I have to admit, that to my shame, I used to read The Times.
I go on the Times website most days and take look and over the last few weeks all we have had on it is a bunch of docile women wittering on about Obama and his wife.
You can tell that The Times is now a paper for women, simply by reading the endless infintile articles about Obamas wifes shoes, dresses, earings, hats etc etc blah blah blah yawn !
Most sickening of all was that idiot Judy Finnegan and her husband Richard in The Express yesterday, displaying all the classic signs of their 'oh so earnest' liberal admiration of Obama and his wonderful, almost princess diana like wife.
Heres an article about Obama's wife that the British press wont tell you about, run as it is by idiots and journalists who are as dumb as their readers.
I wonder what the answer to the question in the article below is - usually it is because of theft or fraud.
So the first lady is either a crook or a fraudster - and yet the British press have never mentioned once why she was struck off as a lawyer.
“It is a terrible thing when you think you got on a bandwagon and it turns out to be a garbage truck." Ernst (Putzi) Hanfstaengl*
The circus out in Washington, DC., for the unlawful swearing in of the impostor president, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth, is now over. All the gushing and slobbering over the trashy looking rag worn by the militant Michelle Obama, has faded into the night. I wonder how many of the mindless mouth pieces giving their commentary about the "wonderful, smart First Lady," know that in 1993, Michelle Obama, was ordered by the Illinois Supreme Court to stop practicing law? The faux First Lady was ordered by the court; it was not her choice.
The records are sealed by the court so we don't know why, but I am told by lawyers sending me email, it had to be something major for such drastic action.
Sunday, 25 January 2009
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I was watching the news on the BBC and up it pops on the screen, 'Day 4 Obama', good grief, are we to expect 'Day 730 Obama' in two years time.
If people can't see through this farce, then they don't deserve eyes.
LOL, be careful or we're going to have to call you out over at Michelle Obama Watch.
Regarding "princess Michelle," I personally refrain from any comparisons of Michelle Obama and anyone else since she's one of a kind. The title of first lady is also too important to ignore in favor or princess or queen (whether Laura Bush, Hilary Clinton, or Michelle Obama). But that's just me. I'm also not ashamed to admit that Michelle Obama played a part (ALBEIT SMALL) in my vote for Obama. It's to the point that even if Obama fails as president, I hope the First Lady makes a positive mark on the US (for obvious reasons).
Whatever the case, there have been so many things that the right in the US has threatened to use against Michelle Obama (thesis, release of videos, etc.). Now this. They'll try anything I guess. It never pans out though.
Omg, your post is linked on their sidebar. I should do a write up later.
ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2008 at 10:54:43 AM:
Full Licensed Name: Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s): Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer
by Illinois Supreme Court: May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address: Not available online
Registered Business Phone: Not available online
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 1993
"Voluntarily inactive" is the status assigned to a lawyer who chooses not to renew his/her license. The above is public record, btw.
I WAS SO BUSY LAUGHING AT THE NUDE PICTURES OF OBAMA'S MOMMA THAT I PRESSED THE BLOODY DELETE BUTTON ON YOUR COMMENTS BY ACCIDENT - CAN YOU PLEASE POST THE LINK AGAIN ABOUT THE OBAMA WATCH SITE AND I WILL POST THEM UP HERE - THANKS.
I'm afraid I don't share your interest in porn but my post is at MichelleObabaWatch.com
Hi cynthia ( you know you are not anonymous ),
I betcha if old Obama got his one eyed trouser snake out for a Playgirl centrefold shoot I bet you would the first in the queue, panting like a sheepdog on a hot summers afternoon, to buy it.
Stop being so coy.
You know you would.
That last comment was from me informing you where my post about you is located
I know that you would not look at any pictures of Obama in the noodie.
But I betcha thought he looked a hottie walking along the beach in just his swimming trunks though didntcha when they were in the papers a few weeks ago !
Wasnt it lucky that a photographer just happened to be there to catch him with his top off walking in the surf showing his torso off.
Tell cynthia I think she is great.
Her comment about me being the Rush Limbaugh of Britain' has made my day.
I betcha though she would look at Obama in the noodie if he ever did a playgirl centrefold.
Actually, I thought he looked like he had tits so the pic was a complete turn off. Overall, he's not my type. Did you check out the link arguing against accusations of fraud?
Frankly….There is no “black and white”. Sorry, but the saying fits.
Some people care about clothes and want to hear about the first ladies’ fashion choices. (me)
Some people find it inane (my fiancee).
Some people hold themselves to a standard of beauty that the media portrays, some don’t. Individuals choose their standard of beauty. For me, having a brown skinned woman be a standard of beauty at ALL is a step forward from my childhood.
Most partners in an equal relationship have sway with their spouses. Some have more than others, some have less. Even within partnerships, there are somethings that I will want my fiancee’s oppinion on, (cooking, good books, music), and other things I don’t (decor, fixing my car, clothes). That depends on the couple. There is no way to know outside of the partnership.
How are any of these things ANY different than when any other president was in the White House. Rarely are things either or.
One person has to be the “bitch” and the other the “butch”? What relationship standard is that?
Either someone is a “good role model” or they aren’t? People are human, and imperfect.
Either a wife completely influences her husband, or her husband is completely impartial? I doubt that.
Sorry, but your logic is a bit faulty.
Post a Comment