Very interesting article below, but the professor has missed a few fundamental points ;
1) A people produce a culture. Change the nature of the people and the culture changes.
This is explictly recognised in Culturism as the demographic majority in any democracy have the right to defend the existing majority culture based on their status as the original group. They are also required to organise politically in order to protect their indigenous culture and therefore also have the right to demand society itself reflect their interests and culture as the majority group in the multi-cultural process.
Demography is the foundation of culture.
2) The BNP have never advocated ethnic cleansing.
Our agenda is based on democratic consensus, voluntary repatriation and only the forced removals of convicted criminals, terrorists and illegal entrants.
3) A culturist ideology will never be allowed to enter any mainstream Liberal Conservative party in Britain like the Tory Party.
Culturism will always be defined as racist by the left and liberals, therefore it will never be allowed to become part of any mainstream establishment political party of the reactionary right.
Therefore the only way the Culturist Meme will survive and prosper in the politicial environment of contemporary and future British society is within the medium of the Nationalist movement.
But the Culturists reject the Nationalists, as Culturists are unwilling to accept the reality that demography is the foundation of culture.
Culturists seek not victory in politics but crave acceptance by Liberals.
They chase approval and validation, not power and liberty. But the liberals will always despise them.
Therefore the best amongst the Culturists must work within Nationalism, and not attack it from outside whilst wishing for a politics that will never happen.
Time is too short.
Culturist Solutions, Vlaams Belang, the BNP and the USA
Prof. John Press - 5/25/2009
Blogs and political parties focus on the spread of Islam. They have made us aware – if terrorism did not – of the danger Islam can pose to western civilization. But, what solutions can be had? Many worry that right – leaning political parties such as the BNP and Vlaams Belang will, for lack of positive options, move towards advocating ethnic cleansing. Such actions would completely undermine our values and cause major civil unrest. This policy could destroy the West. Culturism relies on history. American history provides lots of positive, legal solutions to the fear of Islamic law growing in western nations.
We have long taken culturist action based upon an appreciation for our culture and its fragility. Puritans, the two Great Awakenings, the Freeman's bureau and Beecher's spreading of women's schools, Abolition and Prohibition, our naturalization and immigration laws, progressivism, the FCC and the Americanization movement all illustrate that we have a culturist heritage. Culturist mass movements of concerned citizens provided the impetus for many of these culturist episodes and mechanisms. We must again come to see ourselves as a culturist nation.
Our culturist immigration laws provide an example of solutions from our history. The 1921 and 1924 immigration laws capped thirty years of culturist agitation. These excluded Southern and Eastern Europeans. The quotas were based on the 1890 census. Right or wrong, culturist immigration laws fall within the scope of our traditions. We also have many other immigration court cases to draw upon. The obvious application is having another culturist law aimed at restricting immigration from Islamic nations. This is not racist, it is culturist. If such laws cannot now pass legal muster, you'd get the same effect by outlawing immigration from terrorist nations. Certainly this is within the rights of our nation.
We also have the right to take our naturalization laws seriously. There is a language component. Besides this, there is a loyalty clause; becoming an American citizen means disavowing allegiance to foreign potentates. We have tossed out folks who advocated the overthrow of our government for violating the loyalty clause before. Another legal tool is ending of monetary remittance to the home country. This would stop American funding of Jihad. People who then stayed here would be clearer that they were working towards the betterment of this nation. We can also stand up for our legal system as a component of our culture. That means saying no to Islamic or Sharia law. That means no polygamy, etc. Taking these culturist stances in law would help
Without invoking legal changes we can insist that schools once again recognize their traditional culturist mission. These need to teach our historical western narrative as a progressive one. One also based on values of duty and responsibility. You teach this by teaching the culturist history mentioned above. The schools of all nations are culturist. They transmit the dominant culture. We should enlarge the scope of our national holidays. We should have thematic parades, etc. This does not mean that those who do not want to partake must, but we have a right to celebrate our majority culture. When it is a good culture, like ours, it is good to do so and serves important culturist purposes.
We must welcome foreign investment, but we cannot allow culturist imperialism in the form of Saudi Funded Whabbi Mosques. Obviously, because of the 1st Amendment, citizens may build whatever religious complexes they like. But, just as we have no international right to build churches in Saudi Arabia or China, there is no international right to build mosques in America. And, herein, demographics are important; we live in a democracy. That means, in part, the majority gets to direct the community via votes. That is self-government. If we wish to vote in such restrictions we may.
The ACLU needs to be counterbalanced by recognizing the legal standing of the majority culture. This is also a tradition. Read the first and second Supreme Court cases concerning Jehovah's Witnesses. The need for a community to perpetuate itself has traditionally had standing. And throughout most of our history the law has assumed the existence of culturist rights exist and balance out individual rights. The modern idea that one individual's sensitivities overrule the entire community's right to perpetuate traditions should be questioned. You do not have the right to build a porn shop next to an elementary school. Self-governance is our tradition.
