The decision of Chris Jackson and Mike Easter to join the NF is a welcome move.
At the moment the NF is led by Eddie Morrison, a man not motivated by wanting the best for the nationalist movement or the NF but a man motivated mainly by spite against the BNP and hatred for past fall outs with BNP officials.
When Morrison is 'retired' as the de facto leader of the NF and replaced by Chris Jackson ( after the unlawful forcing out of Tom Holmes who resigned yesterday ) which will be in about a week or so's time, we can hope that with Morrison out of the way that Chris Jackson is half the leader he thinks he is.
If he is half the leader he thinks he is, then the first thing he will do is demand that there will be no 'head to head' election battles with the BNP once he runs the NF.
If the NF decided under Jackson that they intend to enter elections, then he needs to demonstrate leadership and demand they do not do so in order to split the nationalist vote.
I am sure that the NF would not wish to split the nationalist vote, for if it was demonstrated that the intent behind recent events within the NF in relation to the Morrison cabal seizing control of the party was simply to ensure the NF can be used as a vehicle to undermine the BNP vote in forthcoming elections, that this misuse of the NF for such a purpose would not be looked upon kindly.
The leaving of Jackson and Easter is not unexpected, they are principled nationalists from an era when British Nationalism did not have to comprimise in order to survive.
In the political environment we exist within today, then those who put principle before pragmatism do not survive upon the battlefield.
Our aim is to survive, to evolve and to fight on, until such a time that victory is possible.
British Nationalism during the present time period cannot win a political struggle.
Therefore the aim of British Nationalists is to survive until such time as the political environment changes.
The BNP as a mainstream British Nationalist party is positioned politically in the mainstream of the European Nationalist movement as well as the British Nationalist movement, and the BNP are a party whose contacts and affiliations are Europe wide as being members of the European Nationalist Block.
By being within the EU this means we as a political party have responsibilities that also transcend the national level.
We are not just a British Nationalist party, we are also part of a fledgling European Brotherhood of sovereign nation states dedicated to the mutual defence of our European national cultures and European peoples.
As part of this EU block we work to form a Pan-European Network of Nationalist political parties whose powers can be pooled together in mutual defence - the living embodiment of the European ideal itself.
A Europe of Nations, not a Nation of Europe.
The alliances we have forged in Europe are the shield for our peoples future defence.
Out of the bloody carnage of the 20th century Brothers Wars which almost destroyed our people and continent, we must now arise anew and form a new nexus and a new idealism around which we can gather and unite.
European brotherhood is such an ideal, and the work the BNP does today in Europe is the basis of alliances for the future.
Therefore politics is merely one aspect of the many different struggles we must fight at the same time.
The BNP has the primary political struggle to fight in Britain, whilst the NF has a different struggle to commence.
Instead of seeking to expand as a political party, the NF needs to adopt a nationalist community building agenda and an active street presence.
If Chris Jackson can harness the energy of the NF and direct it into building a musical network, a community network, an educational network and a prison outreach programme for white prisoners in British jails and also build a powerful street presence for the NF around the country, then all the good for us in the BNP.
The Fare Left and the UAF have had the upper hand on the streets for far too long.
Having the EDL and the NF keep the UAF busy with active street presences will ensure they do not bother with the BNP as much.
The movement of UKIP into 'racist territory' with its attack on Islam will also require money, time, attention and action from the UAF also diminishing the capacity to target the BNP.
The Reform Group are sincere nationalists and if they do what is required then they could make a real difference to nationalism in this country.
The more nationalist groups that operate in the UK, then the less attention the BNP generates.
I just hope they dont use their leaving as an excuse to attack the party or its leader or officials or members.
They should just walk away and keep their criticisms to themselves.
If they are decent nationalists then they will put the interests of the nationalist movement first and just get on with proving to us all just how talented, efficient and leadership material they are by how much they improve the NF.
If they sit on Stormfront all the time bitching, pissing and whining about the BNP with the rest of the keyboard warriors that infest that site, like Tom Lindon and the NF cabal on their at the moment, then they will have proved themselves unsuitable for leadership.
The talented do not need to attack their peers, they demonstrate their credentials with successes.
Those that spend all their time bitching about the BNP, and who have demonstrated no sizeable rise in the level of electoral support of their party nor any organisational improvement of the organisations since they have joined, such as Tom Linden and Eddy Morrison since they joined the NF, should just shut up and get on with the job of promoting their particular organisation.
Those who rise above factions, prove their superior leadership skills.
Best of luck to Mike and Chris in the NF.
Sunday 20 December 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
I do not know too much about Chris Jackson other than what I have read from The Green Arrow website, the British Nationalist blog and North-west nationalists blog. However, what I have read I don't like, but I will resist the urge to launch into an attack on the whole "Reform Group" bollocks - however, I will say that they seem to have no grasp of reality and are living in the past: banging on about how the BNP have sold-out and how Nick Griffin is an establishment plant. Pure fucking stupid shit - only idiots would make such asinine comments - but that seems to be the depth of their critique of the BNP under the leadership of King Nick.
