Saturday 13 December 2008

Obama - An American Gangster

Every day it appears that more and more dirt is being dug up on Obama.

From the ongoing issue of his citizenship, and therefore his validity to be appointed to the position of US president to the ongoing scandal of Governor Rod Blagojevich, which it now appears that Emmanuel Rahm, Obamas Chief of Staff, was acting as an intermediary between Blagojevich and Obama, Obama is now being revealed as either a crook or an incompetent idiot before he even gets to sit in the White house and build his baseball court.

These are scandals of an epic proportion.

Add to them the other list of issues such as ;

Obama is not a natural born citizen and is ineligible to be

Obama in his official capacity as IL State Senator and US
Senator has committed High Crimes and Misdemeanors on multiple

Obama lied on his IL Bar Application.

Obama has a very suspect Selective Service Application.

Obama has been involved in illegal and corrupt dealings with
the following indicted and/or convicted IL officials and

Tony Rezko
Stuart Levine
Dr. Robert Weinstein
Governor Rod Blagojevich

Then it appears that America has elected the biggest Chicago gangster to power since Al Capone.

Electing a Chicago politician to power was idiotic.

Chicago is the most corrupt state in America where 4 0f the last 8 governors have been thrown into jail from criminality.

Obama is as dirty as the rest of the gangsters that infest Chicago.

But America voted for him as most Americans are simply media conditioned dumb drones.

White Americans, especially the sickening soccer mom middle class idiots, have been conditioned by the media with a guilt reflex to vote for anyone simply because they are not white - whilst the blacks in America have become the most racist group in US history who now only vote for blacks.

If the legacy of the civil rights struggle is the creation of a racist black community who will vote for a crook just because he is black and a white community so riddled with fake conditioned guilt that it vote for any ethnic just because they are not white - then America deserves nothing but contempt.

Americans believe what they are told by the media.

America would vote for anyone they are told to vote for by the liberal media cabals that control the US media.

The corrupt media elects a corrupt politician to power.

That is not a democracy, that is a joke.

In the midst of the worst depression for 80 years, whilst America is fighting two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - the lemmings of the US public vote in the biggest gangster in US history.

The ongoing racial cold war in America by blacks against whites, where the racist crime wave of black against white racist crime is hidden by the media or defined by the government simply as crime - will now become a true racial war.

I predict a racial civil war will break out in America.

The Second American Civil War is going to be a race war.

And because of the election of the American Gangster to power its will be coming along soon.

When the black realise that Obama is not going to give them the money they want, and when whites realise that Obama is not going to stop the racist crime wave that will start to be inflicted upon them as the blacks realise that Obama aint gonna give them the dollars they want - then the race war will begin.

Add to Technorati Favorites


Anonymous said...

I predict a racial civil war will break out in America.--DOL

That can never happen. Why? Who controls the police force, military, etc in America? Whites do. Any type of war will not be a fair fight since blacks do not have that much power in the US. There may be a half black president, but that means nothing. Sad to say, he will have to be on better than his best behavior because he's black. If he upsets the country too much, he'll be impeached. My point is, there can be no race war as far as blacks and whites are concerned. NOT because of some overwhelming love, but because one side has much more power than the other. If we put a 6'4" black belt against a 5'ft 100 pound weakling, would that really be a fight?

Anonymous said...

A non-White PM... 'Coming soon to Blighty' unless our people get off the sofa.

alanorei said...

Barack Hussein Obama is the most authentic 'type' of the final antichrist to appear on the world stage yet.

Re: non-White PM, well, the last two have been non-White in all but race only.

Re: second Civil War, one side did get devastated in the first one. One (White) Baptist minister in the US indicated that such a result could indeed be the hidden agenda in any stand-off between race in the US.

I think the possibility should be checked.

Anonymous said...

Lormarie: [Civil war - "That can never happen. Why? Who controls the police force, military, etc in America? Whites do."] But the different sides are not defined exclusively by race: deracinated liberal white traitors augment the black side, and are in fact the greater danger. Without them, blacks would never succeed in stealing what does not belong to them and bringing down civilisation.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

(I am assuming Lormarie is a female - does that make me a sexist?) Anyway, Lormarie says her normal line like the pre-programmed drone she is:

"That can never happen. Why? Who controls the police force, military, etc in America? Whites do."

