Leo McKinstry is bang on target here, though lets not forget that it was the Russians and the Germans that both invaded Poland at the same time.
The idea we fought the war to 'free Poland' is just nonsense, when we fought alongside the murdering Bolshevik scum that were murdering millions of Poles in massacres such as the Katyn Forest massacre and we left the Poles under the Iron Curtain for another fifty years of Red Terror at the end of the war.
We did not fight to free Poland from the Nazis, when we fought alongside the Russians who kept Poland under the communist jackboot after the war.
The tragedy is that whilst the Bolsheviks from Russia were killing poles, the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia that ran the secret police were killing millions of ethnic Russians, poles and their fellow Jews.
Stalin, the insane butcher that he was, was prepared to allow the Jewish Bolsheviks that ran the execution gangs and the secret police free rein to murder millions of his fellow ethnic Russians and Jews due to his insane paranoia.
These Jewish Bolsheviks were the driving force behind the Russian Revolution and the Soviet Union, and they projected their self loathing upon not just Russians but also those Jews who were not militant atheists and Communists like them. In their blood frenzy anyone who was a nationalist, anti-communist, a democrat, religious, Jewish or non-Jewish, was regarded as an enemy.
Putin and his historians have made the fundamental mistake of trying to re-write history by blaming Poland for the war, instead of simply telling the truth that Stalin was an insane lunatic and that the Bolsheviks in the secret police NKVD and other security units were primarily an Jewish death cult determined to liquidate as many Christians, religious Jews and non-Jewish Russians as possible.
The war has to be laid at the feet of the Bolsheviks, Stalin and the Jewish terrorists in the empire of horror created by Stalin and his willing executioners.
No Russian Revolution = No Hitler.
Let us not forget the words of Winston Churchill himself.
In an article in the Illustrated Sunday Herald on February 8 1920, Winston Churchill asserted::
" There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. "
The Holocaust was the price ordinary Jews of Europe paid for the actions of the Bolshevik Jews in Russia after the Russian Revolution.
The fear of the Bolshevik threat, and the fact that so many Jews were Bolsheviks, allowed Hitler to link Jews with Bolshevism.
Therefore the Holocaust lays at the feet of those Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia and Germany whose actions allowed ordinary people, and ordinary Germans, to link Bolshevism with Jews.
Hitler used this linkage between Jews in Russia and the ideology of Bolshevism as the basis of his anti-Jewish propaganda, and this in turn led to the Holocaust itself.
Those like Rosa Luxemberg, a Jewish-Polish Bolshevik, were used by Hitler to create the perception that Germany was threatened with a Judeo-Bolshevik threat in Germany that linked Jews, Russia and Bolshevism - and this was, unfortunately, correct.
The fact that Bolshevik scum like Rosa Luxemberg have statues erected in their honour in todays Germany shows how sick and degenerate Germany has become.
She would have turned Germany into a death camp like the Soviet Union, a charnel house of horror and murder with gulags filled with Germans, Jews, democrats and nationalists.
It was the actions of Bolshevik filth like Rosa Luxemberg in Germany during the Spartacist Uprising that allowed Hitler to equate Jews and Bolshevism - and thereby prepare the way for the Holocaust.
The issue that never gets debated in the media or the Hollywood movies is why did ordinary Germans participate in the Holocaust.
There are two reasons ;
1) They were ordered too as they would have been shot if they did'nt eg the troops involved in killings and shipping prisoners to concentration camps and concentration camp guards
2) They were terrified of Jewish Bolshevism as they saw what scum like Rosa Luxemberg did in Germany after WW1 and they feared that if the Communists took power, what happened in Russia would happen to them.
The Holocaust was not the product of 'evil' Germans, it was a product of the fear installed in ordinary Germans by the Russian Revolution and the actions of Jewish Bolsheviks like Rosa Luxemberg in Germany itself.
Faced with the horror of the Gulags in Russia, the Germans, including Jews, voted for the Nazis to smash the Bolsheviks.
Many people forget that over 150,000 Jews and part Jewish Germans fought and volunteered to fight for Germany during WW2. They too felt the fear of Bolshevism.
HAVE WE FORGOTTEN WHY WE FOUGHT IN WORLD WAR TWO?
V FOR VICTORY: Churchill became PM in 1940
Thursday August 27,2009
By Leo McKinstry
ON the eve of the Battle of Britain in 1940, when the fate of our nation hung in balance, Spit- fire pilot Bill Millington wrote to his parents, “Being British, I am proud of my country and its peoples, proud to serve under the Union Jack and regard it as an Englishman’s privilege to fight for all those things that make life worth living: freedom, honour and fair play.”
Like so many in the RAF, Millington made the ultimate sacrifice in the heroic, victorious struggle against the Luftwaffe, as his plane was shot down over the southern coast. Yet his words beautifully encapsulate the spirit of patriotism that galvanised the British people during the Second World War.
