Monday 16 June 2008

Jewish Chronicle Interview

Had another call from Dana at the Jewish Chronicle today about my article 'Burn Down Hollywood' about how the power of the Jewish elite that run Hollywood is being abused to undermine the Anglo-European community in the US and Europe.

I was very surprised that Dana had not ever heard of or read Kevin McDonalds book 'The Culture of Critique' which chronicles the role of Jewish intellectuals and activists in American society.

The fact that the Jewish community has disproportionate power over various sectors of American society is only controversial to those that think those Jewish groups are doing something wrong.

If you you have nothing to hide, then why fear debate ?

Link Here - http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books.htm

I explained to Dana that due to historical racism in American society against Jews, this has led to the Jewish community becoming concentrated in various specific sections of US society, and one of those sections is Hollywood, including the media and the entertainment industry.

This racism directed at the Jewish community in the past has also led to their admirable ethno-communalism and their power as a community as defined by lobby groups such as AIPAC. This process is not unique to Jews though, as the Irish who also suffered racism in US society also have organised the second strongest lobby group in US society, this being the Irish-American lobby groups.

Whilst AIPAC dominates American foreign policy towards Israel, the Irish lobby groups historically used their power to allow American donations to fund the IRA terror campaigns to flow to Ireland, assisted US arms entering Ireland and Northern Ireland, used their powers to turn the USA into a refuge for fleeing IRA terrorists and to undermine the British states fight against the IRA through US political interference.

Whilst these lobby groups may have once been set up to serve and DEFEND the interests of the communities they served, I assert that they have begun to abuse that power long ago and have begun to use their political power to undermine other community groups and to hijack American politics for their interests - and not for the interests of all Americans.

I explained to Dana that it is both admirable and legitimate for any community to organise to protect, defend and represent their own community interests in a democracy, but what is not acceptable is when those groups use their power in any society to undermine, usurp, weaken and attack other communities or to undermine the community interests of other communities.

When defence becomes offence this is not acceptable.

I explained that whilst Hollywood has gone past the 1950's era of depicting all Native Americans as barabrous painted savages or the 1930's era of depicting blacks as servants and illiterate cotton pickers, it has now developed a fetish for depicting Muslims as terrorists and the English / Russians / Blondes as evil racists, fascists, crooks, hitmen etc etc.

White English males are now routinely depicted as thugs, nazis or crooks, Muslims as terrorists and white blonde females are depicted as sluts.

I explained that this process is akin to the demonisation and community undermining process as seen recently in Rwanda, in that this process of pumping out negative propaganda is creating an impression that these communities are somehow infereior or innately evil.

Positive Propaganda is acceptable in that it seeks to promote and create positive role models for communities within our culture and thereby develop a culture of aspiration in those communities, but Negative Propaganda is what the media and Hollywood pump out when they seek to conflate criminality with specific racial groups and ethnic communities and when they seek to undermine the cohsion and identities of communities.

Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM) was a Rwandan radio station which broadcast from 8 July 1993 to 31 July 1994. It played a significant role during the April-July 1994 Rwandan Genocide.

The station's name is French for "Thousand Hills Independent Radio and Television", deriving from the description of Rwanda as "Land of a Thousand Hills". It received support from the government-controlled Radio Rwanda, which initially allowed it to transmit using their equipment.

Widely listened to by the general population, it projected hate propaganda against Tutsis, moderate Hutus, Belgians, and the United Nations mission UNAMIR. It is widely regarded as having played a crucial role in creating the atmosphere of charged racial hostility that allowed the genocide to occur.

Propaganda that seeks to perpetuate or create stereotypes that seek to dehumanise a section of the community or to portray them as sub-humans is a crime against humanity, it is classified as an incitement to genocide.

In the past Hollywood has done this many times ranging from the depictions it pumped out of Native Americans, Blacks and to now the Anglo-European community.

Dana seemed surprised that I said that it is a well known fact that Jews dominate Hollywood. Seeing as this is something the Jewish community frequently boasts about and mentions, then I cannot see why she would be surprised.

For example, Marlon Brando complained on the Larry King Live show on april 5th 1996 that, "Hollywood is run by Jews - it is owned by Jews!". Marlon Brando's chief complaint was that the Jews in Hollywood are always depicted in a way that is positive and aspirational. The Jewish writer Michael Medved wrote in the magazine Moment in 1996 that, "Jewish writers and directors employ unquestionably flattering depictions of Jews for audiences to react with sympathy and affection."

