The primary responsibility of any General is to his troops.
Not to governments, politicians, the media or powerful lobby groups like AIPAC.
Therefore whilst it is the primary duty of soldiers to fight, the primary duty of all Generals is to resign if they are asked in their professional capacity to assist in the planning and execution of any mission or role that they know they do not have the equipment to undertake and that may place the lives of their troops in danger.
If they do not resign then they are complicit in the crimes of their political masters.
This was the crime of the Generals under Blair, Bush, Brown and Obama - instead of resigning they collaborated in order to advance their own careers.
There must be a New Military Covenant.
Under a nationalist government, the British Army will no longer be deployed by Parliament in order to used by foreign governments for the advancement of oil company and corporate profits.
British troops will be withdrawn from Iraq and Afghanistan.
There will be no interventionism, or Liberal Imperialism, on any grounds - except for the interests of Britain, British citizens and essential British foreign interests.
Nor will we seek to make the British Army into the social workers of the planet, turning British soldiers into global policemen.
The role of the British Army will be to protect the interests of Britain and the British people, not the political interests of political parties and their corporate sponsors in the media.
The British Miltary must undergo a Nationalist Restructuring.
Along side the traditional wings of the Military - Air, Sea, Land and Intelligence - there must be two new wings established ;
Border Defence and Assymetric Warfare.
The first of these, Border Defence, will require a new force to established that will be used to ;
1) Physically secure Britains borders
2) Secure Britains internal national security from international terrorist threats
3) Secure Britains infra-structure
The role of 1) will be the deployment of troops to secure the borders of Britain. Customs and Excise will work with the military to physically secure docks, airports and other import / export locations.
The role of 2) will be to work with the police to investigate, track and dismantle human trafficking networks and also provide assistance to the police in the removals of all illegals present in the country.
The role of 3) should be the physical securing of all Britain's essential national infrastructure.
The Border Defence Units will be Britain's Shield.
Assymetric Warfare requires a new type of military response. This will be an integrated strike force available at a moments notice to strike at essential targets globally that threaten British interests via terrorism.
This will range from the erasure of terrorist training facilities in foreign nations to the execution and targeting of senior terrorists.
Some of this will be via overt responses eg missile attacks on training camps to covert responses eg monitoring and removal of active military threats in the UK and abroad.
The Assymetric Warfare Unit will be Britain's Spear.
Whilst the traditional role of the military, to oppose and fight nation state versus nation state wars, the role of the military has now to be expanded to reflect the national security interests of the 21st century.
These are ;
WMD weapons smuggled into Britain
Therefore the British Military must evolve both strategically and tactically in order to create new operational capabilities in relation to those evolving priorities.
The securing of the Home Front is as important as securing our international interests.
The former has been neglected whilst the latter over emphasised.
Therefore resources must be deployed to shift military imperatives.
We must create a Fortress Britain at the same time as we work with our fellow European Nationalists to create a new Fortress Europe.
The Convergence of Catastrophies is now here - now we must prepare for it.
At the same time we must improve the medical care, housing and security of British soldiers in Britain.
For example - before any young unmarried British soldiers are deployed, male or female, they are given the opportunity to store semen / eggs in IVF clinics before they are sent into battle zones.
That way if they are injured they can still have children later in life or their wives have children if they died in combat.
The technology exists to do this already, but it is never done.
Wounded soldiers must be treated in specialist military hospitals, not in civilian hospitals.
There must be more support for troops suffering from PTSD and also new 'Rehab Breaks' for soldiers involved in drug and alcohol issues - the present policy of kicking out trained soldiers for smoking a spliff is idiotic.
It costs millions to train them and gain their military experience and we cannot just kick them out as a result of drug and alcohol abuse related to their service. They must be allowed periods of licensed rehabilitation and then given the opportunity to rejoin the military after treatment.
Also disabled soldiers must be given more opportunities to stay in the military, such as training, staff and teaching roles.