It was the same deep love of our island home which inspired the soaring rhetoric of Winston Churchill, drove men to fight on the beaches of normandy and the deserts of north Africa, compelled exhausted bomber crews to fly on missions for night after night over Germany, and enabled the British public to survive the Blitz so stoically. Patriotism is one of man-kind’s most noble ideals, an extension of the natural loyalty we feel to our families, friends and neighbourhood. In its highest form, it requires us to lay
down our lives to protect others, just as a devoted husband might risk all to defend his wife or children.
But in our modern age, patriotism is despised rather than admired. For the Marxist ideologues who now run Britain, love of country is a vice, not a virtue. As a result we are now encouraged to learn entirely the wrong lessons from the Second World War. Instead of being presented as a magnificent defence of our native land against a savage aggressor, the conflict is now portrayed as a triumph for the forces of political correctness against right-wing extremism.
In this warped narrative the Second World War has been transformed into a gigantic crusade against xenophobia, while our soldiers, sailors and airmen are regarded as armed outreach workers in a vast anti- racism project. It is a bizarre paradox of our times that, thanks to the predominance of multi-cultural dogma, the patriotic instinct that led to national salvation in 1945 is now treated as a thought crime.
The sense of unifying national identity that once motivated millions of Britons to defend their homeland is held to be suspect by a political elite obsessed with cultural diversity. We are told that opposition to mass immigration is the equivalent of siding with the Nazis.
Next month marks the 70th anniversary of the German invasion of Poland, which sparked the Second World War. In fact, Adolf Hitler had originally planned to begin the inva- sion on August 26, 1939, but at the last minute had hesitated, partly because of British and French guarantees to support the integrity of Poland, and partly because of the decision of Mussolini’s Italian fascist regime to remain neutral.
As it turned out, when Germany attacked on Septem- ber 1, Britain did precious little to come to Poland’s aid. It was only after the nazis advanced through western Europe in May 1940 that Britain, under the new leadership of Winston Churchill, began to fight in earnest. But the vigour of 1940, compared to the lassitude of 1939, proves that the war was really about national defence, not an ideological campaign.
It is impossible to imagine the Britain of 2009 enjoying the same sense of patriotic cohesion that existed in 1940 if our very existence came under threat. In official circles, the concept of Britishness is a source of embarrassment and shame. We are a nation whose sovereignty has been surrendered to Brussels and whose unity has been destroyed by the collapse of our borders.
The Second World War has been dragooned into service by the political zealots as a battering ram against our national identity. The Government’s own educational quango, the Qualifica- tions and Curriculum Authority, boasts that history teaching should be a tool for “valuing diversity and challenging racism” by gaining insights “into issues around human rights, equality and migration.”
Every museum related to the Second World War focuses obsessively on the role of ethnic minorities
in the conflict, every EU bureaucrat stresses the importance of the European integration as a means of overcoming dangerous nationalist sentiments. One perverse aspect of this modern rewriting of history is
the reluctance to blame Germany for the Second World War. All the blame is heaped on Hitler and the Nazis, while the German nation is exonerated.
In truth, it was the Ger- mans who voted Hitler into power, who eagerly supported the war in its early years, and who ferociously resisted the Allies right until May 1945. Nazism could never have flourished without German enthusiasm for this vile creed, something that is now airbrushed from history in the drive to create a United States of Europe. The supreme irony is that we fought in 1940 to defend our
national independence from German aggression, yet almost 70 years later we are now sub-sumed within a German-dominated continental bureaucracy.
I recently spoke to a D-Day veteran from the West Mid- lands. With anger and regret, he told me that he did not fight in order to end up as an alien in his own country. Even more insulting, he said, was being
told by politicians that the destruction of his society was the ideal for which he had gone into battle. His despair shows how deep has been the betrayal of his brave generation of patriots.
Tuesday, 1 September 2009
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
The other one -
I think in WW1 and 2, Britain and the Old Dominions scored a substantial victory in preserving their essentially Protestant identities - these identities being a genuine 'peoples' choice.'
The 5 Texts inscribed on the gravestone of The Unknown Warrior interred in Westminster Abbey bear witness to this victory.
They are all from a 1611 Authorized King James Holy Bible.
A Central Powers victory in WW1 or an Axis Powers victory in WW2 may have been long shots but no way would either victory have allowed the English-speaking peoples to retain their Olde Booke, which Queen Victoria said accounted for "the supremacy of England."
The reasons for the above statement are set out in the works of French historian, the late Edmond Paris. They are The Secret History of the Jesuits and The Vatican Against Europe.
Well worth perusing.
World war 1 and 2 were a disaster for European western nations. They marked the turning point and in one hundred years when the west will have been overwhelmed by the south the folly of the European civil war will be apparent.
In 1939 Hitler wanted a war only with Poland to regain the German city of Danzig and the corridor. By interfering the British fought a war which bankrupted them and made them as much an American colony post war as the Bundesrepublick. It also brought the vile Bolsheviks into the heart of Europe. Yet we still continue to parrot the official line that it was all worthwhile.
No there was another way and if there is one hero it must be Rudolf Hess who tried to obtain peace in 1940 and for his bravery was rewarded with a lifetime in jail.
Post a Comment