Compare that with recent Hollywood depictions of Catholic Preists, Anglo-European women as promiscuous sluts, white working class people as racist bigots and thuigs, the English as crooks and hooligans and the imagesof blacks as gangsters/ criminals and misogynistic rappers.

The American Moment Magazine was subtitled, "The Jewish Magazine for the '90s".

Its edition of Aug. 1996 stated "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?" The author was the Jewish writer Michael Medved who stated in the article:

"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."

The article states how the Jewish mogul Michael Eisner, the Head of Walt Disney studios only hired "highly paid Jewish moguls" as producers such as Jeffrey Katzenberg, Michael Ovitz, Joe Roth (former head of 20th Century Fox). Medved emphazised the point that, "The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harboured anti-Semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions."

Medved continued: "Men and women of Jewish background enjoy a vastly disproportionate - if not dominate - influence in Hollywood." He added that those studios which were bought out by the Japanese Sony Corp, and by Rupert Murdoch, still had to hire, "a Yiddish team of long-time industry leaders in all the most powerful positions. When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legndary - and all-Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg and Tom Pollack."

Medved further wrote that most of today's movie moguls graduated from Ivy League colleges, "where Jews are vastly over-represented - just as they are in Hollywood." He says that nepotism plays a role exemplified with Samuel Goldwyn Pictures being run by the son of founder Samuel Goldwyn and a third generation, Tony Goldwyn, is waiting in the wings to take over. He adds: "This dynastic tendency in American entertainment certainly is a factor in the continued prominence of the Jewish role."

Medved finished the article by saying ;

"The combined weight of so many Jews in one of America's most lucrative and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a great deal of political power. They are a major source of money for Democratic candidates. The industry's informal patriarch, MCA chairman Lew Wasserman, wields tremendous personal clout in state and national politics. So do Barbara Streisand, Norman Lear and others."

Note that after winning the Democratic nomination Obama first gave a speech to AIPAC about how he will offer unconditional support to Israel' and also he began to woo Clintons backers in Hollywood such as Barbara Streisand.

The US black run website ' Black Agenda Report ' did a superb article on Obamas speech to AIPAC here ;

http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=656&Itemid=1


William A. Donohue, president of the conservative Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, has also pointed out the role of Jews in Hollywood ;

http://mediamatters.org/items/200412210001

He said " Who really cares what Hollywood thinks? All these hacks come out there. Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. It's not a secret, okay? And I'm not afraid to say it. ... ".

He also said here http://www.heebmagazine.com/articles/view/131 about the Mel Gibson move the Passion of Christ which was labelled anti-semitic ;

"Donohue has calmed down a bit. “I was expressing frustration over the pounding Catholics have taken from disproportionately Jewish studios,” he says over the phone from his New York City office. “We finally had a movie that we liked, and not only does nobody want to put it out, but we’re considered anti-Semitic because we like the movie.” If Donohue actually believed his 2004 contention, he hides it well. “Look, the problem is not Jews,” he says, widening his complaint to encompass a larger secular crowd. “But Hollywood definitely has more secular-minded Jews than Catholics or Muslims. If someone says Jews run Hollywood, how can you deny it?”


Even Mel Gibson who was widely attacked for saying Jews run Hollywoood was forced to recant on bended knee for his heresy of saying what everyone knows but that everyone is usually afraid to say which is that ' the Jews run Hollywood'.

Even Haaretx says this in its article here - http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=690808&contrassID=2

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, who is Jewish ran the company from 1984-2005. The Disney empire, was headed by a man described by one media analyst as "a control freak," included several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies.

Eisner was so despised by his own board for the way he ran Disney, that the board set up a 'Save Disney Campaign'. On March 4, 2004, Disney's board of directors, on which Mitchell had served since 1995, named him Michael Eisner's replacement as Chairman of the Board after 43% of the company's shares were voted against Eisner's reelection. Mitchell himself received a 25% negative vote, a fact that led dissident Disney shareholders Roy E. Disney and Stanley Gold to criticize the appointment of Mitchell, whom they saw as Eisner's puppet. On June 28, 2006, Disney announced that its board had elected one of its members, John Pepper, Jr., former CEO of Procter and Gamble, to replace Mitchell as chairman effective January 1, 2007.


As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies such as The Crying Game, Priests, and Kids.