The ethnicity of the ruling elite means nothing, it is their political agenda which counts... therefore you will find, as it happening across Europe, white politicians have been elected into power who in fact despise their own race (it is called ethnic self-loathing), so even though whites are in power they are devastating the indigenous white populations with their globalist agenda, specifically using mass immigration as their monolithic steam-roller with which to crush millenia of traditions and cultures.

You are obsessed with race, just because someone is white does not automatically mean they will operate for the benefit of the white race ... I know this is a concept too great for you to comprehend, being as all your arguments hinge on this crucial but incorrect fact - that's why you need to keep trotting it out, because it underpins all your thinking and I don't expect you have the mental capacity to actually challenge this embedded belief. In fact the more you keep trotting out this line of illogical reasoning tells me more about your own prejudices and mental state that what you are actually writing about.

Grow up will you, and get over this ridiculous concept that "whites have all the power therefore blah, blah, blah..." it's like some political get out of jail free card that you use, i.e. that politician is white therefore he is effectively racist - that's what you are saying ... speak to any nationalist and they will tell you that the white politicians in power do not represent them or the indigenous white races of Europe.

Us nationalists can see beyond skin colour and critique political theory and reality, you however, take a look at the skin colour of a politician and that's as far as your analysis gets... they are white therefore... you can guess the rest.

Stop haunting this blog with your inane and pathetically misguided rantings, you are a typical, mentally retarded leftist tool. Oh dear, I am mean today aren't I? I don't even know what skin colour you are and I have managed to make that statement... but I can tell you that you skin colour is irrelevant, you are a fuck-wit nonetheless. Now go and get plugged into the establishment direct feed you have and receive the latest politically correct updates... and at least give us some new piece of bullshit to rip apart.

alanorei said...

Andastre, you make some strong and fair points in dissenting from Lormarie but I don't think discourtesy is called for - not really in the right spirit of blogging, I suggest.

Re: a US race war, the main incentives are the apparent favouritism that the US administration shows to the non-white and Hispanic population and the increasing resentment of the whites as a result. The following is from the e-group of US Baptist researcher Eric Jon Phelps, issued July 8, 2008. The details of the LA Times issue are not given but could probably be obtained by searching the paper's website.

It is possible, even probable, that the social and racial tensions arising from situations like that below, in areas of high BME presence, could eventually result in these areas becoming war zones.

From the L. A. Times

1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County (L. A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants working without a green card.

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.

3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.

4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal , whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally

6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.

8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD (Housing and Urban Development) properties are illegal.

9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking.

10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish. (There are 10.2 million people in L. A. County.)

(All 10 of the above are from the Los Angeles Times)

Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.

Over 70% of the United States' annual population growth (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York) results from immigration.

29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.

We are a bunch of fools for letting this continue


Send copies of this letter to at least two other people; 100 would be even better.

This is only one State...............If this doesn't open your eyes
nothing will! and you wonder why Pelosi* wants them to become voters.

*Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the US House of Representatives and very pro-immigration. She was/is also Congresswoman for California's 8th District, which is most of the racially disparate city of San Francisco, and Democrat Party Leader for the House of Representatives. Clearly not someone who would appeal to white, conservative, right-wing Americans.

Anonymous said...

@ alanorei

You are totally right, I should not have resorted to name calling... but (and there's always a but) there is only some much I can take of someone continuing peddle the same garbage. In fact I find it a discourtesy that she has come onto this blog and keeps trotting out the same line ... "whites in power" ad nauseam.

How many times does the same point have to be explained to her that just because someone is white does not mean they will operate for the bests interests of white people... i.e. as in the case of the governments of the EU and the US.

Anonymous said...


I'll sum up my other reply that didn't make the cut. Judging from this response and your other responses (to me), you:

1- Can't handle an adult conversation

2- Express the same catty trait that I find common among teenage girls

3- Have little understanding of race in America (look again at your comment on white liberals).

Consider yourself ignored.


Concerns over immigration aren't limited to white conservatives.

But back to the point. The concept of a race war assumes that both sides are equipped to fight such a war. It also assumes that both sides are unified enough to be willing to fight. Intra-racial hatred exists among blacks, I believe, to such a point that a unified front is impossible.

Unity or not, blacks cannot fight or win a race war.

Anonymous said...

Lormarie ...

Ignored or not by you makes no difference - as I will challenge your posts - not very difficult as you only have one line anyway: "whites in power this"... "whites in power that".

Despite the invective of previous post the points remain entirely consistent and absolutely destroy your "whites in power" mantra... I would guess you would not want to attempt to argue with my points anyway, so it is rather convenient for you to be given a get out.

And don't think you have got some moral high ground... as anyone from UAF automatically operates from an unprincipled and immoral position - just look at the behaviour of the UAF, like some rabid, labotomised, Pavlovian attack dogs conditioned by the establishment.

So as regards the comments about having an adult conversation, etc, I suggest you take a look at how the UAF operates generally before you come out with such grotesque hypocrisy that makes your moralising pathetic and empty.

Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!

alanorei said...


Re: concerns over immigration, it is nevertheless a major concern of white Americans, whoever else may be concerned. That is the main issue.

Re: race war. The sides don't have to be evenly matched to start a war. The strategy becomes one of asymmetric warfare, as Lee has described in some earlier articles. An early but important work on this subject is The War of The Flea by Robert Tabor*.

*Maybe Tabor had in mind David and Goliath, 1 Samuel 17:50, 24:14.

It can be very effective. In the early 70s, the UK had about 20,000 troops tied down in Ulster in a largely urban guerrilla war that the other side eventually won. A British Army captain, who'd served in the Province, told me that the IRA at the time had "a hard core of about two hundred."

Victory at odds of 100:1 against isn't bad going, by any standard.

Neither side has to be completely unified for a war to go ahead. They simply need enough devotees willing to do the business - and if necessary (e.g. West Belfast during 'the troubles') to intimidate the rest into keeping their heads down.

Moreover, black insurgents most likely aren't the main concern of the US authorities. The FBI reckons that the notorious MS-13 gangs, largely Hispanic but with links to both black and Islamicist organisations, are the country's most dangerous gangs. These cohorts are armed, very dangerous and ready to do the business - of urbanised guerrilla warfare. They operate in 33 states of the USA and have spread rapidly.


Your analysis of the white 5th column is of course correct. This thesis was explored in detail by American researcher Wilmot Robertson about 30 years ago in his 600+ page work The Dispossessed Majority - more evidence of the effectiveness of asymmetric warfare, though in a different context.

The US is paying dearly for ignoring Robertson's anayses. So will the UK (and already is).

Anonymous said...

Low-level race conflict already exists, just we don't know much about it because it is covered up by establishment goons and not reported, at at best distorted, by the puppet media...

I.e. most racist attacks are against whites, not perpetrated by them... a fact which the establishment and retards in the UAF try to deny by some bizarre inversion of thinking that only whites can be racist... wait 'til Lormarie replies... she will say only whites can be racist because... that's right you guessed it... whites are in power! So, if we go to Africa and start attacking blacks (not that we would) then by her logic we cannot therefore be racist because blacks are in power... however (as demonstrated previously) she doesn't answer this, instead comes out with some convoluted drivel which may work with her UAF f-buddies, but doesn't stand up in reality.

Evidence of civil war in our country:

4,760 reports of suspected terrorism in Derbyshire this year, of which 584 were considered serious enough to be investigated by the police’s counter-terrorism team.

alanorei said...

Yes, Derbyshire of all places, not east London - bizarre, though it's near remote areas where Islamicists could be in training.

Racism Cuts Both Ways is further evidence of the disproportionate racial violence perpetrated against the host population of these isles.

Naturally, all the usual suspects, e.g. Cruddas et al. have emerged in denial mode. As Simon Darby's blog reveals.

Anonymous said...

Wake people everything must do a complete life cycle, 360 degrees.

We have begun are final cycle by power shifting back to where it started, in the Black Man's hands. For the not so bright the world started with powerful BLACK Kings who ran the world.

There is nothing to be done about the future. It is the cycle of life.

Further more Barack isn't the anichrist. Look at the Pope he carries ALL of the markings of the beast. His title adds to 666. The numbers in his crown 666 ect. Do some research.

alanorei said...

Re: Further more Barack isn't the anichrist. Look at the Pope he carries ALL of the markings of the beast. His title adds to 666. The numbers in his crown 666 ect. Do some research.

I didn't say BO was the antichrist. I said he was a type of the antichrist.

Read the complete post before sounding off.

The present pope does not carry all the markings of the beast.

Read Revelation 13, KJB.

The research on VICARIVS FILII DEI was done back in the 19th century by Moody, Spurgeon and others, so that the then college of cardinals decided to shelve the title.

This does not detract from BO's foreshadowing of this individual, however. His mixed racial and religious background is a distinct feature of the beast. No pope, including the present one, has manifested these features as BO does.

You really need to improve your own research into the topic somewhat.