I have to admit, that to my shame, I used to read The Times.
I go on the Times website most days and take look and over the last few weeks all we have had on it is a bunch of docile women wittering on about Obama and his wife.
You can tell that The Times is now a paper for women, simply by reading the endless infintile articles about Obamas wifes shoes, dresses, earings, hats etc etc blah blah blah yawn !
Most sickening of all was that idiot Judy Finnegan and her husband Richard in The Express yesterday, displaying all the classic signs of their 'oh so earnest' liberal admiration of Obama and his wonderful, almost princess diana like wife.
Heres an article about Obama's wife that the British press wont tell you about, run as it is by idiots and journalists who are as dumb as their readers.
I wonder what the answer to the question in the article below is - usually it is because of theft or fraud.
So the first lady is either a crook or a fraudster - and yet the British press have never mentioned once why she was struck off as a lawyer.
“It is a terrible thing when you think you got on a bandwagon and it turns out to be a garbage truck." Ernst (Putzi) Hanfstaengl*
The circus out in Washington, DC., for the unlawful swearing in of the impostor president, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth, is now over. All the gushing and slobbering over the trashy looking rag worn by the militant Michelle Obama, has faded into the night. I wonder how many of the mindless mouth pieces giving their commentary about the "wonderful, smart First Lady," know that in 1993, Michelle Obama, was ordered by the Illinois Supreme Court to stop practicing law? The faux First Lady was ordered by the court; it was not her choice.
The records are sealed by the court so we don't know why, but I am told by lawyers sending me email, it had to be something major for such drastic action.