The Group in its current form was initiated in 1998 by then Studio Chairman Joe Roth in order to centralize the various production units and to make live-action film production within Disney more cost-efficient. The President of the Group is Oren Aviv, who reports to Dick Cook, Chairman of the Walt Disney Studios. Cook, in turn, reports to Robert (Bob) Iger, President/CEO of The Walt Disney Company. Oren Aviv is also Jewish I believe.


When the Disney Company was run by the Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner the company had expanded into the production of graphic sex and gratuitous violence. In addition to TV and movies, the corporation owns Disneyland, Disney World, Epcot Center, Tokyo Disneyland, and Euro Disney.

Time Warner, Inc., is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald M. Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network.

Viacom, Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing.

Sumner Murray Redstone (born Sumner Murray Rothstein; May 27, 1923) is majority owner and Chairman of the Board of the National Amusements theater chain. Through National Amusements, Sumner Redstone and his family are majority owners of CBS Corporation, Viacom, and Midway Games, MTV Networks, BET, and movie production and distribution Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks movie studios, and are equal partners in MovieTickets.com.

Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.

Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience.

Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television Network and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chernin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew.

Peter Chernin (born May 29, 1951 in Harrison, New York) is President and Chief Operating Officer of News Corporation, and Chairman and CEO of the Fox Group. In addition to the Fox duties, he is also a Corporate Director for American Express.

Widely considered one of the most powerful media executives in the world, Chernin has been credited in particular with the success of Fox's cable operations. Prior to joining Fox, Chernin was president and COO of Lorimar Film Entertainment. His other executive roles include positions at Showtime/The Movie Channel, Warner Books and St. Martin's Press.

For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as "the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States," is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also owns Revlon cosmetics.

In 1989, Perelman went back and bought New World Entertainment, the former parent company of Marvel, and then Four Star International. In 1993, Perelman acquired three major entities: SCI Television for $120 million plus $730 million in assumed debt, with seven television stations included in the deal; Genesis Entertainment, and Guthy-Renker. In late 1993, he reorgnanized all of the above-mentioned companies into a single corporation called New World Communications. In 1994, Perelman bought four more stations from the Great American Communications Company for $360 million and four more from Argyle Television Holdings for $716 million. His purchases set the stage for the Fox affiliate switches of 1994 in which Ronald Perelman rewrote the rules for how television affiliates operated and helped establish Fox as a force to be reckoned with. Naturally, Ronald took home a tidy profit: In two deals in 1994 and 1996, Rupert Murdoch bought complete control of New World Communications for $3 billion.

The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film direction Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks may soon be in the same league as the big three.

Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman, Jr., who was also president of the World Jewish Congress.

Of course the issue of the owneship of the major studios in Hollywood is irrelevant as long as those that make the movies are not abusing their powers to undermine or attack other communities, but this is not the case.

In recent years we have seen how the Hollywood demonisation process, which was once obsessed with the stereotypical Blonde Nazi German, has now shifed to creating new
steretypes for a new century.

Now it is the English and the Russians that appear to be the new enemies that Hollywood wants to pimp out to the masses.

I contend that Hollywood has now gone beyond entertainment and is nor producing propaganda, which is designed for one reason which is to undermine the group solidarity of those social groups that some section of the Jewish community in the US conceive as a threat to themselves and their community.

This includes Anglo-Americans, Catholics, Ethno-centric Black organisations and other ethno-comunity structures that could organise to undermine the power of the existing lobby groups and community groups that dominate American politics and American society.

No doubt I shall expect another avalanche of death threats from the CST and other thugs for daring to debate an issue that appears to be 'taboo'.

It is not anti-semitic to point out that a specific section of the US society is dominated by one ethnic or racal group, as many sections of American society are dominated by ethnic and racial groups of all kinds.

It is an abuse of the right to define anything as anti-semitic when the aim is to silence legitimate debate on an issue, and such Marxist-Leninist Terrorism of the Word must be resisted.

Democracy depends on free debate, tyranny begins when censorship begins.

It is perverse is it not that in an era when Hollywood pumps out pornography, glorifies drug abuse, sexualises children, peddles violence in its movies, glorifies guns, war and horror and churns out endless torture porn movies as entertainment - Hollywood itself seeks to censor all those want to investigate what it is doing and who is running it ?

Isnt that the ultimate hypocrisy ?

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

but what is not acceptable is when those groups use their power in any society to undermine, usurp, weaken and attack other communities or to undermine the community interests of other communities.--DOL

It should be noted that many people would apply the above characteristic to the BNP.

Defender of Liberty said...

Some would apply those characteristics to the BNP, but tht is primarily due to the fact they are woefully ignorant as to what the BNP stands for.

Those that allow the media to do their thinking for them are usually the most loud mouthed, but close minded in our society.

Living in America Lolmarie, have you ever met a member of the BNP ?

Or have you merely believed what the media TELL YOU about the BNP ?

You are an intelligent woman, but even you let others in the media do your thinking for you.

Isnt that a form of the mental slavery we were debating on another thread ?

Anonymous said...

LorMarie claims that the BNP uses oower to weaken, attack, usurp or attack other groups in society.

How can this be when the BNP are not in power - and never have been in power? They don't even control one local council so her argument is weak and facile.

I would suggest that people like LorMaire would not claim the same against other ethnic groups or indigenous communities who are struggling against oppression. Would she say the same against Amerindian tribes I ewonder, or the plight of Amazonian tribes under attack from oppression and land-seixures?

I think not.

Hence the facile nature of the internationalists, the "death by media brain washing" crowd who lack the ability to think for themselves.

Defender of Liberty said...

It gets even more blatant.

In the new Incredible Hulk movie Tim Roth plays a Russian born man raised in England who becomes the evil being called The Beast.

I kid you not - the Hulk movie has created an Russian /English hybrid - the ultimate movie evil for Hollywood, a Russian born bad guy with an English accent.

Note also the taxi driver in the movie who Liv Tyler screams at is also , wait for it, wait for it, A RUSSIAN !

How about we list all the english bad guys such as Ian Mckellan as Magneto in the X men etc etc.

EVEN PETER BRADSHAW OF THE GUARDIAN IN HIS REVIEW OF THE INCREDIBLE HULK MOVIE TALKS ABOUT HOW ANNOYED HE IS AT THE HOLLYWOOD BRIT STEREOPTYPING OF TIM ROTH AS THE BAD GUY !

Anonymous said...

I don't think that my other comment went through so I'll repost...

It would be unfair to assume that I am allowing the media to do my thinking for me simply because you do not agree with my position. I am a regular listener of a black British journalist and radio personality on WBAI. She went on and on about the BNP, I became curious and decided to have a look at the website. That is how I reached my conclusion and discovered a link to your blog.

Mr. Potter,

While there may be some legitimate concerns, the "indigenous" population of Britain is in no way shape or form oppressed.

Far be it from me to turn this thread into something other than what was intended. I'll leave you all to discussing the "Jewish Elite" as you put it.

Anonymous said...

@Lormarie

The BNP are stating facts, not spreading propaganda. Everything they say can easily be verified.

I don't know about you but i would be inclined to call political correctness, enforced multiculturalism and dispossession of their culture/heritage/land a form of oppression. Not as blatant as physical oppression but i would still classify it as such.

Anonymous said...

Do my posts get through to you or are you simply not publishing them for some reason?

I posted here last night.

Anonymous said...

You tell us of the dire situation as it exists in Hollywood these days, but you offer the reader no solution to this slick, sleazy quagmire inundating Hollywood.

What you say in your article is certainly true. You speak the facts. My only solace to all this is that Michael Eisner, the purveyor of sleaze and the "fast-buck," that fox that guarded over the henhouse, is no longer CEO of Disney. Thanks primarily to the efforts of Mr. Roy E. Disney, a man of honour and high moral standing, Eisner was removed. About time this! I have read that Eisner scoffed at allowing Disney employees a one dollar an hour raise in salary, while he looted the Disney franchise of one billion USD. A scoundrel and criminal he. But what about the rest of the rat's nest?

DBE

Anonymous said...

You tell us of the dire situation as it exists in Hollywood these days, but you offer the reader no solution to this slick, sleazy quagmire inundating Hollywood.

What you write in your article is certainly true. You speak the indisputable facts. My only solace is that Michael Eisner, that purveyor of sleaze and the "fast-buck," that sly, conniving fox who presided over the Disney henhouse, is no longer CEO. Thanks belongs primarily to the efforts of Mr. Roy E. Disney, a man of honour and high moral standing, who had Eisner removed. About time I say! Do you know I have read Michael Eisner scoffed at allowing Disney employees a one dollar an hour raise in salary, whilst he looted the Disney franchise of one billion USD? A scoundrel and criminal he. But what shall be done about the rest of the rat's nest?

DBE