Tuesday 8 September 2009

The Usual Suspects, Newsweek and anti-white propaganda

Newsweek was set up by Eugene Isaac Meyer (October 31, 1875 – July 17, 1959) was an American financier, public official, publisher of the Washington Post newspaper. He served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933. He was the father of publisher Katharine Graham.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Meyer


Todays main owner of Newsweek is his daughter Katherine Graham

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katharine_Graham


In 1988, Graham gave a speech at the CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia:[1]

“ We live in a dirty and dangerous world...There are some things the general public does not need to know and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.

The Newsweek article is written by mentally ill self loathing white liberals who want to teach white children 'ethnic guilt' at the same time as preaching 'Black Pride' - these white liberals are mentally and deserve to be rounded up and incarcerated in mental institutions.

This article is total bollocks.


This is a copy of the e mail I have just sent Barbara Vittrup at the University of Texas ;


vittrup@mail.utexas.edu


I have just read the Newsweek magazine article that references your research work and I just wanted to say that as far as I can see it was the product of a mentally ill, self loathing white liberal who deserves incarceration in a mental health facility.

Your research gave succour to this sickness.

Truly' Physician heal thyself'.

That idea that brainwashing white children to ignore their natural instincts and loathe themselves on the basis of their skin colour will lead to a non-racial liberal society is the same sort of insanity we saw in the Soviet Union - and these people who listen and read this nonsense are teachers and academics.

They deserve arrest and imprisonment.

Note this bit in the main article " The other broad category of conversation, in Harris-Britt's analysis, is ethnic pride. From a very young age, minority children are coached to be proud of their ethnic history. She found that this was exceedingly good for children's self-confidence; in one study, black children who'd heard messages of ethnic pride were more engaged in school and more likely to attribute their success to their effort and ability.

That leads to the question that everyone wonders but rarely dares to ask. If "black pride" is good for African-American children, where does that leave white children? It's horrifying to imagine kids being "proud to be white." Yet many scholars argue that's exactly what children's brains are already computing. Just as minority children are aware that they belong to an ethnic group with less status and wealth, most white children naturally decipher that they belong to the race that has more power, wealth, and control in society; this provides security, if not confidence. So a pride message would not just be abhorrent—it'd be redundant."

Yet in the previous pages of the article the author notes that ;

1) White children are not taught about race by their cringing white liberal parents, so therefore how can children understand they are members of a 'race' that has more power and wealth if parents dont talk about race to them ?

2) If children do not understand the notion of equality, how then can they be said to understand the notion of inequality ?

3) How are children taught , and by whom, that whites are more wealthy than blacks - schools dont and parents dont, so this is another proposition with no evidence at all by the idiot who wrote the article

4) How are white children taught about the 'control of whites' over society when they do not even know they are white ( they are not even talked to about their race by their parents and do not even understand how to define their own skin colour as 'white' according to the article writer in previous paragraphs)

Do you really support this sick, disturbed nonsense.

The idea that white children must be taught 'Ethnic Guilt' and Blacks taught 'Racial Pride' is like the Nazis teaching children about 'superhuman Aryans' and 'subhuman Jews'.

Is this the Liberal Fascist society in its making revealed here ?

The idea that social engineering will triumph over natural instincts led to the Gulags of the Soviet Union and the Concentration Camps of the Nazis.

My god woman, you should be ashamed of yourself giving succour to the Liberal Fascists that wish to create a dystopia based on teaching white children to loathe themselves, their skin and their racial heritage.

No doubt you will be happy when white kids are found cowering in cupboards painting their skin black so they can eradicate the disease of their skin colour.

People like you are mentally diseased and evil.

You would allow white children to suffer in order to normalise your own sick mental illness of racial self loathing.

Not only are you fetishising blacks, you are projecting our own self hate onto white children.

Your are a danger to yourself, a danger to white children and a danger to our society.

Either resign or condemn this article.

L. J. Barnes LLB (Hons)



Note the article below about a recent article in Newsweek ;

http://cofcc.org/?p=6589


06 Sep

Newsweek’s War on White People: “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.”

CofCC.org News Team

Newsweek just launched an all out war on the mental well-being of white children in their September issue. The article is titled “See Baby Discriminate.” The article demands, with religious fanaticism, that white children be made to shun all knowledge of racial differences and taught to feel guilty. Newsweek actually printed “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.” The Newsweek article actually states that white children should be made to feel guilty to “knock down their glorified view of white people,” while black children should be built up with “ethnic pride.” White parents, and only white parents, are called on to go to great lengths to brainwash their own children starting at age 3.


However, amidst the extremist statements by Newsweek, some real bombshells about racial realities are admitted

Here are some highlights:

“Kids as young as 6 months judge based on skin color.” – Newsweek

White parents, who welcome multiculturalism and embrace diversity, are terrified to talk to their own children about race for fear of what their own children might say.

75% of non-white parents talk to their children about race, compared to only 25% of white parents.

White children 5 to 7 attending racially diverse schools universally had a better opinion of their own race than other races.

Whites are called on to begin intense multi-cultural indoctrination using videos and parental discussions at age 3, so as not to miss the right “developmental window.”

White children should be made to feel guilty for alleged wrongdoings by their race, to increase positive attitudes towards blacks.

Black children need to be coached on “ethnic pride” to pump them up and make them more likely to succeed in life.

553 scientists signed a 2007 Supreme Court school amicus brief supporting school desegregation. However, the brief used many qualifiers and only said that desegregation “may” improve black performance. There was no real confidence in desegregation on the part of the scientists.

Diverse schools do not lead to more cross-race relationships. In fact the opposite is true. The more diverse a school, the more students self-segregate by race.
White children prefer a white Santa Claus and black children prefer a black Santa Claus.

See Article.

What you will see strikingly absent in Newsweek’s whitey hating diatribe of making white children feel guilty and making black children feel proud, is the fact that black children actually have higher self-esteem already than white children. In fact the people with the lowest self-esteem tend to be Orientals.

American Sociological Association (Source)

Past research indicates that black adolescents consistently have higher self-esteem than white students. Other research demonstrates that self-esteem has positive effects on academic achievement. However, black students have lower academic achievement than white students while concurrently exhibiting higher self-esteem.








































Add to Technorati Favorites

10 comments:

Andraste said...

Excellent message to Barbara Vittrup, your email is spot on.

lormarie said...

First I need to say that I don't believe that children judge skin color at 6 months of age. I do believe that children notice racial favoritism as young as 5 or 6 years. While I don't think it's right to teach white children to hate themselves, I see the point about it being redundant to push white pride when they can so easily pick up on it through societal cues.

Defender of Liberty said...

What effect do you think it has on poor white children to live in a society where the idea of white privelige is pushed as a way to bolster black self worth ?

It is the white community that are the forgotten ones, whilst black poverty and alienation are in Newsweek, on the media news shows and in the newspapers - poor white people are ignored, forgotten and despised whilst blacks feted, helped and their plight publicised.

It is time blacks got the chip off their shoulders, and started to demand that the plight of poor whites who live in the same communities as them is addressed and dealt with.

If they dont do that then is it because they are racists or they simply care more about their own people than whites.

There are more poor whites in the US than poor blacks - but no-one speaks for them as they are white and are 'priveliged' even when they are homeless, sleeping on the streets and unemployed.

This myth of white privlige is racist BS.

Andraste said...

Typically lormarie cannot extract her head from her anus.

She garbles:

"I see the point about it being redundant to push white pride when they can so easily pick up on it through societal cues."

Utter, utter nonsense... my god you are so completely delusional, you turn reality on it's head in order to justify your psychosis - as with all mentally unstable people.

Name any of these so-called "societal cues" that ensure children pick up "white pride". I am genuinely interested for you to list them, bet you won't, because you will reveal just how demented you are - and you like to maintain the guise of sanity.

Anyway, it's simple... children are taught equally, any deviation away from that principle is discrimination and brainwashing.

Lee wrote:

"The idea that white children must be taught 'Ethnic Guilt' and Blacks taught 'Racial Pride' is like the Nazis teaching children about 'superhuman Aryans' and 'subhuman Jews'."

Spot on, that is absolute irrefutable logic.

lormarie said...

White Pride: it has to be said that many whites reject it not out of self-hate but rather in favor of Ethnic/culture pride. Whites regularly champion euro pride here in the states (St pats day, Italian feasts, there are even Scandinavian festivals and cultural centers here in the US). This could also be understood in your previous post about white nationalism vs British nationalism. Upon reading your post, I got the feeling that you believe white nationalism isn't feasible. Perhaps most whites feel the same way.

Re: poor whites. Ok, I will concede that I don't see much about poor whites in the media. Whites control the media so maybe they do not want the image of a poor needy white reaching the masses. I noticed that whites tend to look down on poor whites calling them white trash, trailer trash, etc. Maybe they are ashamed because they want racist stereotypes to remain. They can label poor blacks as lazy or inferior (because they are poor) but what happens to that stereotype when whites live under the same conditions?

Andraste said...

"Whites control the media so maybe they do not want the image of a poor needy white reaching the masses. I noticed that whites tend to look down on poor whites calling them white trash, trailer trash, etc. Maybe they are ashamed because they want racist stereotypes to remain. They can label poor blacks as lazy or inferior (because they are poor) but what happens to that stereotype when whites live under the same conditions?"

The media are the people who regularly use terms such as “white trash” and allow the use of such an obvious racist term to go unchallenged, in fact the term is often used in apparent humour (although it is not humour, merely a racist attack dressed as humour) to describe poor whites, the very same media who would scream “racist” and relentlessly attack anyone who called poor blacks “black trash”… I have never heard anyone in the media label poor blacks “lazy” or “inferior” – but I expect the only people who could get away with such statements would be other blacks, whereas blacks can openly call poor whites “white trash”. And this blatant anti-white racism exists in the media who Lormarie states are controlled by “whites” – this would prove the case that these apparent “whites who control the media” are in fact self-loathers, and promote self-loathing in other whites.

Andraste said...

Lormarie... still waiting for you to point out those "societal cues" that push white pride...

Anonymous said...

'''I see the point about it being redundant to push white pride when they can so easily pick up on it through societal cues.''

Elucidate

Anonymous said...

Letters@newsweek.com

alanorei said...

On white pride or maybe more accurately, white heritage there's always The Commemorative Air Force, formerly known as The Confederate Air Force. Based in Texas, this is largely a white American initiative but it does have a section on the Tuskegee Airmen, black Americans who flew combat missions in WW2 in Italy. It is instructive, though that the restoration of one of the early P-51 Mustang variants flown by the Tuskegee pilots appears to have been a white American project. Therein lies the engineering initiative and expertise, I suggest.

If white American children could be given some insights into the above, it might help restore some of their sense of identity.

Especially when you consider that powered flight, pretty well indispensable in today's world, was pioneered by a couple of white Americans named Wright, who also just happen to have been fundamentalist Christians. Introduction of that particular belief system, germane to the foundations of the US, to North America and its propagation throughout the continent was again mainly a white European/American undertaking that ultimately benefitted all races resident there.