Instead of wasting money money on pathetic politically correct stunts like The Black Lesbian Muslim Soldiers Forum ( or whatever nonsense it is ), the money must be spent on real priorities such as improving housing, care for wounded and disabled soldiers and new equipment such as new semi-automatic machine guns that can kill the enemy.
"The Widening Gyre": Book-Review of "La convergence des catastrophes" by Guillaume Corvus
La convergence des catastrophes by Guillaume Corvus, Paris: Diffusion International, 2004, 221 Pages
Nearly three hundred years ago, the early scientistic stirrings of liberal modernity introduced the notion that life is like a clock: measurable, mechanical, and amenable to rationalist manipulation. This modernist notion sought to supplant the traditional one, which for millennia held that life is organic, cyclical, and subject to forces eluding mathematical or quantifiable expression. In this earlier view, human life was understood in terms of other life forms, being thus an endless succession of seasons, as birth, growth, decay, and death followed one another in an order conditioned by nature. That history is cyclical, that civilizations rise and fall, that the present system will be no exception to this rule -- these notions too are of ancient lineage and, though recognized by none in power, their pertinence seems to grow with each new regression of the European biosphere. With Corvus' Convergence des catastrophes, they assume again something of their former authority.
"For the first time in its history," Corvus writes, "humanity is threatened by a convergence of catastrophes." This is his way of saying that the 18th-century myth of progress -- in dismissing every tradition and value distinct to Europe -- is about to be overtaken by more primordial truths, as it becomes irrefutable evident that continued economic development creates ecological havoc; that a world system premised on short-term speculation and financial manipulation is a recipe for disaster; that beliefs in equality, individualism, and universalism are fit only for a social jungle; that multiculturalism and Third World immigration vitiate rather than re-vitalize the European homelands; that the extension of so-called republican and democratic principles suppress rather than supplant the popular will, etc. In a word, Corvus argues that the West, led by the United States, is preparing its own irreversible demise.
Though Convergence des catastrophes takes its inspiration from the distant reaches of the European heritage, its actual theoretical formulation is of recent origin. With reference to the work of French mathematician René Thom, it first appeared in Guillaume Faye's L'archéofuturisme (Paris: L'aencre, 1998), arguably the most important work of the "new European nationalism." Indeed, those familiar his style and sentiments are likely to suspect that "Corvus" is Faye himself.
Anticipating today's "chaos theory," Thom's "catastrophe theory" endeavored to map those situations in which gradually changing circumstances culminate in abrupt systemic failure. Among its non-scientific uses, the theory aimed at explaining why relatively smooth changes in stock markets often lead to sudden crashes, why minor disturbances among quiescent populations unexpectedly explode into major social upheavals, or why the Soviet Union, which seemed to be surpassing the United States in the 1970s, fell apart in the 1980s. Implicit in Thom's catastrophe theory is the assumption that all systems -- biological, mechanical, human -- are "fragile," with the potential for collapse. Thus, while a system might prove capable of enormous expansion and growth, even when sustaining internal crises for extended periods, it can, as Thom explains, suddenly unravel if it fails to adapt to changing circumstances, loses its equilibrium, or develops "negative feedback loops" that compound existing strains.
For Corvus -- or Faye -- the liberal collapse, "the tipping point," looks as if it will occur sometime between 2010 and 2020, when the confluence of several gradually mounting internal failures culminate in something more apocalyptic. Though the actual details and date of the impending collapse are, of course, unpredictable, this, he argues, makes it no less certain. And though its effects will be terrible, resulting in perhaps billions of dead, the chaos and violence it promises will nevertheless prepare the way for a return to more enduring truths.
What is this system threatening collapse and what are the forces provoking it? Simply put, it is the technoeconomic system born of 18th-century liberalism -- whose principal exemplar has been the United States and Europe, but whose global impetus now holds most of the world in its grip.
Faye's work does not, however, focus on the system per se. There is already a large literature devoted to it and, in several earlier works, he has examined it at length. The emphasis in Convergence des catastrophes is on delineating the principal fault lines along which collapse is likely to occur. For the globalization of liberal socioeconomic forms, he argues, now locks all the world's peoples into a single complex planetary system whose fragility increases as it becomes increasingly interdependent. Though it is difficult to isolate the catastrophes threatening it (for they overlap with and feed off one another), he believes they will take the following forms:
- The cancerization of the social fabric that comes when an aging European population is deprived of its virile, self-confident traditions; when drug use, permissiveness, and family decline become the norm; when a dysfunctional education system no longer transmits the European heritage; when the Culture Industry fosters mass cretinization; when the Third World consolidates its invasion of the European homelands; and, finally, when the enfeebling effects of these tendencies take their toll on all the other realms of European life.
- The worsening social conditions accompanying these tendencies, he predicts, will be exacerbated by an economic crisis (or crises) born of massive indebtedness, speculation, non-regulation, corruption, interdependence, and financial malpractices whose global ramifications promise a "correction" more extreme than that of the 1930s.
- These social and economic upheavals are likely to be compounded by ecological devastation and radical climatic shifts that accelerate deforestation and desiccation, disrupt food supplies, spread famine and disease, deplete natural resources (oil, along with land and water), and highlight the unsustainability of the world's present overpopulation.
- The scarcity and disorders these man-made disasters bring will not only provoke violent conflicts, but cause the already discredited state to experience increased paralysis, enhancing thus the prospect of global chaos, especially as it takes the form of strife between a cosmopolitan North and an Islamic South.
These catastrophes, Faye argues, are rooted in practices native to liberal modernity. For the globalization of Western civilizational forms, particularly American-style consumerism, has created a latently chaotic situation, given that its hyper-technological, interconnected world system, dependent on international trade, driven by speculators, and indifferent to virtually every non-economic consideration, is vulnerable to a diverse range of malfunctions. Its pathological effects have indeed already begun to reach their physical limit. For once the billion-plus populations of India and China, already well embarked on the industrializing process, start mass-producing cars, the system will simply become unfit for human habitation. The resource depletion and environmental degradation that will follow are, though, only one of the system's tipping points.
No less seriously, the globalizing process creates a situation in which minor, local disputes assume planetary significance, as conflicts in remote parts of the world are imposed on the more advanced parts, and vice versa. ("The 9/11 killers were over here," Pat Buchanan writes, "because we were over there.") In effect, America's "Empire of Disorder" is no longer restricted to the periphery, but now threatens the metropolis. Indeed, each new advance in globalization tends to diminish the frontier between external and internal wars, just as American sponsored globalization provokes the terrorism it ostensively resists. The cascading implication of these developments have, in fact, become strikingly evident. For instance, if one of the hijacked Boeings of 9/11 had not been shot down over Pennsylvania and instead reached Three-Mile Island, the entire Washington-New York area would have been turned into a mega-Chernobyl -- destroying the U.S. economy, as well as the global order dependent on it. A miniature nuke smuggled into an East Coast port by any of the ethnic gangs specializing in illegal shipments would have a similar effect. Revealingly, speculation on such doom-day scenarios is now seen as fully plausible.
But even barring a dramatic act of violence, catastrophe looms in all the system's domain's, for it is as much threatened by its own entropy (in the form of social-racial disorder, economic crisis, and ecological degradation), as it is by more frontal assaults. This is especially the case with the global economy, whose short-term casino mentality refuses the slightest accountability. Accordingly, its movers and shakers think nothing of casting their fate to fickle stock markets, running up bankrupting debts, issuing fiat credit, fostering a materialistic culture of unbridled consumption, undermining industrial values, encouraging outsourcing, de-industrialization, and wage cutting, just as they remain impervious to the ethnocidal effects of international labor markets and the growing criminality of corporate practices.
