind, as does Northern Ireland or Yugoslavia. What’s not so common are studies done that show what sorts of things actually work to prevent problems when people of dissimilar backgrounds live next door to one another. Thus, a new study done by Yaneer Bar-Yam and his team at the New England Complex Systems Institute, appears to be particularly relevant. He and his colleagues, describe in their paper on the preprint server arXiv, how a study they’ve done of the ethnically diverse country of Switzerland, shows that political and geographical boundaries have served to keep the peace between the different groups.
Ads by Google
Microsoft® Office 365 - Your Favourite Office Programs Are Now Available Anytime, Anywhere. - www.microsoft.com/office365
Switzerland, the very modern symbol of a peaceful country, might have gone another direction the team finds, were it not for the way the differing groups (French, German and Italian) and religions (Catholic and Protestant) have been physical grouped within the borders of the small country.
Those of German descent make up the largest group, taking up most of the north, central and eastern parts of the country while those with Italian backgrounds live predominately in the south; those of French descent have settled mainly in the west. Not surprisingly, those of the Catholic faith live predominately in the southern and middle parts of the country, due to the influx of those of Italian descent, while those of the Protestant faith live mainly in the rest of the country.
To find out how all these differing groups found a way to get along, the team looked at the geography of the country (mainly mountains and lakes) and how its regions are subdivided. In Switzerland, areas of the country are partitioned into what are known as cantons, which are similar to states in other countries except that each has much more autonomy than is usual. After careful study, the team found that the main reason the groups all manage to get along, is because they are separated from one another. Each canton is comprised of almost all the same types of people, essentially ruling themselves, thus, there is very little overlap. Other areas are separated by lakes or mountains. The end result is that people of differing cultures very seldom run into one another (except in the larger cites of course) and thus friction is averted. The one exception appears to be a little area north of Bern, where violence did erupt in the 1970’s. That problem was apparently fixed by simply redistricting the cantons in that area.
One problem with the study of course is that it doesn’t take into account the history of the land itself. The problems with India and Pakistan, for example, or with Israel and the rest of the Middle East aren’t likely to be solved by building better borders. But, nonetheless, the study does shed a rather bright light on the idea that simple separation can sometimes lead to peace. Not unlike how a schoolteacher might solve a problem between two quarreling youngsters.
More information: Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence, arXiv:1110.1409v1 [physics.soc-ph] arXiv:1110.1409v1 [physics.soc-ph]
We consider the conditions of peace and violence among ethnic groups, testing a theory designed to predict the locations of violence and interventions that can promote peace. Characterizing the model's success in predicting peace requires examples where peace prevails despite diversity. Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence. Here we analyze how peaceful stability is maintained. Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups. Mountains and lakes are an important part of the boundaries between sharply defined linguistic areas. Political canton and circle (sub-canton) boundaries often separate religious groups. Where such boundaries do not appear to be sufficient, we find that specific aspects of the population distribution either guarantee sufficient separation or sufficient mixing to inhibit intergroup violence according to the quantitative theory of conflict. In exactly one region, a porous mountain range does not adequately separate linguistic groups and violent conflict has led to the recent creation of the canton of Jura. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that violence between groups can be inhibited by physical and political boundaries. A similar analysis of the area of the former Yugoslavia shows that during widespread ethnic violence existing political boundaries did not coincide with the boundaries of distinct groups, but peace prevailed in specific areas where they did coincide. The success of peace in Switzerland may serve as a model to resolve conflict in other ethnically diverse countries and regions of the world.
© 2011 PhysOrg.com
Friday, 14 October 2011
Multi-Culturalism Creates Violence
Posted by Defender of Liberty at 03:31
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment