Monday 29 December 2008
Valkyrie And The Last Great Taboo
Have you ever wondered why it is that Hollywood churns out endless films about the Holocaust, endless films and documentaries about Hitler and the Nazis and endless films about World War Two filled with evil blonde Nazis strutting around in SS uniforms shooting innocent Jews - but why a film like Valkyrie by Tom Cruise which addressed the issue of German resistance to Hitler was so viciously attacked by Hollywood, media critics and film critics - EVEN BEFORE IT WAS RELEASED !!! ?
Hollywood, as is well known, is run primarily by Jews. All of the major studio heads are Jewish. If all the major studio heads were Bantu Pygmys then we could, and would say that Hollywood is run by Bantu Pygmys.
But there are no Bantu Pygmy studio heads in Hollywood.
There is of course nothing wrong with the fact that Hollywood is run primarily by Jews, but the fact is that those Jews in Hollywood have a vested interest in constantly reinforcing the idea that the Holocaust was a unique evil in human history.
It wasnt of course as the genocide of the Armenians, the massacres by Tamerlaine, the Killing Fields of Pol Pot, the Soviet Holocaust and the black on black genocide of Rwanda all demonstrate that the planned systematic slaughter of millions of people for a variety of reasons is something that permeates all of human history.
The reason why the Holocaust is so well known, and so well propagandised, is simply because the Jews in Hollywood and the Liberal Left politicians in the West all see the issue of the Holocaust as useful politically and communally to them - the Jews in America use the Holocaust to consolidate their power over the political, economic and media systems and to inculcate guilt in Europeans and Christians for the crime of the Holocaust and the Liberal left elite use the Holocaust as a way to attack Nationalism, nationalist politics and anything that dares stand against their politically correct multi-cultural society. Anything that is against political correctness and multi-culturalism can therefore be equated with 'nazism'.
In order for this conditioning trick to work then the Holocaust must be 'resold' to every generation via movies, books and popular culture in order to condition them into regarding Nationalism = Nazis = Holocaust.
This is why every few years a remake of the same stories are made, such as the Anne Frank story or a new Schindlers List or the Boy In The Striped Pyjamas or The Pianist etc etc.
Every generation gets sold their own Holocaust - and each time with better special effects and made more horrific in order to burn the event in the psyche of both Jews and non-Jews.
The recent attacks on the film Valkyrie directed by Tom Cruise that was denigrated by critics was attacked primarily on two grounds - first that Cruise as a Scientologist was somehow 'sinister' and also that the film was wrong as it portrayed what has become known as the 'good nazis' - those who were against Hitler.
Scientology is a threat to many powerful Jews in Hollywood as it is popular with many Jewish and non-Jewish people who are choosing to reject their Jewish racial and religious background, and Christian backgrounds, and adopt Scientology as a religion - which thereby weakens the hold the Jewish elite have on Hollywood.
Tom Cruise and the scientologists are the rising power elite in Hollywood who threaten the Jewish elites power grip over the film making, and hence conditioning, process.
Thereby the media demonises scientologists as a cult.
The other issue is lot deeper than simple power politics.
The very notion of the 'Good Nazi' brings with it the obverse, that of the Jews who through their actions facilitated the rise of the Nazis to power in pre-war Germany.
Simply put - the whole focus on history has been solely on German culpability for Hitler and not ever Jewish responsibility for the rise of anti-semitism in pre-war Germany and how their actions as individuals and a community assisted the rise of the Nazis to power.
The staple of the majority of Hollywood films, and hence conditioning, over the last 70 years since the end of the nazi regime is that ALL Germans were Nazis and hence all germans were evil. This perception of unique German evil was essential in order to ensure that the idea that any Jews in pre-war Germany, who may have been somehow also responsible for the rise of Hitler, could never even be regarded as existing.
If all germans were evil nazis then this meant that the Jews of Germany were absolved from any role in the rise of Hitler.
This was always utter rubbish - as shown by the many germans who fought against Hitler, housed Jewish refugees, who died in Concentration camps and who died organising attacks on Hitler.
The idea that all germans were bad nazis is a calumny that has been accepted only because people have been cowed into silence by the media.
The issue of Jewish responsibility for the rise of Hitler has NEVER been debated, spoken about or even addressed - let alone in a movie !
Valkyrie, the movie, challenges the great myth that all Germans were Nazis, all German were evil and therefore opens the door to the other issue - that not all Jews were simply 'victims' of the Germans and also what exactly was their role in the atmosphere of the times that generated such anti-semitism in German society and therefore that led to the rise of the Nazis.
One of the issues that dare not ever be debated is simply this - every year we see another legal claim for billions of dollars worth of reparations for artworks stolen by the nazis from german jews, land stolen by the nazis from the german jews, money stolen by the nazis from the german jews etc etc - yet no-one ever asks the questions - how was it that a minority of Jews in pre-nazi Germany managed to accumulate such vast wealth.
The question that goes along with this must also be - what effect did it have on poor, mainly working class Germans who suffered in the Great Depression who saw this tiny community with such massive wealth, power and privilege ?
It is this issue, and the many associated issues such as ;
1) How did the Jewish community in pre-Nazi Germany accrue such wealth, power and privilege in pre-nazi germany ?
2) How did ordinary Germans regard the wealth and power of the Jews in Germany ?
3) How did the Jews use their wealth, power and privilege in pre-nazi Germany ?
4) Was anti-semitism the cause of the rise of Nazism, or was Nazism the cause of the rise of anti-semitism ?
5) How aware were ordinary Germans as to the wealth and power of Jews in pre-nazi germany and how did this affct both their perceptions of the Jews and their feelings toward Nazism and Hitler ?
These are issues that Hollywood has barely addressed. The film Max, with John Cusak, where Hitler is shown as a poverty stricken artist jealous of the wealth and talent of Max, a wealthy Jewish art gallery owner, touched on the issue but never explored it - instead it was once again the issue of simple jealousy that was used as the motivation for Hitlers anti-semitism.
Yet the question - how did Max and his family accrue such wealth, power and privilege in the midst of such poverty that afflicted ordinary Germans, was not addressed.
It is this question, the issue of Jewish culpability in the rise of the Nazis, that is the last great taboo.