Such irresponsible behaviors are, in fact, simply another symptom of the impending crisis, for the system's thinkers and leaders are no longer able to distinguish between reality and their virtualist representation of it, let alone acknowledge the folly of their practices. Obsessed with promoting the power and privileges sustaining their crassly materialist way of life and the progressive, egalitarian, and multicultural principles undergirding the global market, they see the world only in ways they are programmed to see it. The ensuing "reality gap" deprives them, then, of the capacity both to adapt to changing circumstances or address the problems threatening the system's operability. (The way the Bush White House gathers and interprets "intelligence," accepting only that which accords with its ideological needs, is perhaps the best example of this). In this spirit, the system's leaders tirelessly ensure us that everything is getting better, that new techniques will overcome the problems generated by technology, that unbridled materialism and self-gratification have no costs, that cultural nihilism is a form of liberation, that the problems caused by climatic changes, environmental degradation, overpopulation, and shrinking energy reserves will be solved by extending and augmenting the practices responsible for them. These dysfunctional practices are indeed pursued as if they are crucial to the system's self-legitimacy. Thus, at the very moment when the system's self-corrective mechanisms have been marginalized and the downhill slide has become increasingly immune to correction, the charlatans, schemers, and careerists in charge persist in propagating the belief that everything is "hunky-dory."
Karl Marx spilt a great deal of ink lambasting ideologues who thought capitalism arose from natural principles, that all hitherto existing societies had preordained the market's triumph, or that a social order subordinate to economic imperatives represented the highest stage of human achievement. Today, the "new global bourgeoisie" gives its euronationalist critics even greater cause for ridicule. Paralyzed by an ideology that bathes itself in optimistic bromides, the system's rulers "see nothing and understand nothing," assuming that the existing order, in guaranteeing their careers, is a paragon of civilizational achievement, that the 20,000 automobiles firebombed every year in France by Muslim gangs is not sign of impending race war, that the non-white hordes ethnically cleansing European neighborhoods will eventually be turned into peaceful, productive citizens, that the Middle East will democratize, that the spread of human rights, free-markets, and new technologies will culminate in a consumer paradise, that limitless consumption is possible and desirable, that everyone, in effect, can have it all.
Nothing, Faye argues, can halt the system's advance toward the abyss. The point of no return has, indeed, already been passed. Fifteen years of above average temperatures, growing greenhouse gases, melting ice caps, conspicuous biological deterioration, and the imminent peaking of oil reserves, combined with an uncontrolled Third World demographic boom, massive First World indebtedness, social policies undermining the state's monopoly on our loyalties, and a dangerous geopolitical realignment -- each of these potentially catastrophic developments is preparing the basis of the impending collapse. Those who think a last minute international agreement will somehow save the day simply whistle pass the graveyard. Washington's attitude (even more pig-headed than Beijing's) to the modest Kyoto Accords -- which would have slowed down, not halted greenhouse emissions -- is just one of the many signs that the infernal machine cannot be halted. The existing states and international organizations are, in any case, powerless to do anything, especially the sclerotic "democracies" of Europe and United States, for their corrupt, short-sighted leaders have not the slightest understanding of what is happening under their very noses, let alone the will to take decisive action against it. Besides, they would rather subsidize bilingual education and Gay Pride parades (or, on the conservative side, ban Darwin) than carry out structural reforms that might address some of their more glaring failures. For such a system, the sole solution, Faye insists, is catastrophe.
The ecological, economic, demographic, social, civilizational, and geopolitical cataclysms now in the process of converging will bring about the collapse of liberalism's technoeconomic civilization. In one of the most striking parts of his book, Faye juxtaposes two very different TV images to illustrate the nature of the present predicament: one is of a troubled President Bush, whose Forest Gump antics left him noticeably perplexed on 9/11; the other is of the traditionally-dressed, but Kalachinokov-bearing Bin Laden, posing as a new Mohammed, calmly and confidently proclaiming the inevitable victory of his rag-tag jihadists. These two images -- symbolizing the archaic violence that promises to disturb the narcoticized sleep of a sickened modernity -- sum up for Faye the kind of world in which we live, especially in suggesting that the future belongs to militant traditionalists rooted in their ancestral heritage, rather than high-tech, neo-liberal "whimps" like Bush, who are alienated from the most elementary expressions of Europe's incomparable legacy.