Personally, I am glad Jackson is gone. Let's see if he turns out to be half the man he makes himself out to be now that he can't hide behind pathetic criticism of Nick Griffin and the BNP all the time.
Country before ego, you can bet your life our enemies are hoping for the opposite.
We must act strategically, coordinated, just like an Army.
I'd like to see deals between any Patriotic Ukipers out there too and we need more independants.
There is another way BNP can help, have a look at all MP's find out who is half decent and Don't fight them at election time, put those resources into constituences you want to fight.
Instruct BNP voters in areas where there are half decent MP's to vote for them to ensure their success.
Not sure how accurate the site is but www.theyworkforyou.com
I was once going to try to get to see a member of the house of Lords, I looked him up on theyworkforyou.com and found out he'd never once voted against the Govt on major issues like ID cards, war in iraq and a number of other issues.
I decided not to pursue the meeting in the end.
An obvious Govt yes man.
"Andraste" said
"I do not know too much about Chris Jackson other than what I have read from The Green Arrow website, the British Nationalist blog and North-west nationalists blog. However, what I have read I don't like, but I will resist the urge to launch into an attack on the whole "Reform Group" bollocks"
If you don't know much about thee people then why the hell don't you keep your pathetic asinine opinions to yourself? Anyone can write and post opinions on the netso how do you know that what you have read on those various blogs are accurate or correct? Why don't smart-arsed alecs like you Mr "Andraste" get off from behind your anonymous keyboards and actually go and speak to the people concerned in person, or do your own research rather than follow what other people have written? Considering that you are one of those "intelligent" and "independent" minded "nationalists" who constantly disparage the tabloids and those who get their opinions rom the mass media, it's rather ironic that you of all people have condescended into doing exactly the same in your asinine opinions of Chris Jackson and the Refdorm Group.
Bit of a retard I'd say (to use your own oft-quoted words of disparagement.
Chris Jackson and the Reform Group have worked tirelessly for the nationalist cause, and for far longer than most current members of "Nu-BNP" under Nick Griffin have ever done so. Despite working against inconstitutional odds stacked against them they made a fair and legal leadership challenge and when that failed they simply got back to fighting for the nationalist and BNP cause. they are all honorourable men who still retain those values and ethics within nationalism that seem to have been largely lost and forgotten by Nu-BNP and its members.
The article written about the Reform Group was well-written, decent and balanced and without rancour. Let us all hope that the new moves with the NF mark the beginnings of a sea-change within British Nationalism that will see the resurrection of a principled and worthy nationalism.
The contents of this website might be of use if there is any reforming going on, not just in the NF.
Probably usefull for the general public to know how they sre manipulated.
Again I think this sort of stuff should be discussed regularly on BNP sites, to inform the public, I know bits but my writing skills leave a bit to be desired.
Changing minds
Well said Lee, a sensible analogy of something of nothing that could damage both sides fighting for the same cause.
I have met a few real Nasty ignorant so called Nationalists,to be honest mate,but thankfully they are a real minority.
But something both sides of the same side should keep in check; always, 1 bad apple !!
T
The UAF will be celebrating tonight for we all know that the first thing these men will do is decide who they will put up against Nick at Dagenham.
Don't forget the NF stood against us in the GLA election taking what might have been vaulable votes from us.
They are as good as members of the uaf.
I really love this blog post, Lee and sincerely hope that Chris Jackson and co read it and understand how vital the role of the NF can be in supporting the BNP while maintaining their ideological principles. They have a vital role to play in this (covering our arse, so to speak) and we, in the BNP are holding out our hand of friendship to the NF and hoping that a nudge and a wink will be enough to convey our comradeship. They have to get the message! Please please let them get the message! The future of our race depends upon them understanding certain subtleties and being aware of the sinister manipulations including those coming from the "keep your friends close, and your enemies closer" multiracialist elements within the BNP who are even in the position of being stood as council and parliamentary candidates. The BNP is not selling out, but being very pragmatic and taking things right to the line (but never overstepping that line - hopefully!)
Part 1.
Anonymous (21 December 2009 07:16) said:
"If you don't know much about thee people then why the hell don't you keep your pathetic asinine opinions to yourself? Anyone can write and post opinions on the netso how do you know that what you have read on those various blogs are accurate or correct?"
I have the right to express my opinions on this subject, and as I have stated (and you acknowledge) I admitted that I didn't know that much about Chris Jackson, and I qualified my sources of information. I fail to see how I am not entitled to submit my opinions; or do you believe that one has to be an expert before ever making a comment? That would rather seem to be at odds with the principle of blogs and informal discussion. It's not like I am making an official statement.
"Why don't smart-arsed alecs like you Mr "Andraste" get off from behind your anonymous keyboards and actually go and speak to the people concerned in person, or do your own research rather than follow what other people have written?"
Not that I have to explain myself but for sake of discussion I am an active member of the BNP. Being active online and being active on the streets are not mutually exclusive - but you seem to assume so. Anyways, I have read direct statements from Chris Jackson and the whole "Reform Group" nonsense, and have researched them enough to make decisions that I am confident I can defend.
