Sunday 30 November 2008


The day before I was on The Moral Maze I gave an half an hour interview with a Radio 4 journalist on the issue of the BNP membership list being leaked.

I attended a radio studio in Chatham, Kent and then had an interview with a chap from Radio 4.

In that interview I was asked questions and allowed to answer them without being stopped, my words twisted and without people trying to set up a lynching party.

I was told that the interview would be on Radio 4 on Tuesday last week - yet it did not appear.

Why ?

Is it because the BBC will only publish the propaganda they want about the BNP - and therefore any interview we give that undermines their propaganda must be thrown into the Memory Hole ?

Here is my latest comment on the Moral Maze website here ;

1) I reiterate the point made previously ;

If the BNP are so thick why was it required for the Moral Maze show to have every guest with an anti-BNP bias on the show ?

Why was it neccasery for the endless stream of abuse and bile to be aired by the panelists about the BNP before the show even began.

If that panel on the show were an internal BBC disciplinary panel as relating to the behaviour of an an BBC employee - then the bias, abuse and bullying would leave the BBC open to a charge of victimisation, bias and bullying in an employment tribunal.

There was not even a pretence of fairness, equality and respect - the attacks on the BNP began before I even walked into the studio.

That is called bullying - yet some of the people on this thread think that someone defending themselves from such bullying and abuse is somehow wrong - what hypocrisy from these people !

The day before The Moral Maze I gave an hour long radio interview for Radio 4 that was supposed to be broadcast on the Tuesday night.

In that interview it was just me and the interviewer having a conversation and debate.

I was asked questions and given the time to respond without interruprtion or abuse.

Note that this show was not broadcast.

It appears that a fair debate is not acceptable as regards the BNP but demonisation and lie are - I call that cowardice.

If the BNP is so thick why not have a fair debate where it is a one on one interview where questions are asked and the interviewer gives the person the respect and time to respond.

It appears that the BBC does not have the intellectual ability to debate with the BNP - as shown also by Nick Griffins mauling of Jeremy Paxman a few years ago on Newsnight, and therefore can only set up a public lynching party with a pack of bushwhackers.

Come on BBC - if the BNP are so thick then why not have a fair debate ?

Or is it simply that the BBC know their propaganda about the BNP is simply that PROPAGANDA - and therefore for the truth to come out would somehow undermine the image and trust that the people have in the BBC iself.

The BBC have a duty to be politically impartial - yet we all know this is a joke.

The fact that the BBC has peddled myths about the BNP for so long eg knuckledraggers, thugs, thick, despised etc etc means that that truth being revealed would reveal more about the BBC than the BNP.

Therefore the BBC cannot offer a fair debate to the BNP as to do would reveal the fact that the BBC is guilty of lies, propaganda and deceits to the British public about the BNP.

The BBC has gone too far down the road of propaganda and lies for it to be revealed - as then the public would be very very angry at how much they have been manipulated by the BBC.

Add to Technorati Favorites


Anonymous said...

Well said Lee.

If the BNP really are that bad then get Nick on Question Time and let the nation have a good laugh at a retarded, knuckle-dragging, racist nazi so they can finish the BNP once and for all.

That is all it would take yet the BBC and the cowards masquerading as politicians haven't got a pair of bollocks between them to take Griffin on.

We all know why.



Bert Rustle said...

Presumably you recorded the discussion yourself. Did not Nick Griffin actually video a TV interview once?

Who was the interviewer? Which program was it for?

Anonymous said...

You obviously gave the wrong answers to their questions Lee!

Anonymous said...

Do you have a copy of the interview?

If not perhaps it should be BNP policy to either demand an unedited copy or make your own.

This will:-
Provide cover for malicious editing
Give you a copy to broadcast on BNP site and protect against not airing the piece

Defender of Liberty said...

Hi folks,

you are right - from now on I will record the interview and then post it online of they do not play the interview itself.

Thanks for the tips,


Defender of Liberty said...

Hi folks,

you are right - from now on I will record the interview and then post it online of they do not play the interview itself.

Thanks for the tips,


britnhere said...

Your performance on the "Moral Maze" was superb - it was brilliant to hear the liberal, left-wing establishment taking such a verbal beating. They were comprehensively out-argued in spite of their attempts to talk over you. Their lies and insults only go to prove how totally intolerant, hypocritical and dishonest they are.

Bert Rustle said...

Melanie Philips alleged that you are of the opinion that Hollywood is run by Jews.

Joel Stein, writing in the Los(t) Angeles Times, as reported by Steve Sailer

... How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). ...

The original newspaper article contains over 100 commnts.