Dear peter makes a few points here below and I will respond.
I will analyse them and respond point by point in brackets beneath his comments, I have also posted them on his website so lets see if he responds and puts them up or censors them as usual ;
I've likewise done what I can to explain why the BNP should not receive the support of any civilised person.
( But people should support and vote for those who civilised people in the Tory Party and Labour Party who voted to attack Iraq and slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent people and waste the lives of hundreds of British soldiers. Your civilised people are crooks and war criminals. Your civilised political people in the establishment parties are the scum of the earth )
I have examined the BNP. I have met its activists and its leader, and read its key documents, which is more than many of its supporters have done.
( here we go - silly peter )
It contains both pitiful, unhinged Judophobes and convicted criminals.
( Ad Hominem attack again eh peter. No war criminals in our ranks though or proffesional criminal fraudsters like in all the other parties. And lets ignore our Jewish members and supporters and councillors. No perjuring lords, paedophiles, and fraudsters in our ranks. )
Its own constitution (I point out for the fiftieth time) clearly and unambiguously defines it as a racially-bigoted party.
( Tsk, Tsk, peter - if the BNP is 'bigoted' then so are the Black Police Officers Association, the AFRO-CARIBBEAN LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, the Black Lawyers Association ETC and all those other black / jewish / muslim groups and charities that work for their communities only. They all have ethno-specific memberships that seek to represent the interests of their community in the multi-cultural process. You may not notice we live in a multi-cultural society where the community that does not organise to represent its interests loses out socially, politically, culturally etc etc. If you dont like multi-culturalism then scrap it - until then dont call us racist for organising to protect our interests as a community. We have already lost enough of our rights and culture because we have not organised to protect purselves in the past. )
There is no doubt that this specific, declared bigotry loses the BNP important support. No Christian, for instance, can conscientiously support it, as both Old and New Testaments unequivocally point out that all men are made in the image of God, and that Christ does not distinguish between 'Jew and Greek, slave and free'.
( Crikey peter is now an authority on the Bible, but lets let him have rather warped view of Christianity as a liberal cult where those that refuse to see the difference between the races that god created have to be expelled from gods church. You dont have to be a Christian to join the BNP, we are a secular party not a christian cult )
(It is the Darwinist survival-of-the-fittest merchants whose philosophy underpins fantasies of racial superiority, though they try to wriggle out of this nowadays).
( The BNP have never stood for racial superiority, another petty lie peter )
Yet the BNP leadership will not abandon it. If the 'policies' they currently adopt (for opportunistic rather than principled reasons) were their real objective, and they were truly concerned for the future of the country, then they would purge themselves both of this poison and of the unrepentant Holocaust-deniers and similar toxic swivel-heads still in their ranks. They could do this out of genuine repentance, or solely out of a self-interested desire for power.
( AAAAH so peter wants the BNP to be UKIP and another flaccid pseudo-party that offers no real competition to the tories but merely ensures the tories remain on the right )
Either would be rational actions, and repentance would actually be a genuine step forward.
(repentance for what - not being the tories and UKIP ? )
However, their bigotry is their fundamental driving force, and so central to them that they cannot abandon it, which is why they cannot and will not do this, even though their inaction harms them greatly. That bigotry will continue to inform and direct everything that they do. It is central to their purpose and being. And that is why it would be both wrong and mistaken for anyone to vote for them.
( Bigotry now. Is peter calling the black police officers association etc bigots who espuse bigotry ? if he isnt then he is as usual talking out of his arse )
BNP enthusiasts don't address this point, because they can't, without admitting that their main motivation is racial prejudice, which they understandably prefer not to do (though this restraint is absent from various nasty websites where BNP supporters, unleashed, let their true feelings show).
( No peter we do not support racial prejudice we fight for our rights as the indigenous British people in the multi-cultural process. Wait until Harriet Harmans new equality laws legalise positive discrmination racism against whites then when you get the sack, and your kids cant get a job, you will get the picture peter. It will be too late then though for you peter ? )
Instead they make rude remarks about me, which are of course very welcome from such a source.
( we dont make rude remarks about you peter, we actually think you talk a lot of sense , but you are paid by the media scu that pimp out the political pigs to the masses and he who takes the cursed gold becomes owned by their evil masters - you do what you do as you have no real choice )
When one of them does address it, or makes an honest effort to do so, I'll respond.
( Okay peter here it is - respond )
Otherwise not. It is sad to see well-intentioned gullible people being fooled by this unpleasant formation.
( are we talking about the BNP here or the tories ? )
Modern politics seems to consist largely of the well-intentioned being fooled by scoundrels of one kind or another.
( and modern politics is run by media corporations that subvert democracy and pay people like you to print stories that ensure the political pigs they support stay in power by exploiting well intentioned and good people )
So peter, instead of repeating crass Ad hominem attacks with the usual facile perjoratives in your articles, ask us the questions and we will respond point by point or submit them to Nick Griffin and he can.