Thursday 28 January 2010

The Mask Drops

During the 1960's and 1970's the Red Army Faction and Baader-Meinhof Group undertook a prolonged campaign of terrorism against the German State. This was done with the intent of provoke the German State to reveal its true 'fascist' nature by forcing it to enact legislation and impose laws that truly were fascistic - so that the people would see the true nature of their leaders and the German state and then rise up against them.

The court case today has revealed the true nature of the people that run our country.

They have revealed that Liberalism has evolved into a form of state sponsored racism, whereby the indigenous British people are prohibited from organising politcally on the grounds that they do not exist and that to allow them to do is 'racist'.

The fact that there are thousands of charities, organisations and groups for non-whites in Britain, but not ONE for the indigenous British people means that a state sanctioned and enforced racism exists at every level of society aimed solely at undermining the rights and interests of the indigenous majority and which is intended to usurp democracy itself by empowering the rights of non-indigenous minorities over that of the democratic majority.


Therefore Liberalism = Fascism.

According to the powers that be ;

1) The Indigenous British people do not exist

2) The indigenous British people have no right to organise politically in the multi-cultural system in order to represent, protect and promote their interests in the multi-cultural society and democratic process.

3) That democracy, and the votes of one million people, are irrelevant to the scum that run our country

4) That the aim of the people who run this country is to ensure we as a people are denied the right to exist, our national culture removed and our homeland and way of life is taken away from us.

In effect it is a declaration of genocide against us.

But by confirming in this court case that this is their true agenda, they have removed the mask from their own faces and revealed the true Anti-democratic, Anti-British people hatred and Anti-British agenda that motivates them.

They did this too themselves.

Now every British person can see for themselves that the aim of the Establishment at all levels is treason - that they intend to swamp us with immigrants, destroy our British culture and British way of life and make us a powerless minority in our home land.

That is simply treason.

But the answer is not to get angry.

The answer is to get even.

Sometimes you have to lose the battle to win the war.

But you can only win the war by staying in the fight.

The EHRC and the maggots in the Whorehouses of Parliament want us to get angry and not think about our next step.

Logic is the answer.

We must give them the stupid and meaningless assurances they want us to give them and we must play the game they want us to play. As long as they are in charge they can make the rules of the game of course.

The aim of the game is therefore to stay in the fight and get into power.

We must give them all the guarantees they want in order to comply with their laws.

But they, and we know, that this is simply a game of legal chess.

The assurances we have to give to the scum that run this country, such as the unelected filth in the EHRC, has no meaning to us other than we have to obey it to comply with the law.

The same situation relates to expense expenses and election laws of course.

We have to abide by those laws as much as we have to abide by this law.

But the changing of the constitution is meaningless as to who we are, what we believe and what we will do when we get into power.

They can never force us to change our own personal principles, beliefs and ideals.

These we hold within us, as a sacred flame, until we get into power,

Once we get into power then we can change the rule of the game and pass our own laws.

That is why we must stay in the fight until we get into power.

The National Revolution to come is not in the BNP constitution, it is not on any piece of paper or wormtongued words - the National Revolution begins the day we take power.

On that day we deliver unto our enemies our justice.

We have learnt your lessons well.

You have made us ready for power and by your actions, you have shown us how to use power.

What you have sown, so shall you reap.

The sole aim of us participating in the political process is to take power.

The true revolutionaries of history have learnt that the only effective way to take power is by the ballot box.

The more that any terrorist group attacks the state, the stronger the state grows.

The state feeds on terror.

Therefore the only way to kill the poisoned state, is to take control of the poisoned state and kill it from within.

That is what we will do.

We will play by their pathetic political and legal games and stay in the fight.

At the same time we must begin the process of creating a mass social and cultural movement to exist alongside the political struggle - so that the moment we begin to grow politically the state will understand that an direct attack us is also an attack on our community and our culture.

At the moment we have neglected the Social and Cultural struggles that MUST run alongside our political struggle.

Only by creating movements that mobilise the masses outside politics, can we ensure our safety as a political movement.

The political movement must be the point of the spear and the cultural and social movements the power that propels the spear forwards into its target.

That target is political power.

The time has come for the British Nationalist movement to end its decades of infighting and simply do one thing - organise your own people and stop attacking each other.

If the British Nationalist movement simply concentrated on recruiting, expanding and politicising our people then we will have taken a huge step forward.


Add to Technorati Favorites


Anonymous said...

Hello LJB, You've probably been asked a thousand times already, but how can the BNP be taken to court for failing to comply with a law that has yet to come into effect?
And is it possible for you to go into a little more depth for us to understand the decisions that the BNP is being forced to make? Thanks

Anonymous said...

Great Summary

''What you have sown, so shall you reap''


and for my part I shall work on the cultural and creative energy as well as ongoing political help

Adrian P said...

The BNP probably can't be taken to court, but the only way they could decide this was to go to court, I yhink the intention was to Bleed the BNP of funds.
Giving in and agreeing was a smart move, defused the whole situation, Nick Griffin has dodged these sorts of agendas before, several times they've tried to imprison him, he's had yrs of abuse and lies.
BNP gets my vote in the GE.

No one else represents me

Kratos said...

Jewish banks, investors and hedge fund all employ other Jews only and yet they do not make a fuss about "Jewz only" policies.

Why would the BNP make a mockery of itself if she is not suffering from self hate?

How many blacks work for that UKIP or the Green Party owned and operated by Jewz?

Grow up BNP and do not embarrass white people.

Anonymous said...