To summarise my view of the Reform Group:
i) they are racial nationalists, not ethnic nationalists
ii) they have an obsession with Nick Griffin, and make ludicrous statements about King Nick being an establishment operative; that he is deliberately destroying the BNP; that he is pocketing money from the party - the list of pathetic, immature attacks against Nick go on
iii) I have met Mike Easter on several occasions, in fact, I was initially a member of the BNP under John Tyndall - and in my opinion Mike Easter has a personal vendetta against Nick Griffin
iv) The Reform Group state that the BNP are not achieving success - now, that's just plain bollocks
v) the Reform Group think that the change of the BNP constitution is a betrayal - they can't seem to get their stupid heads round the fact that the BNP has no choice
vi) members of the Reform Group think that standing in the EU elections is betrayal - pure nonsense again
Therefore I cannot agree with them - as they fundamentally are at odds with my perception of modern, successful nationalism - Nick Griffin is the best man for the BNP - no doubt.
Part 2.
"Considering that you are one of those "intelligent" and "independent" minded "nationalists" who constantly disparage the tabloids and those who get their opinions rom the mass media, it's rather ironic that you of all people have condescended into doing exactly the same in your asinine opinions of Chris Jackson and the Refdorm Group."
I see no irony. I stated quite clearly I was not an expert on Chris Jackson, therefore I qualified my position - and at no point did I state I was an expert, I simply proffered my opinion. I posted my comment fully open to replies and discussion. Posting commments on a blog and being open to debate is surely "independent" mindedness.
"Bit of a retard I'd say (to use your own oft-quoted words of disparagement."
You are fully entitled to call me a retard, as much as I am fully entitled to call whomever I wish a retard, i.e. Chris Jackson. I have no problem with you calling whatever you want. Lee's blog is often confrontational and direct, and free expression reigns therefore invective is par for the course.
"Chris Jackson and the Reform Group have worked tirelessly for the nationalist cause, and for far longer than most current members of "Nu-BNP" under Nick Griffin have ever done so."
That's not how I see it - they have worked to usurp Nick Griffin, that's their agenda. Moreover, the ideology of the Reform Group is a throw-back to the dark days of nationalist obscurity characterised by those who are patholigically driven to remain on the fringes of society by their own psychological issues.
I am pleased Jackson and Easter have joined the NF - and hope they do well. Other than that I don't care much for the NF - they exist only in antagonism to the BNP, they are not vital of themselves, hopefully this will change.
I look forward to your reply.
Gearing up for Civil War in the US.
Obama rquests Nato troops for US Rebellion
Oathkeepers preparing for Guerilla war in the US
European Union Times
Andraste, I am on your side. I am just a little confused that you draw a distinction between ethnic nationalists and racial nationalists and would like to know: what do you consider the difference to be?
It seems ridiculous that anyone would criticise the new BNP constitution (as Chris Jackson allegedly has) before it has actually been read by anyone. I hope that those who are suggesting it will be a sell-out will find that in fact it merely underlines ethno-nationalism and cleverly falls in with the letter of the law at the same time. I know this is possible - and it is VITALLY necessary.
To summarise my view of the Reform Group:
i) they are racial nationalists, not ethnic nationalists
REPLY - So are the BNP - not noticed the italian members etc!
ii) they have an obsession with Nick Griffin, and make ludicrous statements about King Nick being an establishment operative; that he is deliberately destroying the BNP; that he is pocketing money from the party - the list of pathetic, immature attacks against Nick go on
REPLY - Do you have any direct evidence of this from these 2 people?
iii) I have met Mike Easter on several occasions, in fact, I was initially a member of the BNP under John Tyndall - and in my opinion Mike Easter has a personal vendetta against Nick Griffin
REPLY - we will see if that manifests in damaging the BNP as the general election looms, there is nothing wrong with having a dislike for someone, after all he had the integrity to leave.
iv) The Reform Group state that the BNP are not achieving success - now, that's just plain bollocks
REPLY - subjective really isn't it!
some might argue that the BNP could have gone a lot further than they are considering the countries transformation.
v) the Reform Group think that the change of the BNP constitution is a betrayal - they can't seem to get their stupid heads round the fact that the BNP has no choice
REPLY - not quite, I think some were exopecting more of a fight and a clearer idea of what was happening, including Jonathon Bowden. Nick could have used question time as a springboard for the fight, yet he surrendered without any political gain, it was quite sad to see the BNP try and spin it as a positive - that gave the impression of selling out.
vi) members of the Reform Group think that standing in the EU elections is betrayal - pure nonsense again
REPLY - yes i would partly agree, however given the money and pentions on offer it could be seen as a threat to corrupting our own politicians.
Perhaps it's time you took off you party line blinkers Andraste, let us wait and see as Lee says.
Being a mere "activist" and speaking in layman's language, I understand the concept of The Reform Group but do feel that the sniping at Nick Griffin is completely out of order. At the end of the day we are all Nationalists but the NF are unelectable at present. Nick Griffin has fought long and hard to get the BNP where it is today. Good luck Reform Group, but please stop attacking Nick Griffin.
Post a Comment