We must also remember that culturist profiling is not racist profiling. And that while racist profiling would be bad, culturist profiling - because diversity is real - is rational and necessary. Splitting the two allows rational dialogue. This allows you to explain to Muslim citizens of America, that only strongly anti-American mosques and their members will be watched. You can get some in the Muslim community to acknowledge that this is necessary. And then we must scrupulously avoid keeping an eye on anyone for whom there is no probable cause. This way you can have legal, rational security, without violating the rights of Americans. If we violate the rights of people with no sensitivity, resentment will be justified. We have no need to, and should not, antagonize any good Muslim citizens.
Were the demographics frozen as they are now, were Muslims to get no adverse treatment, were radical mosques to stop spreading, were remittance and western cultural laws used to remove the incentive for radicals to move to America, the remaining Muslim population would likely become fairly content and moderate. Remember that rising populations and intimidation feed terrorism. If we praise our culture in our schools and in our discussions, if we provide fun holidays, most every citizen will more enjoy being an American. This is a positive program. It will reap more rewards than pure negativity and unjust discrimination.
We also need to change our international outlook. We must replace the globalist vision with a culturist vision. We have a side in international disputes. Despite what multiculturalists say, we have a core culture. We are the West. We are not the world. Since other nations do not accept refugees we need not. Other nations are culturist, we be so too. We should support Israel and other western nations because they are western. We should not send aid to Muslim countries. Muslim countries do not help us out. We should not be the only non-culturist civilization.
To initiate any of this, we need a shift in public discourse. Right now we would dismiss many of the above solutions as 'racist.' These culturst policies have nothing to do with race. We must recognize them as culturist. This will allow us to discuss such policies rationally on the basis of cultural diversity being real. And, we must embrace this fact. Multiculturalism needs to be counterbalanced. We will always have diversity. But we must stress our unity. We must avoid the extremes of both those who only wish to blindly celebrate diversity and those who preach hatred of Muslims, but provide no positive solutions. The West must acknowledge cultural diversity and start talking about legal and reasonable culturist solutions.
We can help foster culturist awareness and policies by using the terms culturism and culturist. When we use the word culturism we challenge multiculturalism. In every education school in America, students should demand culturst courses counterbalance the multiculturalist ones. When we use the word culturist we help silence those who abuse the word racism to stop conversations. When invoking the words, we stop being the only globalists on the planet and counterbalance the anti-social use of individual rights in the Courts. Finally, using the terms culturism and culturist help us remember our culturist traditions. Unlike multiculturalism, unlike the hysteria of racists, culturism and culturists point to many positive solutions.
John Press is an adjunct professor at New York University.
Monday, 25 May 2009
Professor John Press and Culturism
Posted by Defender of Liberty at 09:41
Labels: BNP, new york university, proffessor john press
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Just for info if you haven't seen it already.
IF you had any doubt about the kind of outfit the British National Party really is, consider this leaflet (...)
It is headed: "Stop this illegal Gurkha immigration." It warns of "Gurkha ghettos" (...)
Most disgusting of all, the leaflet carries the picture of a Gurkha with a cross through it (...)http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/opinion/Bernard-Dinneen-We-should-back.5299957.jp
Nick Griffin has just made an appeal for donations to the website defence fund, read his full message here:
Text "BRITISH" to 60777 to donate £3.
Text "DONATE" to 60777 to donate £3.
Lee, did your LLB(Hons) course include anything on intellectual property rights? Even if it didn't, I hope you've got permission from the copyright holders to repost the text of all these articles...
Oh, and there's only one 'F' in Professor. (...but no effin' chance to get the BNP into power)
Aw, the White Supremacist Goddess (why a female alter ego, Lee?) got slapped down for getting that txt wrong on another blog too. How does it feel to be a dunce among morons?
tl;dr said... "Lee, did your LLB(Hons) course include anything on intellectual property rights? Even if it didn't, I hope you've got permission from the copyright holders to repost the text of all these articles..." With printed articles from newspapers and online articles, anyone is free to reproduce them as long as the source is acknowledged and the article correctly attributed to the source, or unless the source specifically requests permissions is granted first. Therefore your pathetic statement means nothing, and is another deluded fool grasping desperately at straws. Much in the same way you point out a spelling mistake, this has already been dealt with in previous replies, and it is amusing to watch you idiots always go on about spelling mistakes... another sign of your utter desperation.
Another anonymous idiot said... "Aw, the White Supremacist Goddess (why a female alter ego, Lee?) got slapped down for getting that txt wrong on another blog too. How does it feel to be a dunce among morons?"So a Celtic goddess is a white supremacist goddess? LOL. you really are desperate now... so are you saying that anyone who has an interest in Celtic mythology is a white supremacist? You people really are pathetic, the stuff you throw at us is utterly pathetic.
Btw, sorry to disappoint but Lee Barnes and myself are different people... funny though to read your desperate attacks. Please carry on, it really is interesting to observe.
So... which section(s) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act are you relying on here? Or are you basing your defence of this practice on (*whispers*) European legislation?
Wouldn't it be a lot easier just to learn how to do links in <a> tags, Lee?
That would certainly make it easier for us, your loyal readers, to figure out where your blather ends and the material written by other people begins.
Post a Comment