Though rejecting liberalism's monstrous perversion of European life, Faye does so not as a New Age Luddite or a left-wing environmentalist. He argues that a technoeconomic civilization based on universalist and egalitarian principles is a loathsome abnormality -- destructive of future generations and past accomplishments. But while rejecting its technological, bureaucratic, cosmopolitan, and anti-white practices, he fully accepts modern science. He simply states the obvious: that the great technological and economic accomplishments of Europe cannot be extended to the world's six billion people -- let alone tomorrow's ten billion -- without fatal consequence. For this reason, he predicts that science and industry in a post-catastrophe world will have no choice but to change, becoming the province of a small elite, not the liberal farce that attempts to transform all the world's peoples into American-style consumers. Similarly, Faye does not propose a restoration of lost forms, but rather the revitalization of those ancient spirits which might enable our children to engage the future with the confidence and daring of their ancestors. Thus, as befits a work of prophecy, Faye's survey of the impending tempests aims at preparing us for what is to come, when the high flood waters and hurricane winds clear away the system's ethnocidal illusions and create the occasion for another resurgence of European being. It aims, in a word, at helping Europeans to resume the epic course of their history.
[Michael O'Meara, Ph.D., studied social theory at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes in Sciences Sociales and modern European history at the University of California. He is the author of New Culture, New Right: Anti-Liberalism in Postmodern Europe (2004)]
Saturday, 7 November 2009
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I personally think those at the very top of the pyramid know exactly what they are doing, Western Civilisation is under attack. from within.
They are carrying out this attack Every which way they can, there is a Jewish Rabbi, saying western Europeans are too selfish to have children, this is more psychological repression, we are not having children because of deliberate anti family policies pushed by the state and via the media.
This is in addition to the 7.2 Million abortions carried out in state and private clinics that have miraculously sprung up in every town, clinics where state trained nurses whisper to our young girls, 'it's only cells'
This is in addition to the many ads we see everywhere advising the use of contraception, frightening people out of procreation through fear of thrush, chlamydia, Aids, etc etc etc.
It is the state that has pushed Globalism, undermined the church, allowed the media to push the anti family agenda through the media, it is not the fault of the British people.
It is an orchstrated campaign.
In just the same way as it is not the British peoples fault regarding road congestion, landfill problems, Pollution, it wasn't the British people who opened the immigration floodgates...
Neither is it our fault that drinks now come in plastic bottles that must be recycled, I was perfectly happy with waxed cardboard cartons.
And what about making these plastic bottles have a refund value on them.
The British people cannot do anything about Lord Sainsbury if he chooses to sell drinks in plastic bottles that the Govt says are bad for the environment, do they fine Lord Sainsbury, no, they fine us instead, and since we cannot do anything about it, nothing will change.
What if Lord Sainsbury came up with a non polluting drinks bottle, my guess is He and the Govt wouldn't let it see the light of day.
Everything that is happening, from Low Birthrates to mass immigration, to the deindustrialisation we see going on is by design, orchestrated by those at the top of the pyramid.
The Baby P Case is a direct result of the anti family, anti moral, anti christian, chav indoctrination pushed by our media day in day out.
It is a deliberate and orchestrated policy.....
using every available means to attack Western civilisation.
Silent weapons for a quiet war
Drugs and the Media
Dumbing Down Western Society
Genocide and the Deliberate Destruction of Great Britain
Unknown to most, Someone is at war with Western Civilisation and has been for decades.
Post a Comment