The BNP voting members have agreed the constitutional change.
Therefore it is now for the members to agree the changes and the constitutional changes to keep the BNP legal.
The issue is therefore - where now for the 'anti-fascists' ?
Anyone who isnt stupid enough to think the UAF, Searchlight and the Media are impartial and tell the truth about the BNP knows full well that the UAF is a front group for the Socialist Workers Party with a racist and illegal 'blacks only leadership policy' , that Searchlight is a Zionist and New Labour funded front group and the media merely serve the interests of their corporate masters and the political parties they pimp out to the masses.
For the general public, who believe their lies, the constant scream of 'racists' and 'nazis' is the primary weapon in the arsenal of the anti-BNP coalition.
But that weapon is now rendered defunct.
They cannot call the BNP 'racist' anymore as we will have many non-white members joining.
They cant call the BNP 'nazi' anymore as our new non-white members are obviously not nazis.
They cant call the BNP 'racist' anymore either as non-whites will be joining.
Therefore the whole tactics and strategy of the Far Left and the media has to change - but how ?
They havent got a clue.
And the fact is that the changes the BNP have agreed to render every attack they have used against us as useless.
Of course they can carry on lying about the BNP to the public - but seeing as No Platform has come down this lie will be easily exposed.
Not only that once the changes are in place we will be challenging the illegal bans on the BNP in the police service, prison service and the Christian Churches.
The fact that the BNP does not have any racist, illegal or discriminatory membership policies means those bans are now illegal.
They will either dump them or we will take them to court, with EU assistance, to ensure they remove those bans.
No Platform in the universities has now also been rendered illegal - and we will be getting our BNP youth sections to take on the NUS and get the universities and colleges to remove the No Platform ban - or else we will take the NUS and the colleges to court under anti-discrimination laws and the education acts that prevent political discrimination in universities and colleges.
This membership change is the equivalent of a political revolution.
The media will have to change how it reports the BNP, how it deals with the BNP and what lies it peddles about the BNP.
Though of course this will take many of the media retards time to understand this, but once we have torn them a new asshole a few times in interviews they will get the point.
The BNP have in effect just become 'mainstream'.
The entire anti-BNP coalition is right now cursing the EHRC for the case it took on against the BNP.
This is a classic case of a Phyrric Victory, a self inflicted wound.
Lancaster Unity, UAF, Hope Not Hate have in effect been shot down by the ECHR.
The far left killed its own coalition.
How beautifully ironic is that, for without the pressure from the EHRC to force the BNP to change its membership, we would never have done so.
The constitutional changes are also watertight, and the pipe dream of delusional leftists of 'entryism' are merely pathetic posturing.
Sure they can join the BNP and fund our rise to power, but the moment they cause us any internal problems we will kick them out regardless of their race, religion or nationality.
Do they honestly think we would be stupid enough to kick people out on the grounds of their race or religion - we will kick out anyone who causes us problems on the grounds of them causing us problems regardless of their race or religion.
Every new member who becomes active will be scrutinised and google searched and if we discover they are members of groups hostile to the BNP we will take their membership money and then kick them out.
As for those who are trying to cause problems for us attending BNP meetings - we have plans for that as well.
Only members will be able to attend BNP meetings - and any member who causes us any problems at meetings we will kick them out of the party for that reason.
If they want to pay their membership fee and then make some idiotic challenge to the party thats fine.
We will already have their money.
They really do underestimate us.
The fact is that the BNP has survived and prospered in spite of the entire media, political class and organised enemies of Britain attacking us for decades.
We have merely grown stronger.
Unlike other parties we are used to being attacked - and the moment the EHRC forced us to become 'mainstream' then at the same time they 'legitimised' us as a political party.
Now we have the means to go on the offensive against them - for by adhering to THEIR rules we now have the power, and the money, to force THEM to adhere to their own rules.
The rules of the game require not just us to play by the rules - but those in power as well.
Today marks a historic moment in the evolution of British Nationalism.
The ECHR cannot police peoples, souls, minds or their private opinions.
They cannot force people to abandon their principles and values - all they can do is force us to abide by their anti-discrimination laws in relation to our membership policy which is what we will do.
All they have done is to force us to play by the same political rules as the rest of the mainstream politicians.
The fact is though, that those same rules also bind them.
The impartial, bigoted and unlawfully discriminatory rules, laws and regulations that have targeted the BNP in the past are now illegal.
THE MOMENT THEY FORCED US TO BECOME LEGAL, THEY MADE THEMSELVES ILLEGAL.
They have prepared the arsenal of laws and regulations for us to use against them for every discriminatory and unlawful act they commit against us.
By forcing us to join them, they have given us the weapons we can use against them.
The laws will now have to be applied fairly to the BNP or else we will sue them every time they apply an unlawful rule, procedure or discriminatory practice against us.
We are ready and we are waiting.
Now we are going to turn their own guns back upon them.
We have captured the high ground - morally, legally and politically and the irony is that they unlocked the door to power for us and forced us to enter.
Now they will reap what they have sown.
Saturday, 14 November 2009
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Now let's go after the liblabconkip traitors!
While a few decent ethnics may join, there won't be a stampede - unless of course they're joining to subvert the party.
@ Unrepentant British Nationalist
There won't be masses of ethnics joining. And even if hordes of agitators joined hoping to subvert the party they will quickly find no such possibility. The only consequence of mass joining by hostiles would be to contribute to BNP funds, nothing more.
Today the BBC interviewed Nick Griffin regarding the membership change.
The video can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6gWskM038U
What I find particularly revealing about this interview is how the interviewer instantaneously shifts emphasis away from the true story of the momentous action to ballot the BNP members on the membership change and instead starts going on about the BNP member’s film of Wembley. Now this smacks of utter desperation; for surely the BBC (forever decrying the BNP for apparent “racism”) would now be focusing upon the opening up of BNP membership to ethnic minorities and how our inherently racist disposition has been dealt a mortal blow… that’s the main story is it not? Not the unofficial video of Wembley high street. However, such a change of tack by the interviewer is highly revealing – now that the tables have been turned and we have out-manoeuvred them, and this interviewer demonstrates the disquiet that now permeates the establishment and their slavish gimp, the BBC.
For one would expect the BBC to laud the establishment’s victory over the BNP. And it is the absence of relish; the lack of glee, the slathering deliberation that one would expect by such BBC reporters is patently absent. This BBC interviewer who, one would imagine, at any stage in the past would have most certainly have been masturbating fantastic at the prospect that the “odious” BNP would ever have to accept ethnic minorities – surely then now he would be in Nick Griffin's face drooling nuanced words of humbling defeat? Alas, no such triumphalism from the BBC… why? Because they have not been triumphant. In fact they know that the BNP have won the day – yet again. And all their Marxist wet-dreams are proving to be just that… illusory fantasies of adolescent, ingratiated minds.
The far left killed its own coalition.
One message of warning (if you will) - the FN in France has Arabs, Jews and also great support from its island regions (black supporters) and yet Jean Marie Le-Pen still gets vilified as the "most racist man in Europe"...the FN leadership is (was?) highly qualified, articulate and - for instance - Bruno Gollnisch is married to a Japanese lady and is very well-educated etc - I think there was/is a well-known and respected black singer who appears for and supports the FN etc but the media still bang on...Jean Marie may be coming to the end of his career but was kept off tv for the most part because there was NO-ONE (it seems)who could match his quick wit and humour. Just a message to keep things in proportion...
The game is up for me n' the Bruvers on the BNP Blog's.
We is Black and we av always been Black !!
Thank fuck for the policy change,the charade was getting difficult, we is feeling much better now Bruv :o)
I give you my word, every time without any exception I have been forced to change my Direction in Business, it has always and almost immediately thrust my initial apprehensions and worries into achievements beyond my wildest dreams.
For every direction you will take in life, there is success and great opportunity at the end of every road.
Great developments for sure - assuming that the BNP remains a faithful defender of British indigenous ethnicity and not promoters of miscegenation putting popularism first.
I have to ask if terms like "tear a new arsehole" are really called for. As a lady I would not use such language and would prefer that the elite of our people, male or female, would not make such revolting analogies. We should not sink to the lowest denominator but rather set an example as an elite.
I am sorry if the language offends - but I speak in the language of my community and harsh language is an essential part of that communication process.
I speak in the language of the white working class, and therefore I must communicate in a language they use and understand.
I am not a middle class or upper class communicator - Nick and others communicate to them.
My people swear, I swear - thats just the way it is.
Perhaps when we are in power we will create a classless society where each is a British Nationalist and each speaks the same higher language - until then we are as we are.
I understand what you are saying Lee, but what about sticking with good old Anglo Saxon swear words and not getting into what seems to be an ebonic/African American term referring to violent sodomy?
Don't want to start an argument or anything but the British working class also likes too much black culture - perhaps because we are so discouraged from discovering our white racially barbarian inner nature (as described by Tacitus). We are given the impression that if you are tough you emulate a gangsta savage rather than a Viking. This is also why I hate black hiphop/rap/disco/soul music played at BNP meetings. It's a role model we must reject. This must never become "British" culture.
Lee, I was thinking about this further and how my working class father and his family (protestants and I think that is relevant) almost never swore and indeed my father had to be restrained from physically attacking anyone blithely using the f word within earshot of women in his younger days. Same with the working class parent of my husband.
It really is a modern phenomenon and something the BNP must speak OUT against.
I even found this item in the Guardian explaining how the present trend in foul language is very new and is destroying our country and is not a working class tradition.
"Max Hastings is wrong to single out just middle-class values as a defence against this. In the working-class community in which I grew up 60 years ago no adult swore at home or in their social life; apart from the occasional expletive. Children who did swear would likely get a clout from a parent. There are still plenty of working-class people who do not regard swearing as acceptable.
Post a Comment