Exactly Lee it's only Semantics, we will adapt where necessary to achieve our goal of being elected to form a Government, this is our priority, we will say the words they want to hear but they will be meaningless...Donna

Jane said...

You don't have to publish this Lee, but I do hope you will read it. I am an organiser for a branch of the BNP and I am seriously considering that I cannot further support the party if we drop our written avowed statement to protect the indigenous British. We should exist to fight for our ethnicity to be acknowledged because otherwise it will be the last nail in our coffin.
The enemies tell us we don't exist but this is clearly nonsense since our physical bodies are on this Earth and we have to be categorised as one ethnicity or another (which we can therefore fight to preserve). Also the UN says that an indigenous people must be acknowleged just because the people in question say they are an ethnicity ("real or imagined"). We should therefore argue our case in the Court of Human Rights.

My experience as an organiser is that our party is flooded out with members who insist to me that our ideas of preserving our ethnicity are futile and that it is "living in the past". Because the BNP appeals to people on so many levels other than racially, we are attracting a bulk of people who will not understand the importance of ethnicity and will dilute our party hopelessly. Only a handful of us at the top really seem to "get" what our core mandate is. I firmly believe we must NEVER drop our statements about standing for our indigenous people and will leave the party should that happen as I don't wish to flog a dead horse. I am not interested in the phony NF either.
Also, why not just get some of our non white supporters to come to court and say they support what we are doing? After all, no one is surprised when Whites support the struggle of the Native Americans in the US. It is the same idea.
I BELIEVE WE HAVE OUR ENEMIES ON THE RUN AND THEY ARE BLUFFING. THEY ARE CLUTCHING AT STRAWS. Let us plow into them now and not let them write our Constitution and policies for us!

Anonymous said...

There is one charity, Lee. The Steadfast Trust.

Anti-Globalist said...

I hope the BNP will not choose the path of least resistance, feeding the crocodile in the hopes that we will be the last eaten.

Let this Churchill quote never apply to our courageous chairman:

"He was given a choice between war and dishonor. He chose dishonor and he will have war anyway."

Believe me - our enemies will make us suffer any amount of humiliation but never will they be appeased as we grovel to them - instead our retreat will buoy them and make them even more of a dangerous threat. Stand up to them and you may find they are paper tigers.

Anonymous said...

'until we get into power,'

Sorry, that made me howl. Keep on dreaming with your imaginary genocides.

Andraste said...

Part 1.

This post is somewhat moot being as the amended constitution has already been draughted, however I had to have my say.

Those who say we should fight the EHRC in the courts are living in Cloud-Cuckoo Land. It is simply not possible for several reasons:

i) we could not afford the huge legal costs, and even if we could -
ii) it would completely distract our energies from fighting the general election
iii) and we would almost certainly lose considering the entire establishment are against us and there is no way we would get a fair trial

The smart move is to make the necessary changes to our constitution that will prevent attacks from the EHRC. Even if this means removing passages that may be attractive to members but which are legal suicide and provide our enemies with openings against us; passages such as:

“We are pledged to the continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence of the unity and of the integrity of the indigenous British and of the government of … our ‘British Homeland’.”


“[the BNP are] implacably opposed to the promotion by any means of any form of integration or assimilation of any indigenous people, including the indigenous British, which is likely to deprive such people of their integrity as a distinct people or the distinctiveness of their cultural values or of their ethnic or national identities or characteristics.”

Now, thinking like the EHRC I would expect them to say these passages are vague, and they are right to some extent. Why make a rod for our own back with such statements?

Andraste said...

Part 2.

Why not use the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as a basis:

"Affirming that indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples, while recognizing the right of all peoples to be different, to consider themselves different, and to be respected as such,

Affirming also that all peoples contribute to the diversity and richness of civilizations and cultures, which constitute the common heritage of humankind,

Affirming further that all doctrines, policies and practices based on or advocating superiority of peoples or individuals on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust,

Reaffirming that indigenous peoples, in the exercise of their rights, should be free from discrimination of any kind"


We should further state that the BNP do not believe in racial supremacy.

Andraste said...

Part 3.

Article 19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights make interesting reading and could also be incorporated in some fashion:

"Article 19.

* Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

* (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
* (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association."


Furthermore articles 10 and 11 of the EU Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is interesting:

"Article 10 Freedom of expression

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include
freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and
ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of
broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.

2 The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and
responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions,
restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a
democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial
integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the
protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or
rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in
confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the

Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom
of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade
unions for the protection of his interests.

2 No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than
such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic
society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the
prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or
for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. This article shall
not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these
rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the
administration of the State."


If we use these documents how could the EHRC argue against us?

Being largely ignorant of the law my comments may be completely useless, I understand that.

Anyways, consider UKIP, nowhere in the UKIP constitution does it state they will oppose Islamification, and yet they are presenting policies on this issue. Consider further that nowhere in the Labour constituion does it state they will commit genocide against the indigenous British folk, and yet this is exactly what they are doing. Therefore we can see ideas transcend the need to be written down and recorded in a formal constitution.

Sometimes less is more and we can be smart with what we don’t say. The BNP and our principles are embedded in the subconscious of our people, and I don’t think playing extremely costly legal games with the EHRC is going to do anything other than damage us, when we could avoid unnecessary problems quite simply.

When we gain power we can amend the laws, until then we play smart.

Andraste said...

Just got my copy of the constitution. Fantastic work. I feel my previous comment was somewhat hasty, so I would like to retract my criticisms.